Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-12-14 Par sujet Gonéri Le Bouder
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:17:57AM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > > > On 27.11.2010 20:47, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > Yes that is ok for me. Cheers For you information, I'm still working on this. Sorry for the delay, I had a lot of chang

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-27 Par sujet Mario Gzuk
On 27.11.2010 20:47, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: >>> To complet my suggestion, we need to had checksum in this FILES section. >>> I understand Uranos do that already but if we want to have something generic >>> enough we need to be able to

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-27 Par sujet Gonéri Le Bouder
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > > To complet my suggestion, we need to had checksum in this FILES section. > > I understand Uranos do that already but if we want to have something generic > > enough we need to be able to retrieve file ourself. > > > > Regarding this,

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-11 Par sujet Mario Gzuk
> To complet my suggestion, we need to had checksum in this FILES section. > I understand Uranos do that already but if we want to have something generic > enough we need to be able to retrieve file ourself. > > Regarding this, we already do peer to peer software download for the > OcsDeploy.pm mo

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-11 Par sujet Gonéri Le Bouder
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:16:44PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > >> It should do something like this: > >> > >> > > I think the header should be more like that if we follow the INVENTORY XML > > format example: > > > > > > RUNCOMMAND > >>INSTALLATION | UPDATE | USERINSTALL > > Can't this b

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-11 Par sujet Mario Gzuk
>> It should do something like this: >> >> > I think the header should be more like that if we follow the INVENTORY XML > format example: > > > RUNCOMMAND >> INSTALLATION | UPDATE | USERINSTALL > Can't this be passed in the OPTS line too? Sure... See later > >> wemerge.cmd | we

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui (and others)

2010-11-11 Par sujet Gonéri Le Bouder
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 07:59:48AM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > Hi, Hi Mario, For the others, please take the time to read this, because it may be used for any kind of remote command execution. > Am 03.11.2010 21:40, schrieb Gonéri Le Bouder: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:49:24PM +0100, Mario Gzuk

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui

2010-11-04 Par sujet Mario Gzuk
Hi, Am 03.11.2010 21:40, schrieb Gonéri Le Bouder: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:49:24PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: > Hi Mario, > What should the agent do once it has got the parameter for unattended-gui? > Store them somewhere or launch something? It should do something like this: INSTAL

Re: [Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui

2010-11-03 Par sujet Gonéri Le Bouder
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:49:24PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote: Hi Mario, Yes, this is something the server can do. In the team, we are also interested by a wpkg integration. The expected parameter for it are very similar. Maybe we can define an agnostic XML format for both system. Fabrice, can list h

[Fusioninventory-devel] Deployment in unattended-gui

2010-11-03 Par sujet Mario Gzuk
Hi, I currently dont know the state of the deployment part in fusioninventory, so I have written down some tasks how the installation process works in unattended-gui and how the current agent does his work. There is mainly only one script to call: wemereg.cmd for MS Windows based systems and wemerg