On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Micheal Turner wh1t3h...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Idiots on Internet ranting nonsense
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
How can you have a security conference on cyber warfare when it
doesn't exist and has never taken place.
-- Forwarded message --
From: kgconfere...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:08 AM
Subject: Call for Papers: Cyber Warfare
To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
-
Call for
I've been the victim of trolls they see me as a good target to pick on
because I run the n3td3v intelligence group and i'm going to apply for
mi5. your everyday people can't run security because their ideas are
too ordinary and they come up with nothing new. don't call me a troll
i've been
sucker..
now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
heres my request:
no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in
further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
20-30 others have done so
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Col col...@gmail.com wrote:
N3td3v wrote ... i'll be applying for mi5 real soon ...
From MI5 site -
Who can I tell about my application?
This is where we really are a unique place to work. Owing to the
sensitivity of our work, discretion is vital
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, - o z - o...@hotmail.com wrote:
I will point out the faults in n3td3v's premises, read my last profile
statement:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:01 AM, n3td3v wrote:
I've been the victim of trolls they see me as a good target to pick
on
because I run the n3td3v
There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up
and closed the gap on who you actually are.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
o, and dont forget darkmyst.
u liar.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote
And you're a well known troll who's info will be found out.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
he did. hes a well known liar.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:50 PM, BlackHawk hawkgot...@gmail.com wrote:
just a question.. didn't n3td3v said I'll stop writing
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, nzerozero p nzeroze...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought you said you were going to lay off Andrew. If that is his
real name. I wish this would stop on both sides of the aisle, as it
were.
u r
You first.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:31 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Shut up scyzophrenique punk
2009/1/12 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, nzerozero p nzeroze...@gmail.com
wrote
Their PGP keys have expired =)
Sending email to US-CERT
When sending sensitive information to US-CERT via email, we encourage
you to encrypt your messages. US-CERT uses multiple public keys based
upon their purpose. If the purpose of your communication is a cyber
security incident report,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:16 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:32:09 GMT, n3td3v said:
Their PGP keys have expired =)
Expires: 2009-10-01
Wake me up in October.
To me that says January 10th 2009
___
Full-Disclosure - We
I don't know how to hack and I don't have any technical abilities I
must go now before MI5 take me away in a van and dump my body in the
sea.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted
that this profile is all incorrect and this IS some troll
winding us all up, he invariably has some mental illness. no one sane -
whether a joke or not - rants on and on and on to a bunch of people who
detest him.. maybe for a while but not for years on end.
n3td3v, get help or exit life.
On Mon, Jan 12
Everything to you on full-disclosure is fake or a lie.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't play like you post on your real name, everyone here know that it's
fake shit.
2009/1/9 andrew. wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
You know nothing.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Gomer Stackseg
faultintoler...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day to the FD list:
Security and vulnerability research ? It would really be of great
benefit to turn this list into something more than it currently is.
There is a wealth of very intelligent, creative and
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:08 AM, emm_a...@hushmail.com wrote:
We expect noise from n3td3v, and despite his ph33rsome skills he is
no match for a well written procmail rule.
I don't have any skills, it was Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who said
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya well, 3/4 of this list doesn't like you at all
A few aliases who have never talked about security you mean and just
look to stir up trouble and harass the founder of n3td3v
How do we know you're not an alias? Post your C.V...
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
At least I'm not an alias.
I just couldn't hold back any longer after reading your bullshit for month.
2009/1/9 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4
No, this is a mailing list hence we.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we know
You're alone here.
2009/1/9 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
How do we know you're not an alias? Post your C.V...
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
You're alone here, no one like you.
A few aliases who have never talked about security you mean and just
look to stir up trouble and harass the founder of n3td3v
___
Full
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
we simply care that u die. slowly and painfully.
You've got a long time to wait then ;) I'm just seeing how far you
take your abuse, it won't be long until your brain degenerates enough
and you start making actual threats.
are smart but in
fact i think you just discovered computer 2 or 3 years ago. make
something interesting or Shut the fuck off.
2009/1/9 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya well, 3/4 of this list doesn't like you at all
A few aliases
If 30 means teenager.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:30 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
You've got a long time to wait then ;)
I knew you was a some kind of teenager powered by acne:)
2009/1/9 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/9 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
If 30 means teenager.
So you reconized in some way that you're really retarded =)
At least I talk about security on a security mailing list and don't
just abuse people
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
At least I talk about security on a security mailing list and don't
just abuse people :)
Nop you talk about shit as usual, and yes you're abusing everyones email
with your spam-crap-troll.
Just get the fuck back on your
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Sysprobe sysprobe9...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin Allert wrote:
But for heavens sake - this is a SECURITY mailing list, not a discussion
board!
Please STOP this! Or this mailinglist will end like bugtraq some years ago.
This hasn't been a security list for
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Prototype This termin...@gmail.com wrote:
Ureleet is not the problem.
He never talks about security.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Prototype This termin...@gmail.com wrote:
yes but at least he dont speak about everything like he is a pro.
I wasn't aware I do that
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't think that your post is on topic of this list. And I don't
think anyone is following you - guess that's the reason why you're
*here*, again.
Also, an intellectual reply to your posting would be quite absurd.
I
it normally.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:12 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
I see cyber war being used incorrectly a national security issue.
You may not realise that it might be, but I see it as being one.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe
Never :)
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
so leave?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the average user response from full-disclosure, no capacity to
have a serious conversation.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Yes you are pretty dumb.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
o i c. were dumb and ur smart..
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:12 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't think that your post
It's some kind of peer pressure tactic he's been trying, its pretty
lame though and just ruins the list by arguing with me. I'm not like
Gobbles who released a vulnerability out of peer preassure that was
pretty lame :) You're messing with the big boys Ureleet, so maybe
after a whole year trying
Two or three web application bugs for Google Groups to secure it to
cover my own back, i'm not the kind of guy who releases bugs from
random software for no reason to look cool. I secured my Google Group,
I have no reason else to secure anything else. If a new bug for Google
Groups comes up, one
I didn't think either three of you could come up with an intellectual
reply thats on-topic with the thread, that would be asking too much
from the usual clowns who follow me around.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
is this really what ur wasting ur life, and ours
http://twitter.com/n3td3v/status/1100384047
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
War or just Cyber Protest?
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has a suspicious header
-- Forwarded message --
From: n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Subject: Israel-Gaza conflict
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ed Carp e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
They shouldn't let you post at all.
LOL! Thanks for the chuckle!
Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
instead of 'cyber war'?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:57:33 GMT, n3td3v said:
Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
instead of 'cyber war'?
No.
I think the community has been getting confused on such matters.
The community
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:57:33 GMT, n3td3v said:
Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
instead of 'cyber war'?
No.
I think
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Ed Carp e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, n3td3v wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ed Carp e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
They shouldn't let you post at all.
LOL! Thanks
And if Gadi is staying then i'm staying. OK? Looks like we're all
staying. Woop woop!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
i said id come back if u came back, fuck. learn 2 read email you cockmunch.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:29 PM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
If Gadi goes I go.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
woop woop? wtf r u? 10?
h8 him or not. at least gadi makes f'in sense.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
And if Gadi is staying then i'm staying. OK? Looks like we're all
If Gadi goes I go.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
no 1 on this list xcept for n3td3v has ever called n3td3v a
ressearcher. dont get it confused.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Steve Clement st...@localhost.lu wrote:
I saw the actual talk about it, i advise
NEVER
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Shut the fuckup dumass and quit for ever this list, as you was telling us 6
days ago.
You should read what you write.
2009/1/2 n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com
If Gadi goes I go.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, KT listcli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/2/09, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
NEVER
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Shut the fuckup dumass and quit for ever this list, as you was telling us
6
days ago.
You should read
-- Forwarded message --
From: andrew. wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Date: Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Muslim hackers roll out virtual offensive
To: n3td3v n3t...@googlegroups.com
A Morocco-based Islamic group hacked into DomainTheNet's registration
system server
a lurker on and off here for a while and while I don't post
much at least I choose not to post inaccurate statements and opinions.
Mike Preston
n3td3v wrote:
Ureleet said:
o lookie, n3td3v is lying elsewhere now
What have I lied about? It's Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who lied
Aiding script kids to get credit card numbers out of folks e-commerce
purchases. I'm sure the U.S secret service have a special interest in
this vulnerability, as so much of their time nowadays is taken up
following up on internet carders and shutting them down.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ureleet urel...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:20 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] im so done.
To: Full Disclosure full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
im leaving 4 absolutely no other reason than i am tired of replying.
thats it. dont read
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:29 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:16 GMT, n3td3v said:
Aiding script kids to get credit card numbers out of folks e-commerce
purchases.
Dear Idiot:
This is hardly an attack that the average script kiddie can pull off.
Until HD
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:05:54 GMT, n3td3v said:
On a side note: Would you really want to be an active poster on Funsec
now after what Israel is doing in Gaza right now? I think Gadi will be
keeping a low profile from now
Ureleet said:
o lookie, n3td3v is lying elsewhere now
What have I lied about? It's Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who lied,
but then people had an expectation of me because they believed the
lies that they told. Then I get some idiot on full-disclosure called
Ureleet complaining because I didn't
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
u say u r a badass hacker
When?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
fd.le...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I was wondering. Does your name 'n3td3v' mean something? Like netdev?
Network developer? Or is it just random?
It's the name of a group I run where open source intelligence gets
post
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently over 4500+ members.
Im quiet sure you've runned some scripts, no ones like you for your
personnality and no one likes/agree with your point of view , so its
impossible.
I think they are subscribed because they
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Michael Krymson krym...@gmail.com wrote:
Fact? Now you're really needing to cite some sources or backing, otherwise
this is, in fact, not fact.
Where would I get the source from if its a secret intelligence agency?
Find an MI5 spy out of a hat and tell him to
Maybe MI5 will tap me on the shoulder and offer me a job. :)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Udi Shamir udisha...@yahoo.com wrote:
There is always singing bird but the odds are thin
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2008, at 19:10, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4
MI5
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:56 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
Who will be dumb enough to give a job to a piece of shit like you ?
2008/12/22, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com:
Maybe MI5 will tap me on the shoulder and offer me a job. :)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Udi
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:33 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
u say u r a badass hacker
When?
o, i m sure someone who has more time on their hands could
The group is not for youngsters its for serious intelligencers, any
youngsters who join get banned.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Ben Preston benjamin.pres...@gmail.com wrote:
No, they subscribed because they were hoping it would be the same
un-tellectual junkshow that they get to see on FD.
Looks like you've been joe jobbed, not just the folks on that forum.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:15 PM, waveroad waveroad waver...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine is that one:
http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/search.php?searchid=903472
, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's the n3td3v?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Everett Maus them.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Could've fooled me.
n3td3v wrote:
The group is not for youngsters its for serious intelligencers, any
youngsters who join get banned.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Kevin Finisterre (lists)
kf_li...@digitalmunition.com wrote:
gtfo of fd.
No problem... I'd been away for some time now. Sorry I bothered
dropping in.
-KF
Don't worry, they tell me to GTFO of FD as well.
It seems the real researchers aren't welcome here
Real researchers who should be taken seriously aren't taken seriously anymore.
I'm leaving full-disclosure because of the abuse.
It's just turned into flames to spin people up, I don't get a chance
to talk about security or my skill set.
It's abuse after abuse after abuse.
Sorry, I can't take
This blogger that you don't take seriously is gone.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:53:29 GMT, n3td3v said:
It seems the real researchers aren't welcome here anymore.
How does that follow from your experience here, given that you claim
Won't be back on this list, n3td3v will continue elsewhere on the
internet, just not HERE.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ben Preston
benjamin.pres...@gmail.com wrote:
Bye. See you in a few months.
--
Ben
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe
:15 PM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
n3td3v continues on the internet elsewhere just not HERE.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Biz Marqee biz.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Good job faggot, its only been 3 years coming.
I believe it was Immortal Technique who said it best, Just kill
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nick FitzGerald
n...@virus-l.demon.co.uk wrote:
n3td3v wrote:
snip
What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that
only they know about and their technicians have developed their own
in-house patches for them.
If that isn't impressive
The software giant rushed out a fix for the security issue in eight
days, following its discovery that online criminals were using the
flaw to attack Internet users.
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/873
This is because they usually hold back disclosure and patch release so
the intelligence
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Bipin Gautam bipin.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
stop putting so much of attention to 0-day and possible use of it by
government to get into a terrorist pc.
if breaking into someones pc was a matter of national security
importance 0-day may provide a easy leverage
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Bipin Gautam bipin.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been hearing about, FD is getting boring with similar postings
but so less disclosures.
That is just the way the current climate is, as nothing has been post
on Bugtraq either. I think next week will be a busy week
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:20 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:30:21 +0200, James Matthews said:
Wow now there is a twitter also!
140 character limit. And we already know from long experience that
security via bumper sticker slogans doesn't work. No good can come
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, n3td3v xploita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:16 PM, jose achada achada.j...@gmail.com wrote:
no phisical barriers are imposed and nor the big media can hide you
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:24 AM, nzerozero p nzeroze...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears from the gratuitous posts on the n3td3v mailing list, sir, that
you think you are just as, or more importantly, more important than Mr.
Ranum.
Obviously it appears that neither one of you are aware of who each
, then I met
various people and realised how the world really works.
I met them on-line and in person, they wanted a slice of n3td3v, they
wanted to control the path n3td3v takes...
I told them I won't allow you to do that, but you can be with me and
we can progress together...
I still get emails from
nzerozerop is a long term friend of the n3td3v group, and he won't be
baited by you and neither will I.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Ureleet urel...@gmail.com wrote:
nzerozerop, n00p.. i get it.
give it up. u r reasoning with fail.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:59 AM, nzerozero p nzeroze
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:33 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:01:48 GMT, n3td3v said:
An interesting episode of PaulDotCom Security Weekly
This was the same PaulDotCom that you were whining about recently? Let me
guess - this episode is even *more* over the top
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Exibar exi...@thelair.com wrote:
he's excited because he's mentioned in that episode
Exibar
Yep, they accused Marcus Ranum of being n3td3v because his views were
similar to mine, they edited it out of the recorded version though.
If anyone has the live
An interesting episode of PaulDotCom Security Weekly where Marcus J.
Ranum talks about Cyber warfare.
http://media.libsyn.com/media/pauldotcom/pauldotcom-SW-episode133pt1.mp3
:)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a stupid fat kid attempting to be funny with his freinds
This is a serious mailing list not one where there are kids fooling
around, they would be too scared to post here because of the military,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said:
We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
bad, this isn't what infosec
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Ivan . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2008/db2008127_817606.htm
They say the enemy is the intelligence services of other nations, but
if they want to be taken seriously, they need to start releasing proof
to the
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok this is what this whole thing looks like to me:
They (Ureleet) try to get my attention, they don't care if I stop or
not, they flame me. If I email them in private, then they forward the
message to
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
antionline.com governmentsecurity.org
I'm only interested in specific intelligence.
Let me know,
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
You'll get bored eventually and leave us all alone to get on with our jobs.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive said it b4, and ill say it again. he leaves, i leave.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Stop this abusive non-sense and leave our inboxes.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:27 AM, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh please, don't make us laugh anymore, you dont have any job you punk.
That's why your please to pollute this mailing list you fat crack-head
bastard.
2008/12/8 n3td3v
We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
bad, this isn't what infosec should be about.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:58 AM, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow this sounds serious, what's the next step punk ?
IT tech in a daycare ?
n3td3v reversing play-doh
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:53 AM, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You started that shit at least 3 years ago.
Now as the wind blow in another way, you play the mature game ?
let us laugh, you dont know shit and you're fucking far away from any sign
of maturity, and let me tell you, this
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/9/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:53 AM, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You started that shit at least 3 years ago.
Now as the wind blow in another way, you play the mature game
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The charter is just a guideline, its got no law or authority.
Dude see this is the problem! Guidelines are like moral duties...
Relate it to, like the moral duties
of a citizen and we are (generally) obligated to act
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why dont you just quit with Ureleet? If he is that bad lets all
other(and you) ignore him like he doesnt exist. This will keep noise
low. If he bitches about your post let it be. we all have judgments
too. you neednt defend
I proposed the security industry software license to regulate attack
platforms before they get out of control. Metasploit is one of the
first, in the future there will be lots of attack platforms of the
same standard released, and nobody is taking control of the situation
at an early stage (now).
I think we're all as bad as each other, c'mon guys we shouldn't be
fighting like this in the infosec community, the hackers will be
laughing at us fighting with each other when we should be thinking up
new ways to beat the bad guys. One day maybe we can all meet up for a
beer and be good buddies,
What part of there are no moderators don't you get.
This list is run by the British intelligence service and you are a guest here.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shame on FD moderators
___
Full-Disclosure - We
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/08, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pwoouwawa ... n3td3v you do really suck.
you need to create fake users as ghost, mike.c, andrew wallace, to prove
some point ?
you're useless dude, no one like you, get
for a while
They weren't even for sale, they were GIVING THEM AWAY... a whole roll of
them, must have been over a thousand. tons of people grabbing a bunch
off the roll ROFL
Exibar
-Original Message-
From: n3td3v [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 7
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bipin Gautam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's John Cartwright got to do with an unmoderated mailing list? You
joined F-D because you thought it would be partially moderated when
someone *you~* don't agree with annoys
We here at n3td3v would like to hear your security predictions for 2009.
Last time Paul Ferguson said 2008 would be the year of web 2.0 bugs
and web 2.0 worms, that turned out to be utter rubbish (He does work
for Trend Micro afterall), but in true tradition, let's here some of
your predictions
1 - 100 of 1113 matches
Mail list logo
