Simon Smith wrote:
Why would you do this?
For all Nmap fans, our group have implemented Nmap Online service.
Its address is http://nmap-online.com/. The interface allows you to perform
custom
Because you like lawers and being in court?
___
thus Schanulleke spake:
Simon Smith wrote:
Why would you do this?
For all Nmap fans, our group have implemented Nmap Online service.
Its address is http://nmap-online.com/. The interface allows you to perform
custom
Because you like lawers and being in court?
lawyers are wimps :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Greg wrote:
I don't wish to upset anyone but that answer has to be the craziest FIRST
port of call approach I have seen used. I get plenty of those sorts of
calls. I take about 30 seconds time on the phone for almost all of them. I
say Pull
-Original Message-
From: Christian Khark Lauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2006 5:22 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Greg wrote:
I don't
1) I'm sure none of you can imagine this, but sometimes running and startup
configs aren't the same. YES it's TRUE! So, your approach could be
disastrous and is really ill advised.
2) Nmap may not give reliable results from all sites. Surely you've
encounted ACLs that caused erroneous nmap
Why would you do this?
On 11/28/06 3:19 AM, David Matousek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For all Nmap fans, our group have implemented Nmap Online service.
Its address is http://nmap-online.com/. The interface allows you to perform
custom
Nmap scans from our server with only a few
On 12/5/06, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you do this?
Well, for one, sometimes you need to do a port scan when you're not in
front of a system that has nmap installed on it. I get a call about
once every couple of months, why can't I get into my email server
that's sitting
-Original Message-
From: Ed Carp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2006 2:06 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Cc: David Matousek
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
On 12/5/06, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you do
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Greg wrote:
I don't wish to upset anyone but that answer has to be the craziest FIRST
port of call approach I have seen used. I get plenty of those sorts of
calls. I take about 30 seconds time on the phone for almost all of them. I
say Pull the power plug out of the
On 12/5/06, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't wish to upset anyone but that answer has to be the craziest FIRST
port of call approach I have seen used. I get plenty of those sorts of
Who said it was the first thing that was tried? And you just can't
pull the plug on a router in a
first of all, IANAL, but the TOS seem to cover the basics... However, I am
unsure whether they would hold up under strict legal scrutiny. As far as I
can tell, they may hold up under US criminal law, but not under civil law,
as tort law has its own wonderful little eccentricities. The best
I agree with Dave on this one. Dude Van, I thought it was illegal in the
states..? Or am I mistaken? Also, think of this from the ISP's view, do they
really want a service port scanning their users? And look at it this way,
said target has a proxy server on it, attacker proxies into the proxy and
Matousek
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:19 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
Hello,
For all Nmap fans, our group have implemented Nmap Online service.
Its address is http://nmap-online.com/. The interface allows you to perform
custom
Nmap scans from
On 12/1/06, Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Dave on this one. Dude Van, I thought it was illegal in the
states..? Or am I mistaken?
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/126
Also, think of this from the ISP's view, do they
really want a service port scanning their users? And
Service unavailable. Please try again later.
That was quick!
Col.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Maybe it got hacked?
...I wonder if someone probably didn't like all the portscans they got
from it (thinks of Microsoft) and took it out?
David.
Col [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/1/2006 7:48 am
Service unavailable. Please try again later.
That was quick!
Col.
://www.shadowserver.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Matousek
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:19 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
Hello,
For all Nmap fans, our group have
...I wonder if someone probably didn't like all the portscans they got
from it (thinks of Microsoft) and took it out?
David.
Heck .. how to portscan Microsoft has been in the Nmap man page for ages
(even in the help you get when you execute it without arguments) ..
although it's not in
On 01 Dec 2006 08:31:11 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 12/1/06, Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, IANAL, but the TOS seem to cover the basics...
Dude snip
None-the-less, my 8-ball sees
On 01 Dec 2006 08:33:00 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a
Dude machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run
Dude 100,00 nmap scans
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 12/1/06, Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, IANAL, but the TOS seem to cover the basics...
Dude snip
None-the-less, my 8-ball sees litigation in their future.
Dude portscanning isnt illegal in the states
If it can be
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a
Dude machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run
Dude 100,00 nmap scans from a distributed botnet and take down their
Dude server, thats illegal.
It's
On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude Its obvious that anyone who hires Stonehenge Consulting services is
Dude getting someone who cant read. I never said postscanning was illegal.
Dude i said it
On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states.
actually, it is. it is called legal precedence
___
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com
wrote:
If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states.
Dude actually, it is. it is called legal
On 12/1/06, Randall M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
[--
[
[Message: 11
[Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:48:38 -0500
[From: Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap Online
[To: Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cc: full-disclosure
On 01 Dec 2006 09:36:58 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Dude == Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
certainly
On 12/1/06, Mike Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, IANAL, but the TOS seem to cover the basics... However, I am
unsure whether they would hold up under strict legal scrutiny. As far as I
can tell, they may hold up under US criminal law, but not under civil law,
as tort law has its
Hello,
For all Nmap fans, our group have implemented Nmap Online service.
Its address is http://nmap-online.com/. The interface allows you to perform
custom
Nmap scans from our server with only a few limitations in the syntax.
The service is free and can be used immediately, no registration is
29 matches
Mail list logo
