Title: Yahoo! Research Multiple vulnerabilites
Authors: Simo64 and Simo Ben youssef
Contacts : simo64_at_morx_org / simo_at_morx_org
Discovered: 02 Aout 2006
Published: 17 Aout 2006
MorX Security Research Team
Original Advisory:
http://www.morx.org/YahooResearchMultiple.txt
http://www.morx.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1152-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
August 18th, 2006
==
Secunia Research 18/08/2006
- AOL Insecure Default Directory Permissions -
==
Table of Contents
Affected
Hi,
I found out that some machines in a clients network use the default keys
that came with WebSphere because it is too hard to get the new keys
registred with the company.
Does anybody know what risks this opens them up to?
Schanulleke
___
On 8/15/06, Edward Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad somebody said it. I'm fed up of the whole if you don't like
them, don't read them crap.
Fuck you all. I'm going to Bugtraq.
Right--you don't like the list, so you don't read it. You are acting
in accordance with the mantra with
Dear Colleague,
I invite you to submit a proposal for presentation at WSIP/WSSC. The
proposal form is downloadable at:
http://www.unatekconference.com/papersIntrusion2007.php
The two co-located conferences: the World Summit on Intrusion Prevention
and the 2nd Annual Web Services Security
Apologies for adding to the noise yet again.
Eliah Kagan wrote:
Jason appears to be calling for a dual-tracking system, whereby people
who post lots of content that others don't like (or that just Jason
doesn't like) use two email addresses--one for the content that people
will wait to block,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
I've seen some fuss about the technique called tempest lately. Some
people claim it would be the thing in modern security. This bugs me
somehow because first of all I think it is way to much of an effort
compared to the more casual
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:45 +0200, Paul Sebastian Ziegler wrote:
Can anybody tell me how far evolved this technique is today and who
uses
it? Maybe some reference to a whitepaper or something similar. Would
be
great.
Other than the NSA, you mean?
By the way, Tempest did/does not just refer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Joe Barr wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:45 +0200, Paul Sebastian Ziegler wrote:
Can anybody tell me how far evolved this technique is today and who
uses
it? Maybe some reference to a whitepaper or something similar. Would
be
great.
Other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1153-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
August 18th, 2006
Paul Sebastian Ziegler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
Can anybody tell me how far evolved this technique is today and who uses
it? Maybe some reference to a whitepaper or something similar. Would be
great.
Did you mean Van Eck Phreaking... EM eavesdropping,
- darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
The signal/noise ratio here has really gotten unbearable in the last
few
months. We can deal with most undesired mail from repeat posters with
a
filter, but the crapfloods need to be dealt with in a more drastic
fashion.
-d
--
darren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks to everyone, I got enough info to suffice.
It's good to see that just asking a question still provides an answer
without paying thousands of dollars or sliding into several networks.
Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
forth: getting angry if someone spots you
fifth: insulting for free (i did not, you uneducated subject).
if you do not stand jokes, you're definitely better off any mailing list.
go back to school and learn some politeness.
- Original Message -
From: Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL
I had not seen a realistic, working public example until I picked up on this just the other day. Granted, it's sketchy on details, but assuming it is a honest example it is impressive.
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2006/03/09/video-eavesdropping-demo-at-cebit-2006/Everything else seemed to
quoth the Ajay Pal Singh Atwal:
- darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
The signal/noise ratio here has really gotten unbearable in the last
few
months. We can deal with most undesired mail from repeat posters with
a
filter, but the crapfloods need to be dealt with in a more
Hello,
My server was recently hacked through a vulnerable web application. What
I found was a perl IRC bot. It was downloaded from
http://72.20.41.7/~krang/join.txt
It connects to 66.152.173.198 port 6698, joins #join
You should use nickname krang, sky or chip for the bots to accept
commands.
On 8/18/06, ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
forth: getting angry if someone spots you
fifth: insulting for free (i did not, you uneducated subject).
Your email forensics skills are only matched by your command of the
english language, and only surpassed by your deductive reasoning.
-JP
19 matches
Mail list logo
