On 07/24/2017 11:49 AM, oldk1331 wrote:
>> TeXmacs once had/has an interface to FriCAS.
> TeXmacs plugin is usable. One feature is that you can select
> part of the output and use that as input.
The problem with TeXmacs is that every time I try to use it, it feels
slow and sometimes not working
> TeXmacs once had/has an interface to FriCAS.
TeXmacs plugin is usable. One feature is that you can select
part of the output and use that as input.
> in hyperdoc. Anything that I have forgotten?
Well, hyperdoc has pages that are templates you can
fill, although I never use. This "dynamic" ab
On 07/24/2017 11:05 AM, oldk1331 wrote:
> I'm kind of in a paradox right now:
No, it's not a dilemma. Everyone should do what he/she can do best.
> I have 2 big objectives:
>
> 1. Make FriCAS better, by fixing bugs, adding new features.
Very much appreciate.
> 2. Attracting more users and deve
> Although I don't believe in Python, this language obviously played an
> important role in sewing all the different packages together to obtain
> SageMath. However, weren't Sage developers also looking at the Julia
> language?
I have a few rant about python/julia:
There are some obvious problems
I'm kind of in a paradox right now:
I have 2 big objectives:
1. Make FriCAS better, by fixing bugs, adding new features.
2. Attracting more users and developers to FriCAS, because FriCAS
is doing computer algebra "the right way" (at least I think so).
I can do objective 1, but it'll be slow, so
Qian,
> But that's the "future" plan. Right now I have hundreds of bugs
> in algebra to fix.
I very much appreciate your work. You really bring FriCAS quite a step
forward. Thank you.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra
On 07/24/2017 10:04 AM, Bill Page wrote:
>> Still I wonder how sage has attracted so many users and
>> developers.
I'd say, one important aspect is that William Stein is a strong leader,
who managed to attract a sufficiently large community around his idea to
replace the big M's and by "assembling
> SageMath is very gradually replacing some of
> the dependence on these third party packages with specifically
> designed and/or taylored SageMath components especially in the area of
> symbolic computation.
Hi Bill, I have been curious about this for a while: how many (percentage)
are implemente
On 24 July 2017 at 01:12, oldk1331 wrote:
> Some random thoughts:
>
I suppose that you are comparing FriCAS to SageMath? My comments below
should not be taken as any sort of endorsement or advertisement but
rather points for comparison.
> 1. I can't find a changelog so I don't know what key
> fe
