Didn't work though, did it.
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> Hence the reason the founders of the US, Englishmen all until the
> Declaration of Independence, felt the need to explicitly declare the
> rights of man, and limit those of government.
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Drsolly wrote:
> Didn't work though, did it.
Cha-ching!
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
>
>> Hence the reason the founders of the US, Englishmen all until the
>> Declaration of Independence, felt the need to explicitly declare the
>> rights of man, and limit t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI.
- - ferg
- -- Forwarded message --
From: InfoSec News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:15 AM
Subject: [ISN] The Planet Warns of Security Breach
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/101708_T
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:54:36 +0900, Peter Evans said:
> Not quite up to "Brazil" yet.
Check back in another 25
pgp2m16I2GRsU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailm
Robert E. Lee of Outpost24 has posted a new entry describing the recent state
of TCP/IP issue,
i.e. discussion around the TCP/IP protocol stack Denial Of Service
vulnerability.
There is a FAQ type section included too.
Link:
http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/more-detailed-response-to-gordons-po
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:54:36 +0900, Peter Evans said:
>
>
>> Not quite up to "Brazil" yet.
>>
>
> Check back in another 25
>
Don't worry, phone IMEI can be changed.
--
Martin Tomasek
___
Fun and Misc
We haven't exercised all the options yet.
BB
Drsolly wrote:
> Didn't work though, did it.
>
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
>
>> Hence the reason the founders of the US, Englishmen all until the
>> Declaration of Independence, felt the need to expli
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:52:29 -0700
> From: Blue Boar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] UK: Passports Will Be Needed to Buy Mobile
Phones
>
> We haven't exercised all the options yet.
This is true. However
"There are fo
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Gregory Hicks wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:52:29 -0700
> > From: Blue Boar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org
> > Subject: Re: [funsec] UK: Passports Will Be Needed to Buy Mobile
> Phones
> >
> > We haven't exercise
After more than 200 years, I think any options you haven't exercised so
far, probably won't get exercised.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Blue Boar wrote:
> We haven't exercised all the options yet.
>
> BB
>
> Drsolly wrote:
> > Didn't work though, did it.
> >
> > On Sun, 1
I guess our definition of "popgun" must differ substantially, I'd
hardly consider an AK-47 a "popgun".
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or in the USA, actually. They don't allow US subjects to own any
> substantial weaponry, only popguns.
_
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:25:21 +1100
> From: "quispiam lepidus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] UK: Passports Will Be Needed to Buy Mobile Phones
>
> I guess our definition of "popgun" must differ substantially, I'd
> hard
You would if your opponent had artillery, jet fighters, napalm and
fuel-air bombs.
US subjects are only allowed to own weapons that they could never use to
make a revolution. All you can do with your popguns is kill other
civilians.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, quispiam lepidus wrote:
> I guess our d
13 matches
Mail list logo
