On Jan 1, 2008 9:51 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok so they are nothing alike because ptp/hts actually teach you stuff while
UPT was for jokes... so your post was stupid
The joke's on you since you don't have the context.
I am not a part of secreview but I realize following email
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:33:36 CST, reepex said:
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux commands, sed, and basic perl. Also why are you reading operating
system design and implementation when you do not know C?
C is not a prerequisite for understanding
everyone who is not a kiddie knows rsnake is a joke, just like anyone else
involved in his *.ackers group. If rsnake was to post to places like this
instead of lamer 'hacker'/'security' magazines then he would be ridiculed
off the list like pdp architect was. Instead I believe rsnake knows hes
if you noticed he was reading tanebaum's book about minix. If you would look
at the book you would see he relies heavily on source code and actually has
the code in the back of the book so that he can refer to it constantly. In
other books i agree you do not have to know C, but for this book, if
Your review gets a d-.
You can't add. You can't spell. Your skills appear to be limited to
rudimentary use of a browser and linkedin.com. In combination with
your undeserved and unearned sense of self importance, pretty pathetic.
You spelled Marcin's last name wrong. Great use of
Marcin Wielgoszewski here, the green consultant you mentioned but
chose not to focus on. I'm not sure what you mean by green, but
whatever. I have just finished my bachelor's degree, have done
internships with some Fortune-100's and I am constantly doing research
on my own. I also make an
Secreview, you might learn something by reading Marcin's blog.
Adam Muntner
Managing Partner
QuietMove, Inc.
Fax: 866-272-8194
http://www.quietmove.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 1, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Marcin Wielgoszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcin Wielgoszewski here, the green
On Jan 1, 2008 9:04 AM, Adam Muntner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hsve been pentesting since 98 and nearly nonstop since 2000.
You cannot spell either and you have been a 'pentester' ... does this mean
you ran nessus and other automated testing tools and call yourself a hacker?
Sent from my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam
I appreciate that you have to defend your firm, but why are you
giving the skiddie the satisfaction of even acknowledging his
existence?
Don't be fooled by the we, secreview is one person. A kid of
maybe 15 sitting in his room looking for
You are worthless.
http://www.tssci-security.com/bookshelf/
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux commands, sed, and basic perl. Also why are you reading operating
system design and implementation when you do not know C? ( Seeing as C books
are in your
reepex wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 9:04 AM, Adam Muntner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hsve been pentesting since 98 and nearly nonstop since 2000.
You cannot spell either and you have been a 'pentester' ... does this
mean you ran nessus and other automated testing
On Jan 1, 2008 7:33 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.tssci-security.com/bookshelf/
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux commands, sed, and basic perl. Also why are you reading operating
system design and implementation when you do not
You're right. I'm new and young and I'll be the first to admit it. We
can't all be born security gurus, and I'm not trying to hide that, but
me aside... what have you done besides hide behind your gmail account
and troll FD?
Thanks for pointing out those two pages, two pages out of 100's that
That would be an incorrect assumption. As I mentioned in the followup
email - I types my response on my phones touchscreen, on a moving train.
D- on your reading comprehension skills.
F on your need to diss, anonymously.
F- on if there is such a thing based on your suggestion of suicide for
your attitude sure has changed since your last post. Maybe you shouldn't
sound so commanding on a real list next time and instead stick to your local
2600 meetings.
On Jan 1, 2008 1:08 PM, Marcin Wielgoszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. I'm new and young and I'll be the first to
So what exactly do you do then? Please explain your skills to us since you
conveinenly avoided my questions about your metasploit and auto hacking
skills.
On Jan 1, 2008 1:33 PM, Adam Muntner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be an incorrect assumption. As I mentioned in the followup
email
On Dec 31, 2007 2:13 PM, secreview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure about our readers, but to us at Secreview that hardly
makes Adam an IT Security Expert.
But wait, now we have a discrepancy...
Pardon me, but who is this? secreview? Who is behind this email
address? If you don't identify
On Dec 31, 2007 9:36 PM, Andre Gironda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sites such as PullThePlug, HackThisSite, etc all borrowed ideas from
UPT,
what exactly was borrowed? because I am pretty sure none of the hackthissite
founders were around when this magazine was.
There are few PCI ASV's or
Readers (and haters)
Just so we're clear, we've offered QuietMove a second shot at being
reviewed. As a result we're going to remove our existing review and
release a new review in short time. As usual, we'll do our best to
make sure that the reviews are truthful and honest. To date,
On Jan 1, 2008 9:53 PM, Andre Gironda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't do a direct comparison, but I thought UPT was more about being
funny than being seriously
challenging.
ok so they are nothing alike because ptp/hts actually teach you stuff while
UPT was for jokes... so your post was
On Jan 1, 2008 9:35 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QuietMove has not provided us with any information that contradicts
anything that we've written in our origional post. We're still
waiting for answers back from them.
It is probably because they, like everyone else, do not care about
On Jan 1, 2008 8:51 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
So you list 5 tools they use then mention they modify a javascript
library... So basically they use automated tools and are former web
developers ... sound pretty hardcore
this is sufficient skill for lucrative security audit /
QuiteMove, located at http://www.quitemove.com is a small Professional
IT Security Services Provider that offers Training services, Incident
Response Services, Web Application Security Services and Penetration
Testing Services. QuiteMove was started by Adam Munter in 2006 along
with Jeffrey
Well, I guess this settles how you should be judged.
Spelling is hard, especially when complaining about somebody else.
Is it quitemove.com or quietmove.com? Not quite, eh?
-- bob
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, secreview wrote:
QuiteMove, located at http://www.quitemove.com is a small
snip hack snip snip
QuiteMove
http://www.quitemove.com
QuietMove
snip snip hack snip
A tad more attention to details would be nice.
Good thing you're not graded on spelling here. C-.
Happy New Year,
Randy
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
25 matches
Mail list logo
