-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FD can't be fully moderated because this will become bugtraq xss and sql
injection land hehe, with vulnerabilities posted with a big delay
between sending and publishing, sometimes it can take up than 3-4 days
to publish a vulnerability on bugtraq
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Towles
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists
:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Towles
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists
Why not do
What about a entirely separate Full-Disclosure-Admins list?
Quite apart from the fact that the guy in charge of the list has already
said that this is not going to happen, and that any further discussion on
this point is irrelevant - you're still not actually gaining anything.
I would have
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
is to have the user banned, then so be it...
If the ultimate goal is to keep the crap factor down, moderation
will only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the
noise ratio.
--A
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of keeping
track of
On 12/15/05,12/15/05, Andy Lindeman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the ultimate goal is to keep the crap factor down, moderationwill only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the noise ratio.--A
a) moderate one user (turns list into bugtraq)
b) real disclosure is
Todd Towles wrote:
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
is to have the user banned,
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping
track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user
banned, then so
be
