TCPA, the Telecommunications Communications Privacy Act.
You must have this name wrong. Apart from the redundancy, I Googled it and got nothing.
Do you mean the Telemarketing and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)?
___
Full-Disclosure - We
Hi,
i got an intersting cmd-script to gather shares in a windows network
without the need to install something.
Sorry for quoting long lines.
@echo off
:
:
: -=[ (c) 2003-10-31 MrB ]=-
:
: collect the name of accessible Windows(R) shares
:
: syntax: openshare 192.168.0
: - scans all ip
I think the kind of approach Kurt has suggested can only realistically
work in corporate and institutional environments (and with the
occasional well-disciplned individual), where it would also be
realtively easy to further restrict the odds of sustaining damage via
this entry route by
TCPA, the Telecommunications Communications Privacy Act.
http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/palladium
That's Trusted Computing Platform Alliance and totally off the point.
LJS
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
bascially looking for sync-src-1.00.tbz. That message was posted to this
avail on infected hosts
This is how I came to be in possession of it:
nc -l -p 3127 doomjuice.dump
You will probably want to write a
loop to restart netcat because it exits after a successful transfer.
Now THIS is an example of why I subscribe to this list. Good work!
G
On or about 2004.03.06 19:40:24 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
I recently read somewhere that mydoom.c included the source code for the a
variant. Being the curious type, I wanted to see it. During my
Now I'm confused...
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:43:03AM -0800, morning_wood wrote:
From: morning_wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] mydoom.c information
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:43:03 -0800
bascially looking for sync-src-1.00.tbz. That message was
Now I'm confused...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /storage/virii] $ nc -h
GNU netcat 0.7.1, a rewrite of the famous networking tool.
Basic usages:
connect to somewhere: nc [options] hostname port [port] ...
listen for inbound:nc -l -p port [options] [hostname] [port] ...
tunnel to somewhere:
, so you obviously didn't read Curt's solution for *his* network in
context as well.
Slip away and think up some more witty comments ... Better yet, go back
and read what was written and maybe show a little mutual respect. We
don't want to know how big your penis is...
-Original
Jay D. Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I often find the grammar used in security advisories and briefs to be
confusing, and I'm forced to wonder if the wording is deliberate.
Historically, when security companies have made claims that they could
not verify, they have been dealt with in a very
Sorry, shouldn't write this stuff when I am not looking
at primary sources.
ECPA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
Title 18 USC 2701
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Larry Seltzer wrote:
TCPA, the Telecommunications Communications Privacy Act.
You must have this name wrong. Apart from the
Hello,
... Limiting ourselves to three-character-only, non-case
sensitive ASCII alphanumerics, that is a one in 3^36 chance.
Sorry :) but it is 26^3 that is shomehow smaller 8)
Best regards,
Jorge
--
Jorge Daza - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG key available
-- -
Hello,
why not solve the problem the way it is handled in other environments ?
We have two people that do not necessarily trust each other, and they
want to share a file. We can create trusted third parties to verify
origin, store and maybe even analyze the file.
A the receiver
B the sender
C
As I recall the -L option (persistent listener) only works on the windows
port.
On Sunday 07 March 2004 20:44, John Sage wrote:
Now I'm confused...
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:43:03AM -0800, morning_wood wrote:
From: morning_wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
heh..
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:01:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] mydoom.c information
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:01:01 -0800 (PST)
See comments inserted in reply:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, morning_wood wrote:
ah..
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:20:56PM -0800, morning_wood wrote:
From: morning_wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Sage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] mydoom.c information
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:20:56 -0800
Now I'm confused...
[EMAIL
Gyrniff wrote:
As I recall the -L option (persistent listener) only works on the windows
port.
If you want it for Unix:
--- nc110/netcat.c 1996-03-20 16:38:04.0 -0800
+++ netcat.c2004-03-07 18:17:55.0 -0800
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
#include errno.h
#include signal.h
Heh heh heh. How could I be using the Windows version if I am running
Bash on Linux?
:)
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, John Sage wrote:
heh..
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:01:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] mydoom.c
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:47, Chris Eagle wrote:
As I recall the -L option (persistent listener) only works on the windows
port.
If you want it for Unix:
How about?
while true;do nc -l -p 1234;done
Forrest? Trees?
-Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
No body, No subject. No From:, No To:
Hmmm. Ya think comcast has a misconfigured SMTP host someplace?
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 03:45:45 + (GMT)
X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum
requirements
X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium
Received: from
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 01:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with that is that there is no incrementing counter. The
output never gets written to file, since nc sends data directly to stdout.
Which is why I had an 'x' variable in my loop - it conveniently increments
by one each
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Frank Knobbe wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:47, Chris Eagle wrote:
As I recall the -L option (persistent listener) only works on the windows
port.
If you want it for Unix:
How about?
while true;do nc -l -p 1234;done
The problem with that is that there is
Jorge Daza [EMAIL PROTECTED] to me:
... Limiting ourselves to three-character-only, non-case
sensitive ASCII alphanumerics, that is a one in 3^36 chance.
Sorry :) but it is 26^3 that is shomehow smaller 8)
Whoops -- yes, though I did say alpha_numerics_ so expect you meant
36^3...
24 matches
Mail list logo
