> Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first
> amendment..
There is nothing anywhere in any of US law, whether it be the bill of
rights or case law/judicial review which *modifies* those rights. More
over, you probably mean to reference the 4th amendment, not the
Am 06/12/2013 01:08 AM, schrieb Justin Ferguson:
>> Their Naurs devices get my info even if I store my data in Germany
>> (My link to Germany goes through EEUU).
>
> And you think the BND does what for a living exactly?
Ah, I have the joy of knowing some of the fellows over there in Pullach
and
Thw commercial espionage angle is another interesting aspect of this
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/10014923405/is-us-using-prism-to-engage-commercial-espionage-against-germany-others.shtml
On 13/06/2013 3:08 AM, "Michael Hallgren" wrote:
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/news/intern
http://www.internetsociety.org/news/internet-society-statement-importance-open-global-dialogue-regarding-online-privacy
mh
Le 12/06/2013 16:05, William Reyor a écrit :
> * are protected <-- fixed that for ya.
>
> - William Reyor
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:01 AM, laurent gaffie wrote:
>
>> is pro
* are protected <-- fixed that for ya.
- William Reyor
On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:01 AM, laurent gaffie wrote:
> is protected
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by S
Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first
amendment..
https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity
2013/6/11 Philip Whitehouse
>
> Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the second
> amendment rather than the first one...
>
> Well this relates mai
This has been came into public attendtion recently, but it has been
published earlier in March 2013 by Bruce Schneider (the twofish crypto
algo developer).
Read here:
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/03/fbi_secretly_sp.html
On 6/12/13, Philip Whitehouse wrote:
> The problem is we se
Uhh, discount! That guy, what's his name, was a traitor anyway.
You just cannot believe people.
2013/6/12 Ivan .Heca
> Maybe all is forgiven if they discount enough
>
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/061113-google-amazon-cloud-270730.html?hpg1=bn
> A Canadian and what appears to be a
The problem is we seem to have neither agents with a conscience or legislation
difficult to change for the spooks and their puppets.
So even if we did have functioning privacy organisations willing to take on the
government (Hacked Off being a notable exception but even that was primarily
motiv
Justin,
> illegally (by AU standards) accessed and passed onto ASD or the like,
> however, if AU data stayed within AU, there is no chance in fuck your
> out of control govt can access it to pass onto our spies, nor any way
> our spies can locally access that data without a court order,
> someth
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:49 -0400, Justin Ferguson wrote:
> > some parts like certain eastern European countries might have less, but the
> > NSA makes the Stasi look like a boys choir.
>
> Now, that, that is rubbish. I'm assuming you're German. You're doing
> your countries history a disservic
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:10:53 -0400, Justin Ferguson said:
> A Canadian and what appears to be a British subject discussing the not
> so finer points of American legislation. I'm sure at some point the
> irony will become apparent.
To be fair - they appear to know more about the US Constitution tha
> Truth be told, that statement is utter rubbish,
Hah.
http://www.dw.de/intelligence-service-report-confirms-bnd-spied-on-reporters/a-2032833
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/How_German_intelligence_infiltrated_Focus_magazine
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-world-from-berlin-bnd-agents-kn
Maybe all is forgiven if they discount enough
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/061113-google-amazon-cloud-270730.html?hpg1=bn
A Canadian and what appears to be a British subject discussing the not
so finer points of American legislation. I'm sure at some point the
irony will become apparent.
A Canadian and what appears to be a British subject discussing the not
so finer points of American legislation. I'm sure at some point the
irony will become apparent.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Philip Whitehouse wrote:
>
> Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the second
> What? I am not from EEUU, so why should I be happy with this? I have my own
> constitution and it is been ignored and crushed be EEUU,
> Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Dropbox, Amazon?, UK etc.
Spies spy, amazing I know. It's generally illegal when one gets
caught, thus the danger inherent in non-of
> Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the second
> amendment rather than the first one...
>
Well this relates mainly to the fourth amendment, not the first. The first
tends to get decent coverage. Publication of the leak by journalists is the
only under the realm of the f
What? I am not from EEUU, so why should I be happy with this? I have my
own constitution and it is been ignored and crushed be EEUU, Google,
Yahoo, Microsoft, Dropbox, Amazon?, UK etc.
Their Naurs devices get my info even if I store my data in Germany (My
link to Germany goes through EEUU). SS
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:15 PM, laurent gaffie
wrote:
> Why is the Prims program such a big deal today? Most of us knew about
> echellon and the patriot act didnt we?
There is more opportunity for action once the press is helping the
public understand the basics. Before this, it was more diffi
Justin Ferguson wrote:
"Think about it: In order for cloud computing solutions to be seen as
viable alternatives to more traditional desktop solutions users --
personal and business users alike -- need to be 100 percent certain
their data is secure."
WTF? Most Most Small- to Medium-Sized Business
Ignoring that I'm replying to this from an ec2 box and thus the cloud
is obviously not dead. We can't accept the first premise:
"Think about it: In order for cloud computing solutions to be seen as
viable alternatives to more traditional desktop solutions users --
personal and business users alike
+1 (including +1 for the 'rant' about cloud)
Daniel Preussker
[ Security Consultant, Network & Protocol Security and Cryptography
[ LPI & Novell Certified Linux Engineer and Researcher
[ +49 178 600 96 30
[ dan...@preussker.net
[ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x87E736968E490A
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:15 PM, laurent gaffie
> wrote:
>> Why is the Prims program such a big deal today? Most of us knew about
>> echelon and the patriot act didn't we? This program was unconstitutional at
>> the first place and should
A number of cloud provider business plans will need tweaking now
On 11/06/2013 11:30 AM, "Jeffrey Walton" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:15 PM, laurent gaffie
> wrote:
> > Why is the Prims program such a big deal today? Most of us knew about
> > echelon and the patriot act didn't we? T
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:15 PM, laurent gaffie
wrote:
> Why is the Prims program such a big deal today? Most of us knew about
> echelon and the patriot act didn't we? This program was unconstitutional at
> the first place and should have raised indignation when it was approved at
> that time...
Why is the Prims program such a big deal today? Most of us knew about
echellon and the patriot act didnt we? This program was unconstinutional at
the first place and should have raised indignation when it was approved at
that time...
Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the
http://m.blogs.computerworld.com/cloud-storage/22305/why-prism-kills-cloud
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
27 matches
Mail list logo
