Come now Mr Wallace, answer my previous question in this thread. You've been
posting on FD all day so there's no excuse. I'll even include it for you now
incase you missed it the first time.
So n3td3v, I understand your `group` is still shut off in its own little
world. But I wonder why you don't
2009/1/11 andrew. wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com:
Trolls target people they know they can get a reaction out of thats
why
you are here.
You made it again - another reply ;)
/diaf
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
So n3td3v, I understand your group is still shut off in its own little
world. But I wonder why you don't make the archives available. Perhaps it
might assist you in regaining your credibility on FD and slow/stop some of
the arguing. This is an actual serious inquiry.
I'll be honest, I'm expecting
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:58:34 EST, vulcanius said:
I'll be honest, I'm expecting either no response at all (which will pretty
much confirm it doesn't exist) or one of these... There's too much
sensitive information.
Sensitive info shared with 4,500+ others is no longer sensitive. It's
Hence why it's with the list of other silly excuses.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:06 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:58:34 EST, vulcanius said:
I'll be honest, I'm expecting either no response at all (which will
pretty
much confirm it doesn't exist) or one of
We're a mailing list of government, business and academia folks pretty
much the same as here. We monitor threat reports and give analysis
from time to time on what's going on and offer advice to folks. Why
would you be against us?
I can't help if Robert Lemos, Neal Krawetz gave false reports
andrew.wallace wrote:
We're a mailing list of government, business and academia folks pretty
much the same as here. We monitor threat reports and give analysis
from time to time on what's going on and offer advice to folks. Why
would you be against us?
Because you are a complete moron who
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:09:45 GMT, andrew.wallace said:
I can't help if Robert Lemos, Neal Krawetz gave false reports about
n3td3v, that seems to have damaged us a lot and having to defend my
position constantly to a bunch of aliases on full-disclosure because
they believed something that was
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:09:45 GMT, andrew.wallace said:
I can't help if Robert Lemos, Neal Krawetz gave false reports about
n3td3v, that seems to have damaged us a lot and having to defend my
position constantly to a bunch of
You're a troll bitch, stop sniffing crack you loose your memory, i guess
someone should make an wikipedia entry or something, just to remind you what
kind of piece of shit you are.
Now you see that no one likes you here, so stop crying on such useless
topics as this one, and get the fuck out.
Another *actual* troll I forgot to mention...
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:32 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
You're a troll bitch, stop sniffing crack you loose your memory, i guess
someone should make an wikipedia entry or something, just to remind you what
kind of piece of shit you
i'm just tired as many here, to see you spamming shit around.
You said, you will leave, and as a kid, you came back 5 days later,
so let me guess:
- your mailing-list is annoying ?
- you went out of crack for a week ?
2009/1/11 andrew. wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Another *actual*
Keep trolling it will do you no good, you didn't read what I initially
said back off now not only are you not making
any difference to me but you are only ruining the full-disclosure
mailing list by the constant back and forward arguing thats going on
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:00 PM, j-f sentier
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:54 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:09:58 GMT, you said:
I'm not a troll and only serious researchers are subscribed to the
n3td3v mailing list group.
What does the following read like? A serious researcher? Or a troll/idiot?
You're doing
LOL, if someone is ruining FD it's you with these kind of stupid post twice
a day :
Why are you against n3td3v?,
They don't realise I might work for MI5,
Full-Disclosure wouldn't let me post this message,
n3td3v is big in the security community protecting the UK against the
threats.,
etc
Defending myself against *actual* trolls like you.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL, if someone is ruining FD it's you with these kind of stupid post twice
a day :
Why are you against n3td3v?,
They don't realise I might work for MI5,
Full-Disclosure
So you have to ask yourself this simple question :
Why everyone hates you ?
Why you ?
2009/1/11 andrew. wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Defending myself against *actual* trolls like you.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL, if someone is
You don't know everyone, you only know the other *actual* trolls you
social with on full-disclosure and have grouped up with to cause
trouble against me.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:23 PM, j-f sentier j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
So you have to ask yourself this simple question :
Why everyone hates
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:14:36 GMT, you said:
I'm not clueless on this list everything I say is pretty accurate.
Go back and re-read every post you've written lately that contains the strings
'MI5' or 'Mossad', and ponder how the rest of us see it.
pgpUJPUvZNX5n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:41 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:14:36 GMT, you said:
I'm not clueless on this list everything I say is pretty accurate.
Go back and re-read every post you've written lately that contains the strings
'MI5' or 'Mossad', and ponder how the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey sweetie,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:23:12 -0500 j-f sentier
j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
So you have to ask yourself this simple question :
Why everyone hates you ?
sexyazngrl69 is definitely someone that loves not hates n3td3v.
you're understanding
So you have to ask yourself this simple question :
Why everyone hates you ?
sexyazngrl69 is definitely someone that loves not hates n3td3v.
you're understanding of everyone is off.
In this case, everyone means a majority.
___
Full-Disclosure - We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
that has never been an acceptable definition for everyone.
*hugs*
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:04:33 -0500 j-f sentier
j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
So you have to ask yourself this simple question :
Why everyone hates you ?
sexyazngrl69 is definitely
sexyazngrl69 is definitely someone that loves not hates n3td3v.
http://www.xanga.com/guestbook.aspx?user=seXyazNgRl69
i can understand that ;)
2009/1/11 sexyazngr...@mac.hush.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
that has never been an acceptable definition for everyone.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hehe are you trolling me? *giggle*
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:08:38 -0500 j-f sentier
j.sent...@gmail.com wrote:
sexyazngrl69 is definitely someone that loves not hates n3td3v.
http://www.xanga.com/guestbook.aspx?user=seXyazNgRl69
i can understand
Direct quote from n3td3v: I've been watching too many movies and using
illegal substances. Time for me to go now. -
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-August/036365.html
So you want to be mi5, but your a drug addict? Sorry they don't employ
people with your state of mind.
26 matches
Mail list logo
