[Full-disclosure] an open letter to kevin bacon: hello, how's it going?

2007-11-01 Thread silky
please, if you know kevin bacon, can you forward this mail to him, and have him reply to me? or at least if you know someone who you think might then know him, please send it on. i'm testing something. thanks. == hi kevin! it's mike! how

[Full-disclosure] SEC Consult SA-20071101-0 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SonicWALL SSL-VPN Client

2007-11-01 Thread Bernhard Mueller
SEC Consult Security Advisory < 20071101-0 > = title: Multiple vulnerabilities in SonicWALL SSL-VPN Client * Deletion of arbitrary files on the

Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 33, Issue 1

2007-11-01 Thread Joxean Koret
Hi, You're wrong. First of all, yes, is a preauth sql injection in an "admin console" but, if you have privileges to connect to the Oracle Financials instance, even as a normal unprivileged user, you have sufficient privileges to access it. You don't need to have assigned the SYSADMIN responsabili

Re: [Full-disclosure] Flash that simulates virus scan

2007-11-01 Thread Simon Smith
Heh... not sure what government you're referring to... btw, you going to answer my earlier question or not? reepex wrote: > dont you listen to pdp ever? the government uses xss and bruteforces > remote desktop logins > > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2007/Oct/0417.html > > pdp: "military gr

Re: [Full-disclosure] an open letter to kevin bacon: hello, how's it going?

2007-11-01 Thread Kollberg, Dirk
What did your last slave die of? Dirk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of silky Sent: Donnerstag, 1. November 2007 12:45 To: Full-Disclosure Subject: [Full-disclosure] an open letter to kevin bacon: hello,how's it going? please, if you know

[Full-disclosure] [ MDKSA-2007:203 ] - Updated xen packages fix multiple vulnerabilities

2007-11-01 Thread security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ___ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDKSA-2007:203 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ ___

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread nnp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oh don't be so bloody sensationalist. You're worse than the journalists because you should know better. - -nnp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org iD8DBQFHKpQRbP10WPHfgnQRAtZ9AKDIydXWUjKG

Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 33, Issue 1

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
On Nov 1, 2007 9:36 AM, Joxean Koret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, yes, is a preauth sql injection in an "admin > console" but, if you have privileges to connect to the Oracle Financials > instance, So as I said its 'post auth' sql injection but thanks for clarifying. > And secon

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
It is funny that gadi does not post to this list anymore.. maybe its because he knows people here can actually express their opinion against his retarded posts without being moderated? anyway of course gadi is going to jump over stuff like this because it takes no technical knowledge to write abou

[Full-disclosure] [ MDKSA-2007:204 ] - Updated cups packages fix vulnerability

2007-11-01 Thread security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ___ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDKSA-2007:204 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ ___

[Full-disclosure] rPSA-2007-0227-1 cups

2007-11-01 Thread rPath Update Announcements
rPath Security Advisory: 2007-0227-1 Published: 2007-10-31 Products: rPath Linux 1 Rating: Major Exposure Level Classification: Remote Deterministic Denial of Service Updated Versions: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1/1.1.23-14.3-1 rPath Issue Tracking System: https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-18

[Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Gadi Evron
For whoever didn't hear, there is a Macintosh trojan in-the-wild being dropped, infecting mac users. Yes, it is being done by a regular online gang--itw--it is not yet another proof of concept. The same gang infects Windows machines as well, just that now they also target macs. http://sunbeltbl

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Steven Block
You're an idiot. Save this as a script and run it, it will give you unlimited power: #!/bin/sh sudo rm -rf / Enter your password if you are prompted. Oh look, malware. On Oct 31, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Gadi Evron wrote: > For whoever didn't hear, there is a Macintosh trojan in-the-wild > being d

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Thor (Hammer of God)
> For whoever didn't hear, there is a Macintosh trojan in-the-wild being > dropped, infecting mac users. > Yes, it is being done by a regular online gang--itw--it is not yet > another > proof of concept. The same gang infects Windows machines as well, just > that now they also target macs. > > htt

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Nick FitzGerald
Steven Block to Gadi Evron: > You're an idiot. > > Save this as a script and run it, it will give you unlimited power: > > #!/bin/sh > sudo rm -rf / > > Enter your password if you are prompted. > > Oh look, malware. Were you looking in a mirror while writing that? If you think there are not

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, November 01, 2007 13:27:07 -0600 Steven Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're an idiot. > > Save this as a script and run it, it will give you unlimited power: > ># !/bin/sh > sudo rm -rf / > > Enter your password if you are prompted. > > Oh look, malware. If you don't think t

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
On Nov 1, 2007 4:34 PM, Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, today, the average level of clue among Mac users is probably a > shade higher than amongst Windows users, Is this a joke? The reason people switch to macs is because they cannot handle simple tasks. Isnt the main thing s

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, November 01, 2007 16:42:51 -0500 reepex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 1, 2007 4:34 PM, Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, today, the average level of clue among Mac users is probably a > shade higher than amongst Windows users, > > > > Is this a joke? The

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
I will take that pepsi challenge... what is at stake ;) On Nov 1, 2007 4:50 PM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 16:42:51 -0500 reepex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Nov 1, 2007 4:34 PM, Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > Yes

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread nnp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There's a difference between ignoring something and making a statement like 'OS X is the new Windows 98.' Its sensationalist and of no use, especially when posted to lists that are supposedly populated with security experts. Everyone here is aware of

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Nick FitzGerald
reepex to me: > > Yes, today, the average level of clue among Mac users is probably a > > shade higher than amongst Windows users, > > Is this a joke? The reason people switch to macs is because they cannot > handle simple tasks. Isnt the main thing said by new mac users is 'it just > works' me

[Full-disclosure] N3TD3V INTERNET SECURITY THREAT CENTER

2007-11-01 Thread worried security
*CYBER TERRORISM* *Talk about the current threat level.* *Discuss the internet terror threat* ** *SOFTWARE FLAWS* *Post your own research or talk about other peoples.* *Discuss technical vulnerabilities* ** *SECURITY NEWS * *Talk about news hitting the tv,radio and internet.* *Discuss wha

[Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200711-01 ] gFTP: Multiple vulnerabilities

2007-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200711-01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Dude VanWinkle
On 11/1/07, nnp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > There's a difference between ignoring something and making a statement like > > 'OS X is the new Windows 98.' OK How about "iPhone is the new Win9x"? It is running a type of OSX, one that is configured

[Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200711-02 ] OpenSSH: Security bypass

2007-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200711-02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread nnp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not sure if you accidentally quoted my reply or not there, because if you did you're completely missing my point. My issue is with the format and content (or lack thereof) of the first post, I don't think I mentioned the iPhone, *BSD, MS or at any

[Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200711-03 ] Gallery: Multiple vulnerabilities

2007-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200711-03 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Peter Besenbruch
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 13:21:00 Gadi Evron wrote: > This means one thing: Apple's day has finally come and Apple users are > going to get hit hard. All those unpatched vulnerabilities from years past > are going to bite them in the behind. > > I can sum it up in one sentence: OS X is the new

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread worried security
On 10/31/07, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For whoever didn't hear, there is a Macintosh trojan in-the-wild being > dropped, infecting mac users. > Yes, it is being done by a regular online gang--itw--it is not yet another > proof of concept. The same gang infects Windows machines as we

[Full-disclosure] XSS - www.howtoforge.com

2007-11-01 Thread Emmanouil Gavriil
Cross Site Scripting at howtoforge.. http://www.howtoforge.com/trip_search?keys=alert('XSS-Test') Emmanouil Gavriil___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - h

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Alex Eckelberry
> Let's not over-hype this-- while "Apple's day" has been coming, saying that users will be "hit hard" on something the user has to > manually download, manually execute, and explicitly grant administrative privileges to is *way* over the top. The future of malware is going to be largely through

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Adam St. Onge
So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more you must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf". Would we consider this a trojan...or just stupidity? On 11/1/07, Alex Eckelberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's not over-hype this-- while "Apple's day" has been coming, say

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Gadi Evron
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jim Harrison wrote: > While Apple-oriented threats may not get either the validation or the > publicity (on hardly equals the other) that Windows attacks do, it's hardly > accurate (much less fair) to make those comparisons. > For all those comparative points, my Kaypro-4 runn

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Roger A. Grimes
Actually, on that same note, I recently did an analysis of the last three years of published Windows vulnerabilities. 86% required local end-user interaction (i.e. social engineering) to be pulled off. http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/10/19/42OPsecadvise-insider-threats_ 1.html I didn't analyz

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Jim Harrison
Heh-heh; he said "Steve Gibson"; heh-heh-heh Seriously; Tim is right. While Apple-oriented threats may not get either the validation or the publicity (on hardly equals the other) that Windows attacks do, it's hardly accurate (much less fair) to make those comparisons. For all those comparative p

Re: [Full-disclosure] [botnets] re MAC trojan (fwd)

2007-11-01 Thread Gadi Evron
There have been many threads on this subject, but I believe this post below covers what some of us are trying to say on why this issue is significant. Obviously some people are far more articulate than me. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:47:17 -0400 From: PinkF

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Peter Besenbruch
On Thursday 01 November 2007 11:49:09 Alex Eckelberry wrote: > The future of malware is going to be largely through social engineering. > Does that mean we ignore every threat that comes out because it requires > user interaction? Seems like whistling past the graveyard to me. Alex, no-one is sa

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Thor (Hammer of God)
That's an interesting figure (86% that is). Can you give us some insight into what you define as "user interaction"? If it is clicking a link or reading an HTML email, then OK. If it is opening an .exe from an email, I'd like to see what client you are talking about and what environment (meaning

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On November 1, 2007 3:36:00 PM -1000 Peter Besenbruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Firefox throws up a download dialog, asking what I should do with "prettyyoungthing.rpm," while a Javascript pop-up explains that to see these great images, I need to save the file, and type "rpm -i prettyyoungth

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more you must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf". Would we consider this a trojan...or just stupidity? I would consider it stupidity to think

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Jay Sulzberger
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Adam St. Onge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more you > must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf". > Would we consider this a trojan...or just stupidity? Yes, a Trojan. Yes, stupidity on the part of the designer

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Jay Sulzberger
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more >> you must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf". >> >> >> Would we cons

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Steven Adair
> --On November 1, 2007 10:14:50 PM -0400 Jay Sulzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> --On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a we

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On November 1, 2007 10:14:50 PM -0400 Jay Sulzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see m

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On November 1, 2007 4:53:12 PM -1000 Peter Besenbruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is no need to do that. In both Macs and Gnome or KDE on Unix, if you try to run rpm -i (of whatever the install paradigm is on your flavor of OS), you'll be *prompted* for the root password, not asked to ru

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Peter Besenbruch
On Thursday 01 November 2007 16:13:10 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On November 1, 2007 3:36:00 PM -1000 Peter Besenbruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Firefox throws up a download dialog, asking what I should do > > with "prettyyoungthing.rpm," while a Javascript pop-up explains that to > > see th

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Jay Sulzberger
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's an interesting figure (86% that is). Can you give us some > insight into what you define as "user interaction"? > > If it is clicking a link or reading an HTML email, then OK. If it is > opening an .exe from an email,

[Full-disclosure] Skype IM upgrade/repair automated social engineering attack

2007-11-01 Thread Dragos Ruiu
With all the proliferation of phone home for update systems in even trivial software packages these days, neophyte users can easily get confused about legitimate upgrades and imposters. So someone is trying to take advantage of this with an automated version of an old school social engineering

Re: [Full-disclosure] XSS - www.howtoforge.com

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
lol pdp On Nov 1, 2007 4:58 PM, Emmanouil Gavriil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cross Site Scripting at howtoforge.. > > > http://www.howtoforge.com/trip_search?keys=

Re: [Full-disclosure] [botnets] re MAC trojan (fwd)

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
seriously dude wtf ... have you even put any research or thought into this topic? All you have done is paste other peoples sayings, links, and research and spam them to mailing lists to get your name on this topic just like the sendmail, solaris ftp, vnc, and every other bug that comes out. Get a

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Jay Sulzberger
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On November 1, 2007 10:14:50 PM -0400 Jay Sulzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> --On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Full-disclosure] N3TD3V INTERNET SECURITY THREAT CENTER

2007-11-01 Thread reepex
thanks for your document design.. i would have chose a more blue font over grey though On Nov 1, 2007 5:34 PM, worried security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *CYBER TERRORISM* > > *Talk about the current threat level.* > > *Discuss the internet terror threat* > > ** > > *SOFTWARE FLAWS* > > *Post

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan-vs-USERS

2007-11-01 Thread RMueller
I read a lot of babel on this subject. The point is simple...they are users as much as PC folks. Friends, I serve both, and there is not much difference. 15 years doing the same damn job and they still can't add a printer regardless of there OS. Move a folder and "all" programs are gone! Regardless

Re: [Full-disclosure] N3TD3V INTERNET SECURITY THREAT CENTER

2007-11-01 Thread scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would definitely delete all the spam comments before I offered it to the public as a security site.Seems comment spammers own the site. Granted,it is a lot of work to delete the spam.On the other hand,I would prefer a site that showed the ability to

Re: [Full-disclosure] mac trojan in-the-wild

2007-11-01 Thread Nick FitzGerald
Adam St. Onge wrote: > So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more you > must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf". > Would we consider this a trojan...or just stupidity? That would be "just stupidity", to use your terminology. "Trojan functionality" is a feature of the