--On Monday, November 22, 2004 02:52:57 PM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just remember - if there *was* a conspiracy, this is exactly what the
people who were covering it up would say...
Hand me that tinfoil, will ya? :)
I don't believe in conspiracies. They require large numbers of people to
a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:16:44 CST, Paul Schmehl said:
> Just because someone or some institution has a credible name does not mean
> that you accept what they say without even bothering to think about it.
> Their "study" just invigorates the conspiracy theorist element of society
> without contr
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 1:15 PM -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, do you really feel that as long as the (potentially) fraudulent
votes did not change the outcome (as far as we know...knowing absolutely
nothing for certain at this point) it's perfectly ok that a method for
fixing the e-vo
Paul Schmehl wrote on 11/19/2004 11:07:47 AM:
> --On Friday, November 19, 2004 12:12:10 AM + Jason Coombs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,1
> > 0801,97614,00.html?nas=PM-97614
> >
> I wouldn't trust anything coming out
