Do you have a site, with maybe comparisons between the two? I am always looking for
bigger and better things :-)
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:39:27 -0400
Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2003-09-16T11:25:47 Ron DuFresne:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, christopher neitzert wrote:
1. upgrade to lsh.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:49:38 -0500
Elvedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If you want this topic to die, please stop
replying to it. All I know, anybody who replies to this will go on my block list,
this is just as good as spam.
Practice what you preech, why did you reply then?
As for going
This was posted to bugtraq.
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/333451/2003-08-13/2003-08-19/0
The author of the software claims any machine running this
Execution Flow Control (EFC) program is 100%. I think 100% is a tad bit arrogant, and
I can't wait till he has to eat his words. The
I think they rules that out. At least thats what I have heard on the news.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:35:34 -0400
rrm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard this rumor that something got struck by lightning in Canada
that caused all these problems?
I don't subscribe to bugtraq for the reasons you listed, vendor annoucing, and a lot
of material that just isn't interesting to me. Usually there are a couple people
subscribed to both, so if there is anything important posted to bugtraq, it usually
gets reposted here.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003
I would also like to know, since I though the remote computer would experience some
sort of DoS instead of exploitation if the wrong return address was used.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:20:20 +0200
Knud Erik Højgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
morning_wood wrote:
[snip]
THIS IS NOT THE CASE...
This childish flaming is why everyone wishes death upon you donnie, please get a clue.
There are more constructive ways to make a point, please try your best to try them.
You might be suprised how much less hated you might become around here.
-Shanphen
Oh yeah, please do try the tools drop
Yes but what affect does this have on the server? How does it comprimise security? Can
you use this to DoS the server? Can you use this to gain access to areas on the server
otherwise not available?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:18:05 -0700
morning_wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since were on the
So why not show one of these legitimate examples instead of the overused window popup
script?
It would just be easier to ascertain the level of severity if an actual DoS string or
this trusted internal call was exploited.
I am sure there are a lot of forms that can be a victim of a xss string,
Here is supposedly a working Cisco exploit:
http://www.elxsi.de/cisco-bug-44020.tar.gz
This is pasted from security focus:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/329765/2003-07-19/2003-07-25/0
To:
BugTraq
Subject:
Cisco IOS exploit (44020)
Date:
Jul 21 2003 4:01PM
Author:
Martin Kluge
10 matches
Mail list logo
