> What about a entirely separate Full-Disclosure-Admins list?
Quite apart from the fact that the guy in charge of the list has already
said that this is not going to happen, and that any further discussion on
this point is irrelevant - you're still not actually gaining anything.
I would have thoug
L PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Todd Towles
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Towles
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists
Implementing it could be quite easy actually.
Setup a PHP voting booth, where someone adds the names of all the current FD
subscribers, with the length of time that they've been subscribed for, and then
set this to update itself, via cron or whatever means you prefer.
Have the voting booth requir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FD can't be fully moderated because this will become bugtraq xss and sql
injection land hehe, with vulnerabilities posted with a big delay
between sending and publishing, sometimes it can take up than 3-4 days
to publish a vulnerability on bugtraq alre
> Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
> of keeping
> track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
> spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
> date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user
> banned, then so
>
Todd Towles wrote:
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
is to have the user banned, t
On 12/15/05,12/15/05, Andy Lindeman <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the ultimate goal is to keep the "crap" factor down, moderationwill only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the noise ratio.--A
a) moderate one user (turns list into bugtraq)
b) real disclosure is full-di
If the ultimate goal is to keep the "crap" factor down, moderation
will only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the
noise ratio.
--A
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of keeping
> track of
> Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
> of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
> a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
> members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
> is to have the user banned, then so be i
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of keeping
track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user banned, then so
be it...
11 matches
Mail list logo
