[funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread RandallM
tip of a giant iceberg . http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118432 colder? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118346 -- been great, thanks a.k.a System ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:56:16 CST, RandallM said: > tip of a giant iceberg . > http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118432 Every conspiracy theorist says "it would be giant if we could only get all the evidence". > colder? > http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118346 OK. Before you go even a *single* step down tha

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread Larry Seltzer
esday, December 09, 2009 11:56 AM To: funsec Subject: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate tip of a giant iceberg . http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118432 colder? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118346 -- been great, thanks a.k.a System ___ Fu

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread Robert Graham
As a climate skeptic, these sorts of e-mails really pain me. WND is a right-wing fringe site, anything from that site hurts the skeptics argument, not helps it. There is no "signal" at that site. > http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118432 The leaked e-mails prove there is no conspiracy or hoax. The p

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread RandallM
; > *From:* funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] *On > Behalf Of *RandallM > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:56 AM > *To:* funsec > *Subject:* [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate > > > > tip of a giant iceberg . > http://

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread Larry Seltzer
WND was at the heart of all the birther trash. It's safe for everyone to suspect their motives and dismiss anything they put out. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_selt...@ziffdavis.com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ ___

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread RandallM
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Larry Seltzer wrote: > WND was at the heart of all the birther trash. It’s safe for everyone to > suspect their motives and dismiss anything they put out. > > > > Larry Seltzer > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > > larry_selt...@ziffdavis.com > > http://blogs.pcma

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread chris
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, RandallM wrote: > tip of a giant iceberg . http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=118432 You can't seriously quote Weird Net Daily. The National Enquirer has more solid sourcing. I can't see why this topic is such a politically-polarized one. Either mankind is capable of effecting

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, wrote: > > My friends who are solidly on the Right are determined that we are either > incapable of impacting climate, that these is no such thing or that it's > all a Communist Plot. They vomit data (even WND "data"

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread der Mouse
(In passing, it would help if you would avoid paragraph-length lines.) > My friends who are solidly on the Left are [...] > My friends who are solidly on the Right are [...] > I don't understand the eagerness of either side to find proof that > the world is either ending any minute or that we sho

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-09 Thread chris
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, RandallM wrote: > surely this is an unbiased place: > http://www.doomdaily.com/2009/nick-griffin-confronts-climategate-a-must-watch/ > :-) unassailable... 8~S As soon as someone says "Beleive nothing until it is denied!" I know I'm among the level headed. Now, for a littl

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-10 Thread chris
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, der Mouse wrote: > (In passing, it would help if you > would avoid paragraph-length lines.) Any sentence that you can't choke an elephant with isn't long enough. > it does occur to me as plausible, at least, that what you describe > is an aspect of the noisy extremists bei

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-10 Thread der Mouse
>> (In passing, it would help if you would avoid paragraph-length >> lines.) > Any sentence that you can't choke an elephant with isn't long enough. It's not long _sentences_ I mind. It's long _lines_. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-10 Thread Wes Deviers
On Thursday 10 December 2009 07:49:59 am ch...@blask.org wrote: > So, in large part you are correct: pure-partisan political roots don't elect major politicians, the rational center does. But the roots do elect the candidates and set the tone of the debate, and I remain at least cranky about -

Re: [funsec] maybe it's not over- climategate

2009-12-10 Thread Michael Collins
Mother Earth is a heartless bitch, as any photograph of a cat penis will inform you. What's more relevant is that our existence is a brief fragile flash of coincidence in an infinite universe of hostility, and pretending that our stability is the natural state of affairs rather than a hard-