On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:53 AM, RandallM wrote:
> Hi
> Well this is interesting. Read the news on "Anonymous" attacking Bank
> of Americal yesterday morning.
> (https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/10542-Bank-of-America-Hit-By-Anonymous-DDoS-Attack.html)
>
> Came to work, a small production mark
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
: On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:34:08 EST, Rich Kulawiec said:
:
: > Slightly more seriously: there is no substantive difference between any
: > of these other than their tactics.
:
: I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then. Somehow, I think wh
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:54:24 EST, der Mouse said:
> > And I think that a plausible argument can be made that what Facebook
> > et.al. are doing is worse -- in the long run, not in the
> > obvious/immediate sense.
>
> I think I agree.
>
> It accustoms people to think that spamming is OK, when you'
> And I think that a plausible argument can be made that what Facebook
> et.al. are doing is worse -- in the long run, not in the
> obvious/immediate sense.
I think I agree.
It accustoms people to think that spamming is OK, when you're...I don't
know, popular? rich? big? enough.
/~\ The ASCII
From: Joel Esler
Date sent: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:47:07 -0500
> Jealous?
True ...
== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rsl...@vcn.bc.ca sl...@victoria.tc.ca rsl...@computercrime.org
Ignorance is never out of style. It was in f
Hi
Well this is interesting. Read the news on "Anonymous" attacking Bank
of Americal yesterday morning.
(https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/10542-Bank-of-America-Hit-By-Anonymous-DDoS-Attack.html)
Came to work, a small production marketing plant, and while doing
morning network work checks beg
Jealous?
On Dec 25, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
> X-Mailer: ZuckMail [version 1.00]
>
> Isn't that taking ego a bit too far?
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/m
Thanks, and next time please post the blog entry before sending out the
e-mail
-Original Message-
From: Reed Loden [mailto:r...@reedloden.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:07 AM
To: Larry Seltzer
Cc: FunSec
Subject: Re: [funsec] Important notice about your addons.mozilla.org
account
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:15:23AM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:34:08 EST, Rich Kulawiec said:
>
> > Slightly more seriously: there is no substantive difference between any
> > of these other than their tactics.
>
> I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then.
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:34:08 EST, Rich Kulawiec said:
> Slightly more seriously: there is no substantive difference between any
> of these other than their tactics.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then. Somehow, I think when you
conflate Facebook's sending overenthusiastic invite reminde
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:23:32PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> OK Rich, I'll bite. Now that you've blown "spammer filth" for Zuckerberg,
> what
> pejorative term are you going to use for the botnet herders, the fake
> penis-enlarging pill sellers, the whole 419 scene, the dirty-as-sin
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:46:09 -0500
Larry Seltzer wrote:
> Does this look right to you? The only links in it are e-mail addresses on
> Mozilla.org, but there's nothing about this on the add-ons site or their
> discussion forum.
It's legit.
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/12/27/addons-mozill
12 matches
Mail list logo
