How can you have a security conference on "cyber warfare" when it
doesn't exist and has never taken place.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:08 AM
Subject: Call for Papers: Cyber Warfare
To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
-
Call for Papers!
Conference
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Micheal Turner wrote:
> "Idiots on Internet ranting nonsense"
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
You first.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:31 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> Shut up scyzophrenique punk
>
> 2009/1/12 n3td3v
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ureleet wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, nzerozero p
>> > wrote:
>> >> I
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, nzerozero p wrote:
>> I thought you said you were going to lay off "Andrew". If that is his
>> real name. I wish this would stop on both sides of the aisle, as it
>> were.
>
> u r right. i did. in an effort to
And you're a well known troll who's info will be found out.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> he did. hes a well known liar.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:50 PM, BlackHawk wrote:
>> just a question.. didn't n3td3v said "I'll stop writ
There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up
and closed the gap on who you actually are.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> o, and dont forget darkmyst.
>
> u liar.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> On Mo
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, - o z - wrote:
> I will point out the faults in n3td3v's premises, read my last profile
> statement:
>
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:01 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>
>> "I've been the victim of trolls they see me as a good target to pi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Col wrote:
> N3td3v wrote "... i'll be applying for mi5 real soon ..."
>
> >From MI5 site -
>
> Who can I tell about my application?
>
> This is where we really are a unique place to work. Owing to the
> sensitivity
less air sucker..
>
> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
> spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
>
> heres my request:
>
> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in
> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at le
I've been the victim of trolls they see me as a good target to pick on
because I run the n3td3v intelligence group and i'm going to apply for
mi5. your everyday people can't run security because their ideas are
too ordinary and they come up with nothing new. don't call me
is..
>
> and even assuming that this profile is all incorrect and this IS some troll
> winding us all up, he invariably has some mental illness. no one sane -
> whether a "joke" or not - rants on and on and on to a bunch of people who
> detest him.. maybe for a while but not for
I don't know how to hack and I don't have any technical abilities I
must go now before MI5 take me away in a van and dump my body in the
sea.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted an
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:16 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:32:09 GMT, n3td3v said:
>> Their PGP keys have expired =)
>
>> Expires: 2009-10-01
>
> Wake me up in October.
To me that says January 10th 2009
___
Full-Discl
Their PGP keys have expired =)
Sending email to US-CERT
When sending sensitive information to US-CERT via email, we encourage
you to encrypt your messages. US-CERT uses multiple public keys based
upon their purpose. If the purpose of your communication is a cyber
security incident report, vulnera
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Gomer Stackseg
wrote:
> G'day to the FD list:
>
> Security and vulnerability research ? It would really be of great
> benefit to turn this list into something more than it currently is.
> There is a wealth of very intelligent, creative and humourous people
> who p
Everything to you on full-disclosure is fake or a lie.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> Don't play like you post on your real name, everyone here know that it's
> fake shit.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> 2009/1/9 andrew. wallace
>>>
>>> You know nothing.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:5
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Prototype This wrote:
> yes but at least he dont speak about everything like he is a pro.
I wasn't aware I do that
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Ho
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Prototype This wrote:
> Ureleet is not the problem.
He never talks about security.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Sysprobe wrote:
> Martin Allert wrote:
>> But for heavens sake - this is a SECURITY mailing list, not a discussion
>> board!
>>
>> Please STOP this! Or this mailinglist will end like bugtraq some years ago.
>>
>>
> This hasn't been a security list for quite some ti
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
>
>> At least I talk about security on a security mailing list and don't
>> just abuse people :)
>
> Nop you talk about shit as usual, and yes you're abusing everyones email
> with your spam-crap-troll.
> Just get the fuck back on your kiddy maili
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> 2009/1/9 n3td3v
>>
>> If 30 means teenager.
>
>
> So you reconized in some way that you're really retarded =)
At least I talk about security on a security mailing lis
If 30 means teenager.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:30 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> "You've got a long time to wait then ;)"
> I knew you was a some kind of teenager powered by acne:)
>
>
> 2009/1/9 n3td3v
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ureleet wrote:
&g
ut in
> fact i think you just discovered computer 2 or 3 years ago. make
> something interesting or Shut the fuck off.
>
> 2009/1/9 n3td3v :
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
>>> Ya well, 3/4 of this list doesn't like you at all
>>
>>
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> we simply care that u die. slowly and painfully.
You've got a long time to wait then ;) I'm just seeing how far you
take your abuse, it won't be long until your brain degenerates enough
and you start making actual threats.
__
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> You're alone here, no one like you.
A few aliases who have never talked about security you mean and just
look to stir up trouble and harass the founder of n3td3v
___
Full-Disclosure - We be
No, this is a mailing list hence "we".
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> "How do we know "
>
> You're alone here.
>
> 2009/1/9 n3td3v
>>
>> How do we know you're not an alias? Post your C.V...
>>
>> On Fri,
How do we know you're not an alias? Post your C.V...
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jan G.B. wrote:
> At least I'm not an alias.
> I just couldn't hold back any longer after reading your bullshit for month.
>
> 2009/1/9 n3td3v :
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> Ya well, 3/4 of this list doesn't like you at all
A few aliases who have never talked about security you mean and just
look to stir up trouble and harass the founder of n3td3v
___
Full-Di
Look towards yourself and Ureleet as far as thats concerned ;)
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:52 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> So why do you keep on spamming this list ?
>
>
>
>> I don't have any skills, it was Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who said
>> that.
>>
>> ___
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:08 AM, wrote:
> We expect noise from n3td3v, and despite his ph33rsome skills he is
> no match for a well written procmail rule.
>
I don't have any skills, it was Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who said that.
__
Two or three web application bugs for Google Groups to secure it to
cover my own back, i'm not the kind of guy who releases bugs from
random software for no reason to look cool. I secured my Google Group,
I have no reason else to secure anything else. If a new bug for Google
Groups comes up, one da
It's some kind of peer pressure tactic he's been trying, its pretty
lame though and just ruins the list by arguing with me. I'm not like
Gobbles who released a vulnerability out of peer preassure that was
pretty lame :) You're messing with the big boys Ureleet, so maybe
after a whole year trying yo
Yes you are pretty dumb.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> o i c. were dumb and ur smart..
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:12 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jan G.B. wrote:
>>> I don't think that your post is on topic of thi
Never :)
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> so leave?
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> This is the average user response from full-disclosure, no capacity to
>> have a serious conversation.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:15 P
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:12 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> I see "cyber war" being used incorrectly a national security issue.
>>
>> You may not realise that it might be, but I see it as being one.
>>
>> ___
>
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jan G.B. wrote:
> I don't think that your post is on topic of this list. And I don't
> think anyone is following you - guess that's the reason why you're
> *here*, again.
> Also, an intellectual reply to your posting would be quite absurd.
>
I see "cyber war" being
http://twitter.com/n3td3v/status/1100384047
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
I didn't think either three of you could come up with an intellectual
reply thats on-topic with the thread, that would be asking too much
from the usual clowns who follow me around.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Ureleet wrote:
> is this really what ur wasting ur life, and ours with? 1 fucking
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Ed Carp wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, n3td3v wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ed Carp wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
>>>
>>>> They shouldn't let you post at all.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, n3td3v wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:57:33 GMT, n3td3v said:
>>> Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
>>> instead of 'cyber war'?
>>
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:57:33 GMT, n3td3v said:
>> Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
>> instead of 'cyber war'?
>
> No.
>
>> I think the community has been getting confused
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ed Carp wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
>
>> They shouldn't let you post at all.
>
> LOL! Thanks for the chuckle!
>
Can we have conversation about my opinion on using 'cyber protest'
instead of 'cyber war'?
I think the community has b
being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has a suspicious header
-- Forwarded message ------
From: n3td3v
Date: Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Subject: Israel-Gaza conflict: Cyber War or just Cyber Protest?
To: full-
-- Forwarded message --
From: andrew. wallace
Date: Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Muslim hackers roll out virtual offensive
To: n3td3v
A Morocco-based Islamic group hacked into DomainTheNet's registration
system server today, hijacking several domain names, incl
http://garwarner.blogspot.com/2008/12/muslim-hackers-declare-cyberwar-on.html
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, KT wrote:
> On 1/2/09, n3td3v wrote:
>> NEVER
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
>>> Shut the fuckup dumass and quit for ever this list, as you was telling us
>>> 6
>>> days ago.
>>
NEVER
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> Shut the fuckup dumass and quit for ever this list, as you was telling us 6
> days ago.
> You should read what you write.
>
>
>
> 2009/1/2 n3td3v
>>
>> If Gadi goes I go.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan
If Gadi goes I go.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> no 1 on this list xcept for n3td3v has ever called n3td3v a
> ressearcher. dont get it confused.
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Steve Clement wrote:
>> I saw the actual talk about it, i advise everyone
If Gadi goes I go.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> woop woop? wtf r u? 10?
>
> h8 him or not. at least gadi makes f'in sense.
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> And if Gadi is staying then i'm staying. OK? Looks like
And if Gadi is staying then i'm staying. OK? Looks like we're all
staying. Woop woop!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> i said id come back if u came back, fuck. learn 2 read email you cockmunch.
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:29 PM, n3td3v wrote:
>> ---
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:05:54 GMT, n3td3v said:
>
>> On a side note: Would you really want to be an active poster on Funsec
>> now after what Israel is doing in Gaza right now? I think Gadi will be
>> keeping a low profil
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:29 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:16 GMT, n3td3v said:
>> Aiding script kids to get credit card numbers out of folks e-commerce
>> purchases.
>
> Dear Idiot:
>
> This is hardly an attack that the average script kiddie can pull off.
&g
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ureleet
Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:20 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] im so done.
To: Full Disclosure
im leaving 4 absolutely no other reason than i am tired of replying.
thats it. dont read anything into it, its not a vast conspiracy from
mi5 2 sh
Aiding script kids to get credit card numbers out of folks e-commerce
purchases. I'm sure the U.S secret service have a special interest in
this vulnerability, as so much of their time nowadays is taken up
following up on internet carders and shutting them down.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, El
at least not professional.
>
> I have been a lurker on and off here for a while and while I don't post
> much at least I choose not to post inaccurate statements and opinions.
>
> Mike Preston
>
> n3td3v wrote:
>> Ureleet said:
>>> o lookie, n3td3v is lying
This mailing list is no longer credible for serious researchers to be
on. I'll be elsewhere, just not "HERE".
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Biz Marqee wrote:
> you're obviously a lying cunt or you would have ceased posting to this list
> already.
>
>
> On T
n3td3v continues on the internet elsewhere just not "HERE".
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Biz Marqee wrote:
> Good job faggot, its only been 3 years coming.
>
> I believe it was Immortal Technique who said it best, "Just kill yourself!"
>
>
>
> On Tu
Won't be back on this list, n3td3v will continue elsewhere on the
internet, just not "HERE".
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ben Preston
wrote:
> Bye. See you in a few months.
>
> --
>
> Ben
>
___
Full-Disclosure
This "blogger" that you don't take seriously is gone.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:53:29 GMT, n3td3v said:
>
>> It seems the real researchers aren't welcome here anymore.
>
> How does that follow from your experienc
Real researchers who should be taken seriously aren't taken seriously anymore.
I'm leaving full-disclosure because of the abuse.
It's just turned into flames to spin people up, I don't get a chance
to talk about security or my skill set.
It's abuse after abuse after abuse.
Sorry, I can't take i
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Kevin Finisterre (lists)
wrote:
>> gtfo of fd.
>
> No problem... I'd been away for some time now. Sorry I bothered
> dropping in.
>
> -KF
Don't worry, they tell me to GTFO of FD as well.
It seems the real researchers aren't welcome here anymore.
:(
, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:12 PM, n3td3v wrote:
> Maybe it's the "n3td3v"?
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Everett Maus wrote:
>> Could've fooled me.
>>
>> n3td3v wrote:
>>>
>>> The group is not for youngsters its for serious intelligen
Looks like you've been joe jobbed, not just the folks on that forum.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:15 PM, waveroad waveroad wrote:
> Mine is that one:
> http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/search.php?searchid=903472
> http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/bigblueball-lounge/27558-n3td3vs-reputation-d.html
Maybe it's the "n3td3v"?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Everett Maus wrote:
> Could've fooled me.
>
> n3td3v wrote:
>>
>> The group is not for youngsters its for serious intelligencers, any
>> youngsters who join get banned.
>>
>
The group is not for youngsters its for serious intelligencers, any
youngsters who join get banned.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Ben Preston wrote:
> No, they subscribed because they were hoping it would be the same
> un-tellectual junkshow that they get to see on FD. You're the only
> one m
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:33 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ureleet wrote:
>>> u say u r a badass hacker
>>
>> When?
>>
>
> o, i m sure someone who has more time on their hand
MI5
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:56 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> Who will be dumb enough to give a job to a piece of shit like you ?
>
>
> 2008/12/22, n3td3v :
>>
>> Maybe MI5 will tap me on the shoulder and offer me a job. :)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at
Maybe MI5 will tap me on the shoulder and offer me a job. :)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Udi Shamir wrote:
> There is always singing bird but the odds are thin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 22, 2008, at 19:10, n3td3v wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, M
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Michael Krymson wrote:
> Fact? Now you're really needing to cite some sources or backing, otherwise
> this is, in fact, not fact.
Where would I get the source from if its a secret intelligence agency?
Find an MI5 spy out of a hat and tell him to come on full-discl
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, j-f sentier wrote:
> "Currently over 4500+ members."
>
> Im quiet sure you've runned some scripts, no ones like you for your
> personnality and no one likes/agree with your point of view , so its
> impossible.
>
I think they are subscribed because they want OSINT,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was wondering. Does your name 'n3td3v' mean something? Like netdev?
> Network developer? Or is it just random?
It's the name of a group I run where open source intelligence get
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> u say u r a badass hacker
When?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Ureleet said:
> o lookie, n3td3v is lying elsewhere now
What have I lied about? It's Robert Lemos and Neal Krawetz who lied,
but then people had an expectation of me because they believed the
lies that they told. Then I get some idiot on full-disclosure called
Ureleet complaining because
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nick FitzGerald
wrote:
> n3td3v wrote:
>
> <>
>> What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that
>> only they know about and their technicians have developed their own
>> in-house patches for them.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Bipin Gautam wrote:
> I've been hearing about, FD is getting boring with similar postings
> but so less "disclosures".
That is just the way the current climate is, as nothing has been post
on Bugtraq either. I think next week will be a busy week as people
throw aw
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Bipin Gautam wrote:
> stop putting so much of attention to 0-day and possible use of it by
> government to get into a terrorist pc.
>
> if breaking into someones pc was a matter of national security
> importance 0-day may provide a easy leverage but you really dont
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:55 PM, James Rankin wrote:
> "MI5 have their systems patched against
> flaws that are not known about by other entities"
>
> Yeah, of course they do. because writing your own patches will definitely
> make sure that your enterprise is properly supported and secured, and a
"The software giant rushed out a fix for the security issue in eight
days, following its discovery that online criminals were using the
flaw to attack Internet users."
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/873
This is because they usually hold back disclosure and patch release so
the intelligence se
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:20 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:30:21 +0200, James Matthews said:
>
>> Wow now there is a twitter also!
>
> 140 character limit. And we already know from long experience that
> security via bumper sticker slogans doesn't work. No good can come from this.
>
There
Twitter gave it to me today because someone malicious was using it.
Best wishes,
-Andrew
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM, James Matthews wrote:
> Wow now there is a twitter also!
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, n3td3v wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:16 PM, jose achada wrote:
>>> no phisical barriers are imposed and nor the big media can hide you.
>>
>> The intelligence services ha
I met
various people and realised how the world really works.
I met them on-line and in person, they wanted a slice of n3td3v, they
wanted to control the path n3td3v takes...
I told them I won't allow you to do that, but you can be with me and
we can progress together...
I still get emails fro
nzerozerop is a long term friend of the n3td3v group, and he won't be
baited by you and neither will I.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> nzerozerop, n00p.. i get it.
>
> give it up. u r reasoning with fail.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:59 AM, nzerozero p
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:24 AM, nzerozero p wrote:
> It appears from the gratuitous posts on the n3td3v mailing list, sir, that
> you think you are just as, or more importantly, more important than Mr.
> Ranum.
> Obviously it appears that neither one of you are aware of who each oth
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Exibar wrote:
> he's excited because he's mentioned in that episode
>
> Exibar
>
Yep, they accused Marcus Ranum of being n3td3v because his views were
similar to mine, they edited it out of the recorded version though.
If anyone has t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:33 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:01:48 GMT, n3td3v said:
>> An interesting episode of PaulDotCom Security Weekly
>
> This was the same PaulDotCom that you were whining about recently? Let me
> guess - this episode is even *more* over the top of
An interesting episode of PaulDotCom Security Weekly where Marcus J.
Ranum talks about Cyber warfare.
http://media.libsyn.com/media/pauldotcom/pauldotcom-SW-episode133pt1.mp3
:)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a stupid fat kid attempting to be funny with his freinds
This is a serious mailing list not one where there are kids fooling
around, they would be too scared to post here because of the military,
gover
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok this is what this whole thing looks like to me:
They (Ureleet) try to get my attention, they don't care if I stop or
not, they flame me. If I email them in private, then they forward the
message to
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Ivan . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2008/db2008127_817606.htm
>
They say the enemy is the intelligence services of other nations, but
if they want to be taken seriously, they need to start releasing proof
to th
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said:
>>> We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making info
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Bipin Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/9/08, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:53 AM, j-f sentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You started that shit at least 3 years ago.
>>> Now
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:53 AM, j-f sentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You started that shit at least 3 years ago.
> Now as the wind blow in another way, you play the mature game ?
> let us laugh, you dont know shit and you're fucking far away from any sign
> of maturity, and let me tell you, thi
We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
bad, this isn't what infosec should be about.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:58 AM, j-f sentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow this sounds serious, what's the next step punk ?
> IT tech in a daycare ?
>
t; bastard.
>
> 2008/12/8 n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> You'll get bored eventually and leave us all alone to get on with our
>> jobs.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTE
You'll get bored eventually and leave us all alone to get on with our jobs.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ive said it b4, and ill say it again. he leaves, i leave.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Bipin Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> antionline.com governmentsecurity.org
I'm only interested in specific intelligence.
Let me know,
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-di
I think we're all as bad as each other, c'mon guys we shouldn't be
fighting like this in the infosec community, the hackers will be
laughing at us fighting with each other when we should be thinking up
new ways to beat the bad guys. One day maybe we can all meet up for a
beer and be good buddies, t
I proposed the security industry software license to regulate attack
platforms before they get out of control. Metasploit is one of the
first, in the future there will be lots of attack platforms of the
same standard released, and nobody is taking control of the situation
at an early stage (now). I
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Bipin Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why dont you just quit with Ureleet? If he is that bad lets all
> other(and you) ignore him like he doesnt exist. This will keep noise
> low. If he bitches about your post let it be. we all have judgments
> too. you neednt "d
1 - 100 of 1239 matches
Mail list logo
