Guys,
This mailing list lives up to its name "Full Disclosure" for
tolerating the monkeys and their chattering in this list for quite
some time now without moderation or any action! This mailing list had
a "culture", "the audience base" and that was the "only reason" we all
subscribed to it!
# St
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2008:239
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
Fredrick Diggle security is proud to announce that an offer has been
made to the established internet security expert and ethical hacker
Valdis Kletniek's Mustache. Fredrick Diggle was confused at first when
the application was received as Fredrick was under the impression that
the mustache was act
yes, he should loose the name, and the attitude that he's the last word and
GOD in Informaiton Security
agreed, if he goes away for 6 - 12 months, and comes back without the
attitude and name there will no longer be N3TD3V SUX stickers at
'con.
Exibar
- Original Message -
The fact that you feel the need to announce that to the world seems
unprofessional and childish.
--On Friday, December 05, 2008 11:34 AM -0600 Ian Wolff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This list is both unprofessional and childish, I'll be unsubscribing.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said:
>> I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like
>> you botching the list up not me.
>
> The basic problem is that you've *been* either a blithering idiot or a
> troll
Listen, all this back and forth about list noise is easily fixable please
see attached.
-Bill
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said:
> > I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like
> > you botching the l
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said:
> I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like
> you botching the list up not me.
The basic problem is that you've *been* either a blithering idiot or a
troll for so long, that even if something sensible *does* get posted from
n
Hey n3td3v, when are you going to disclose any vulnerabilities to this
list? I mean, I know you're an elite hacker whos skills surpass even
that of mi5. But seriously... when can we see some exploits or code...
I mean, even morning_wood released a nikto frontend... albeit a poorly
coded and extreme
I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like
you botching the list up not me.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Exibar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My prediction is that n3td3v will remain and torment us more with
> his/their/its/her unwanted rubbish on this list and will neve
My prediction is that n3td3v will remain and torment us more with
his/their/its/her unwanted rubbish on this list and will never ever leave as
was once promissed
why am I feeding the troll? oh boy...
Exibar
- Original Message -
From: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
S
This list is both unprofessional and childish, I'll be unsubscribing.
From: Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Full Disclosure
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 6:34:08 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Solving of problems
-- Forwarded message --
We here at n3td3v would like to hear your security predictions for 2009.
Last time Paul Ferguson said 2008 would be the year of web 2.0 bugs
and web 2.0 worms, that turned out to be utter rubbish (He does work
for Trend Micro afterall), but in true tradition, let's here some of
your predictions th
well, i just meant that there is a positive and a negative. each
keeping each other in check. mike c needs to go choke on a dick.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:14 PM, vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yin is the dark and yang is the light. Are you saying that you're the evil
> one Ureleet and...
well, sans has said in the past they dont raise their color unless
there is an immediate threat i think. i think chris, in this thread
be4 said the differences pretty well.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:36 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Chris Jeane <[EMAIL PRO
i think that color rating is pretty much retarded w/out sumthing 2
back it up. if there is a reason to raise it, then fine, but keeping
the color at 2 (iss) or yellow (symantec) all the time doesnt do
anything. its like the homeland security colors in teh united states.
if its at yellow all the
good point valdis. the internet storm center doesnt have a stock
price, does that mean they can be more objective? ive noticed they
dont raise theirs unless there _really_ is an issue.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:36:04 GMT, n3td3v said:
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
