-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-1650-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
October 12, 2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-1651-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
October 12, 2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-1652-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
October 12, 2008
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, n3td3v wrote:
> there should be a central license that people apply for to use
> software like metasploit.
Oh, do not forget a central license to use a debugger and a central
license to read a book. [1] Not to mention a central license to think.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/philo
Gents -
Consider an old quote from LBJ, approximately "the design of a law when
well administered is rarely the problem. Designing measures that work
when badly administered is what is difficult."
A licensing system might conceivably be administered to enhance security
for the world's software
It would be a good way for the government to leverage control of
hackers and the people who use their tools though. Disclosure Scotland
is already in operation, all you need is a new law to say everyone who
uses security software must get a Disclosure Scotland background check
first.
I think the g
The economics alone of such a set of laws is enough to realize how
unrealistic it is. Not to mention the privacy concerns, international laws,
enforcement, etc. In the perfect world of your imagination this might just
work but in the real world it's an absolutely ridiculous idea. Do you
honestly be
This always has been, and still is, a stupid idea.
n3td3v wrote:
> It would be a good way for the government to leverage control of
> hackers and the people who use their tools though. Disclosure Scotland
> is already in operation, all you need is a new law to say everyone who
> uses security soft
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:58 AM, vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you honestly believe such a thing could ever happen or are you just
> speculating for no reason?
I believe the government might be considering such a scheme, although
im just throwing the idea out there for people to comme
On 10 Oct, 11:56, "Robin Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like the UK government is going to start monitoring us a lot
> closer in the
> future:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/07/detica_interception_modernisation/
they are already doing it, you just don't know about it yet, oh you do
I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:35 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Oct, 11:56, "Robin Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like the UK
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:38 PDT, James Matthews said:
> I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
> years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
Oh, it *will* help. Just not help with bringing crime down.
pgpI5vJcRltnC.pgp
Descripti
12 matches
Mail list logo
