On Jan 28, 2008 3:43 PM, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all those who believe Vista is still not up to par,you can help stop
MS from forcing us to go to Vista.
For those who don't know,MS is planning on stopping XP sales after June
30,2008.There are a few options for enterprise users,but
On Jan 31, 2008 3:51 PM, gmaggro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One planned for Egypt-France is 8 pair, each pair doing 128 lambdas
at 10Gbit per lambda. Do the math.
That's a lot of retards
And they dont have to upgrade the fiber in order to upgrade the
bandwidth. They use the same fiber and
On Jan 28, 2008 11:50 AM, worried security
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:32 AM, H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest version of the Metasploit Framework, as well as screen
shots, video demonstrations, documentation and installation
instructions for many platforms, can
On Jan 26, 2008 10:55 AM, gmaggro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dismantling Chanology infrastructure
Yes n3td3v, let us know how you manage to dismantle Usenet while you're
at it.
Don't fuck with n3td3v man, she might just sign you up to her google
group if you keep messing with her.
Thats
On Jan 24, 2008 4:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:07:42 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
On Jan 24, 2008 3:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:18:10 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
OK, 10 points to the person who deciphers this one:
... 7E7E
On Jan 25, 2008 10:04 AM, Nate McFeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the best thread on FD ever, starts with secreview making a
completely unprofessional/mostly uninformed assessment of a consulting
group, moved into some question of secreview and why they think they can do
this, and here
OK, 10 points to the person who deciphers this one:
E5F2C6F68595E5A6D7A8C2C4E8E6F48785E6F9F1C9C7D993E8F293A681C7E5A8C9C7F1F5C9C7C6A9E8F29397C9C8D9A5C9C7D18883F2E4F2D5C3C2938294D5A5E9C7E592C9C8D9A5C9C7E592E8F2D997E8A8C2F0E9E788F0D7A8C2D1C9C8D99682F3E59581C8D8878294F9F0C9D87E7E
-JP
On Jan 2, 2008 2:48 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure signs of someone washed up as evident by your
non-productiveness in the last few years ( and no - spamming mailing lists
does not count )
Gee, I would think that setting up an emergency alert system (pager,
Phone, CCtv, SMTP, etc)
On Dec 20, 2007 6:35 PM, don bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reepex wrote:
nothing don ever does is useful or funny
On Dec 20, 2007 2:14 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don, the origional poster is
On Dec 13, 2007 1:45 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
automatic updates with notification? Silent patching? Microsoft tactics?
I also knew websense was a joke but now you have come to this?
Whats next? AV companies automatically updating without your
permission? Websense adding new sites to
On Dec 12, 2007 3:38 AM, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my first advisories and was rediscovered later, turned into a viable
exploit 2 years after by another researcher.
http://framework.metasploit.com/exploits/view/?refname=windows:ftp:netterm_netftpd_user
On Dec 12, 2007 10:32 PM, Fredrick Diggle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also Dude, your pillow joke was damn hilarious :D how did you think of it?
can you give me joke lessons?
No, but I can give you some pointers on sarcasm.. ;-)
-JP
___
will stuff a pillow in there in order to help curb the urge to
give n3td3v repeated blowjobs on the hour, every hour..
^--- Comedy Platinum (better than gold)
YAY!
On Dec 12, 2007 8:38 PM, Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 3:38 AM, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 4, 2007 8:27 AM, Maloney, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed a 30K increase per day in traffic..
I was finally able to do the numbers:
We do 1,000,000 emails a day
We did 1.3 million that day..
Something must have happened...
-JP
On Dec 5, 2007 6:47 PM, Jay Dephallia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not spam email. You can seriously make yourself bigger with this pill.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has all the info. Just email him about it. Also, ask
him about the size of his cock.
What a surprise you use a gmail account to send
On Dec 5, 2007 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:04:42 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
Anyone who was a security expert 30 yrs ago should be ridiculed. Their
job description was I inspect all 5 1/4 disks that get mailed to
us and should be a reason NOT to hire them :-P
On Dec 5, 2007 10:06 PM, Bob Bruen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 6:47 PM, Jay Dephallia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not spam email. You can seriously make yourself bigger with this pill.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has all the info. Just email him
On Dec 5, 2007 11:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:45:39 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
You are right, thanks for all the careful planning and well thought
out infrastructure. I mean, who could have thought that the ability to
reach into the homes of every tom dick
On Dec 5, 2007 6:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:02:26 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Generally our reviews are done by reading the contents of the
companies website. We strip away all the marketing fluff and we
look for untruths, poor grammar, quality of service,
On Dec 6, 2007 1:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:57:19 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
try this hey boss, you will cause regulation, expose national secrets
to commies,
Umm.. hate to break it to you, but the design was for an *open* research
network. If you said you'd
On Dec 2, 2007 8:46 PM, T Biehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonderous suggestion Dude.
Apparently someone can't spot obvious sarcasm.
I do have a deficiency in that area.. or are you being sarcastic again?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Also Johnson Controls
in 2005 they were busy converting the proprietary BACnet speaking
SCADA devices to embedded windows XP, considering NASA and friends run
JCI, and there is no good way to update embedded XP (AFAIK) remotely,
these systems should be prime targets...
Whats an MLP?
-JP
On Dec
My servers are slammed...
Anyone else notice anything?
-JP
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
On Dec 3, 2007 7:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not much other than the weather outside is frightful, but inside it's so
delightful. :D
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
I guess its more complexity than volume...
damn spam..
On Dec 2, 2007 4:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:32:22 EST, T Biehn said:
Clearly stated, he was cleaning up DOMAIN Administrators, which can,
you know, Administer all the computers on the domain.
What, you don't think that some people are unfortunate enough to be
On Nov 29, 2007 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:44:40 PST, Daniel H. Renner said:
From what I've noticed, users of MS' FTP client aren't the usual
Windows GUI user. So that would be one good social engineering trick...
I wouldn't be surprised if a large
On Nov 17, 2007 8:08 AM, Meef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the steps to follow to become a computer security professional ?,
Read all the phrack magazines, starting with #40 or later.
Learning ASM, Hex Math, C, Binary math, C++ can't hurt.
Study AJAX/XML/WebDAV/.Net/Java, web 2.0 is the
they are tied to encryption software
as for the full disk encryption: You got me there. That will protect you
-JP
On Nov 2, 2007 3:51 PM, Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/07, J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude VanWinkle wrote:
A program installed under false
On 11/4/07, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually no one cares about your posts so it would be better if you stopped
posting completely
when you learn to install gcc you can come back
sudo apt-get install gcc
Sweet! I am back!
BTW: Nice Profile: http://tinyurl.com/create.php
BTW2: Did
On 11/4/07, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 4, 2007 3:13 PM, pdp (architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This
is not very offline.
So you are taking peoples offline conversations and posting them
against their wishes?
Are you trying to make a name for yourself by saying look this
On 11/3/07, worried security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
can everyone stop cross posting?
its the same people on all the mailing lists, there is absolutely no
reason for cross posting.
Sorry about that n3td3v, won't happen again.
I would hate to annoy you like that.
-JP
On 11/3/07, Kelly Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In our IDS logs, I notice many outgoing packets coming from port 80 (HTTP).
These packets are coming from client PCs. What may be happening?
If they are replies to an incoming packet, then they are running a web server.
If they are not
On 11/1/07, nnp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure if you accidentally quoted my reply or not there, because
if you did you're completely missing my point. My issue is with the
format and content (or lack thereof) of the first post, I don't
On 11/2/07, J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude VanWinkle wrote:
A program installed under false pretenses that will give the
author/distributer remote access to the victim machines.
Right... Guess those local are not a threat.
?? Local to the machine??
all prevention methods fail
On 11/1/07, nnp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There's a difference between ignoring something and making a statement like
'OS X is the new Windows 98.'
OK How about iPhone is the new Win9x? It is running a type of OSX,
one that is configured to use
On 10/31/07, Joshua Tagnore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List,
Some time ago I remember that someone posted a PoC of a small site that
had a really nice looking flash animation that performed a virus scan and
after the virus scan was finished, the user was prompted for a Download
virus fix?
On 10/29/07, Leif Ericksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either way they are doing it to advance their own agenda.
bottom line that is what their lack of action is all about. Their own
agenda.
I think his agenda was to make the guys who support the war actually
go on record as supporting the war,
Those are some pretty good faked headers guys (except for the hushmail part)
FYI: No one will notice the difference if you spoof my addy, 'cause I
have been filtered for years!
-JP
On 10/16/07, Dude VanVinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on FD works for Yambo Financials. lulz
- JP.
On
On 10/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-05/msg00267.html
Oh yeah? two can play that game:
http://www.forbiddenweb.org/topic/10084/index.html
-JP
On 10/13/07, worried security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Richard Golodner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you keep this offline between you and full-disclosure? I know
Valdis and he does not give a damn about any of this sophomoric stuff. When
you post legitimate
On 10/13/07, Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, worried security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Richard Golodner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you keep this offline between you and full-disclosure? I know
Valdis and he does not give a damn about any
Sorry, I didnt mean to go over your head. I will dumb it down for you next time.
-JP
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mad technical!
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:55:24 -0400 Dude VanWinkle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/7/07
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Charset: UTF8
Version: Hush 2.5
What do you mean?
well I was just wondering if I could verify you are a s00per l337
I didn't read that book you sent in response to an offhanded remark,
but I am impressed you learned about paragraphs!
Now, lets focus on capital letters.
-JPwho doesn't want to strain netdev with punctuation just yet, not
to mention logic and brevity
On 10/9/07, worried security [EMAIL
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You also missed an apostrophe in this post.
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:06:47 -0400 Dude VanWinkle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to worried security [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Man, netdev, you are really
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-ww.hushtools.com/verify
Charset: UTF8
Version: Hush 2.5
So iz yer new [EMAIL PROTECTED] handl3 UTF8 or Hush 2.5?
-JPthe easily confused
___
Full-Disclosure -
On 10/8/07, Jones, Jeff (Enterprise Security)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones, Jeff (Enterprise Security) would like to recall the message,
UNSUBSCRIBE.
LOL, OK \ FYI: you cant recall messages that arent on your exchange organization
-JP
___
On 10/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dunno dude you're the one who types all the asinine shit all the
time in such smug fashions... and what picture did you forget the
attachment or something
Dude, having arguments with
On 9/29/07, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook Express blocks this by default, unless you click
the show images dialog thingie
Same with gmail
-JP
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On 9/22/07, Richard Golodner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WoriedSecurity saidblah, blah, nothing.
Do you know Gadi? Have you ever corresponded with him? He adds some valuable
knowledge to a legitimate issue that most Service Providers down to the home
user should be aware of.
I read the
Greetings,
My name is Barrister John Ade. I am in charge of the estate of the
Austrian Hacker: Adolph Oliver Nipple. Since his death on August 26th,
the estate has been left in my hands, which include some odays for
SElinux, and MS Windows Vista. Jesus (El Savior) Christ has informed
me I am to
On 8/20/07, Kyle Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't we have a discussion this morning on how this is a disclosure
mailing list not selling 0day ml?
this is a really long ssn#, are you sure it is accurate? I try to
deposit the 0days in your account, but was unsuccessful. please try
On 7/17/07, Evan Pitstick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking to become a security consultant(White hat) in a few years
and I was looking for some advice on the best certifications to get,
graduate level schools and majors, and any web sites that will continue
to help me along my path. I am
On 7/14/07, Dragos Ruiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 08:53, Gadi Evron wrote:
To paraphrase Guninski, this is still not a 0day. It is a vulnerability
being disclosed.
You're being pedantic Gadi. :-)
Actually, the correct usage of the word would be: You are being a
On 6/29/07, Kevin Finisterre (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/iPhone
Has anyone been able to use the phone on any network aside from att
yet? Is it as simple as soldering a new SIM after taking the back off?
-JPwho is going to wait till the first few iWorms make
On 6/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) The networks that DISA and friends run for various parts of the
US government. (Hint - Google for 'DISN' - most of the hits on the first
page will take you interesting places.)
Question is: Would the DISA take over local botnets in
On 6/22/07, MOHORH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ITEM #1]
md5: 0d26087e7ea2e97b48bd86ce0410cf37
sha1: 0c9c5bd561ca8382573b0fa709c842ab9ce6e2bd
sha256:
4cbdc77356a64e463986e84bd453db5b0117fc6319fe78bd8764e42d5668e7c8
No way, a troll of random hashes?
2 tickets for mass distribution of
On 6/10/07, Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 10, 2007 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes (MoRH)
To: don bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please explain the details of how useless
On 6/8/07, Kradorex Xeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 07:12, Thierry Zoller wrote:
Dear List,
I know we have a World Police but luckily we have no World laws, how
about some of you stick to things your supposed to be able to do,
security, coding whatever and leave
On 6/8/07, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, lets reply the more we can!!!
I like cake.
with Chocolate, or Vanilla icing?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and
On 6/6/07, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would this be offensive? It's a company address. Someone might send
e-mail containing company business to the address.
Would you feel the same way if it was a voicemail left on his machine?
What about a postal letter addressed to the person?
On 6/6/07, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you feel the same way if it was a voicemail left on his machine?
What about a postal letter addressed to the person?
To the company phone or address? Yes. Of course. They're company
property, there for company purposes.
Really? I have
On 6/6/07, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? I have gotten benefits and medical communications at my office
addy.
That stuff should be going to your home address, not least for this
reason.
Is should relevant? Is it a violation of HIPAA to read these
communications, even if I
Its going to take me a while, but I am gonna reverse these hashes back
into your working exploits any day now
wait!, I got one... nope
On 5/30/07, Thierry Zoller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2CC54B002C8CCE8BEA797F015991098E
On 5/30/07, Waldo Warez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh hai -
i finded yr exploitz.
in yr megan box.
can has invizible codez.
http://tinyurl.com/2s352q
kthxbye
FYI: the tinyurl leads here
http://sexoffender.dsp.delaware.gov/cgi-bin/sexoff.cgi/var/log/messages?opt=
which gives an
On 5/29/07, Kradorex Xeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To what? Your dog? The universe? an MP3 you downloaded? a program?
:P
I would guess to a PoC or chunk of vulnerable code, posted for integrity's sake
-JP
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
On 5/12/07, Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
It was brought to my attention that this list has become moderated.
So you are the recently-out-of-retirement dude or dudes that claim
they used to make up gobbles right?
I am assuming this due to the recent challenge and
On 5/3/07, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like this has turned into the Month of Officeocx bugs, since the first
3 are components sold in that package.
snore...
I know Larry, wtf is an office exploit good for? nothing thats what..
/
http://blogs.eweek.com/cheap_hack/
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dude
VanWinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:39 PM
To: Larry Seltzer
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re
On 5/2/07, Brian Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/2/07, Open Phugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Young should set up cryptome as a tor hidden service.
If Chinese dissidents can figure out how to blog, John Young should be
able to figure out how to stay on the web one way or another.
I
do you think there is any truth to the code red bit?
that has always been one of the more interesting security software
company rumors -- that they release some of the worst code out there
-JPthe easily fooled
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Q: What kind of douchebag/douchebagette falls prey to trolls on a
security mailing list meant for public disclosures of vulnerabilities?
A: More than you would expect, especially considering semi-recent postings
-JPan idiot says what?
What
-Lots of ppl on FD
From: poo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] A Botted Fortune 500 a Day
gadi.. SHUT UP
On 4/13/07, Randall M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did
On 4/4/07, Fabio Sarmento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabio S, 21
Brazil
Fabio S has added you as a friend
Is Fabio S your friend?
On 4/1/07, Matti Ranta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how to use vi what do i do
use vim :-P
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
On 3/23/07, Michael Silk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/07, Dave No, not that one Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:45:19PM +0300, 3APA3A wrote:
Dear Michael Silk,
First, by reading 'crack' I thought lady can recover full
On 3/22/07, evilrabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I called that number because I didn't think it was real snip
suuure, THATS why you called up, you deviant little tampon-lusting
monkey-man ;-)
and apprently it
wasn't. It was a real girl, but I don't belive it was the girl in the
picture. The
Does anyone know if there is a NYC 2600 group? I checked the site, but
couldnt find any listings..
-JP
On 2/28/07, Steven McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The March Chicago 2600 Meeting is near! The meeting will be Friday,
March 2nd at the Neighborhood Boys and Girls Club and will feature much
whoops!
0Crap, I guess pagerank isnt based on content as I thought it was..
http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank.html
sorry bout that.
So, correct me if I am wrong, but according to pagerank: if you have a
reciprocal link with microsoft.com about patches, this increases your
rank and because of
On 12/8/06, Louis Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to sell my web site http://www.lwang.org. It has google
pageranked 4, and full control of domain. The web server is in Czech,
it has 500M space and 5G traffic per month.
is it pageranked #4 for the word wang?
what is the czech work
On 12/1/06, Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Dave on this one. Dude Van, I thought it was illegal in the
states..? Or am I mistaken?
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/126
Also, think of this from the ISP's view, do they
really want a service port scanning their users? And
On 01 Dec 2006 08:31:11 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 12/1/06, Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, IANAL, but the TOS seem to cover the basics...
Dude snip
None-the-less, my 8-ball sees
On 01 Dec 2006 08:33:00 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a
Dude machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run
Dude 100,00 nmap scans
On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude Its obvious that anyone who hires Stonehenge Consulting services is
Dude getting someone who cant read. I never said postscanning was illegal.
Dude i said
On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states.
actually, it is. it is called legal precedence
___
On 12/1/06, Randall M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
[--
[
[Message: 11
[Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:48:38 -0500
[From: Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
[To: Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cc: full-disclosure
On 01 Dec 2006 09:36:58 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
certainly
On 11/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow
Vulnerability
http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-043.html
November 29, 2006
snip
-- Disclosure Timeline:
2005.07.07 - Digital Vaccine released
On 11/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out JP, it does in fact look confusing. We
determined during the Digital Vaccine filter creation process that a
previously released filter was robust enough to block the attack without
further modification and the
On 11/25/06, endrazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gadi,
I beg your pardon, but either I missed the purpose of this post, or you
discovered hot water :
this process of attack is a mere waste of time if one only reaches
anonymity : in order to
give google this new url to crawl, you'd have to
On 11/12/06, Georgi Guninski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fyi:
retiring from public security stuff. public flaming is not clear atm.
obviously this may change without notice.
this does not mean selling out.
No worries mate, you deserve a break.
Thanks for your contributions to the infosec
we are going to tell your professor that you are cheating!!
-JP
On 11/6/06, kijs kijs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all
Last week，I'm looking for indexing infornation for Forensics. Is not
understood very much regarding some questions：
Questions 1:
| Pr [ x(i1) x(i2)...x(ik) = a ] -
On 11/7/06, M. B. Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello gentlemen, I'm new to the list.
Hope I can contribute and learn.
Just want to share this thing I'm studying right now.
It promises to be an interesting initiative from veteran
researcher HD
This is actually a project by LMH, although
I hate to ask, but I am kinda in a Bind that has nothing to do with DNS,
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of Suse 9.0 professional? I
have tried calling novell no no avail.l Also to no avail was buying a
copy off of ebay (it was burned CD's that didnt match the MD5 and
another one was
On 11/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude VanWinkle wrote:
I hate to ask, but I am kinda in a Bind that has nothing to do with DNS,
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of Suse 9.0 professional? I
have tried calling novell no no avail.l Also to no avail was buying
On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:15:19 CST, nocfed said:
And if you have physical access then you can simply use a floppy, usb
dongle, or any other type of removable media to boot from. Once
physical access is obtained then you pretty much have
More here:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2048968,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K594
http://tinyurl.com/w2gcz
An extremely critical vulnerability in Microsoft Visual Studio 2005
could put users at risk of remote code execution attacks, the company
confirmed Nov. 1.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Redmond,
On 10/27/06, poo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*. Gadi Intelligence (very limited) You are just jealous that he has a job in infosec,and you are a 3rd shift helpdesk technician.I guess the official ratio of trolls to normal people have passed 1:1 on FD, sweet!
On 10/22/06, J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plague is an odd proof of concept backdoor keeping
tool based on the premise of using existing system
files and commands to keep and maintain a backdoor
on Linux systems. I could have modified this for
BSD, Solaris, etc., but I didn't feel
On 10/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:29:35 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even if they have ssh access, there is still nothing they can do,
except
snip
You said there when it should be their.
Err, this isnt alt.nitpickers.english, and in fact we
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
