Re: rights/responsibilities(Tor)

Dear Tor, Thank you for commenting. Any snow yet in your area? A light frost here a few days ago. I'll try to better explain my position. > It is certainly not right to construct a conflict between social justice > and ecological concerns! I don't think it is a construction; rather it is real

Re: rights/responsibilities

Steve Kurtz wrote: > > Dear Thomas, > > > Your axe is social justice; mine is long term habitat health and > minimization of scarcity induced conflicts. You accept the system at base, > and plea for redistribution of credits. My view is equal slices of an > insufficient renewable pie results i

URL Correction (Whoops) (fwd)

For anyone with an interest, other of the papers produced by myself and my C\CEN colleagues over the last several years can be reached from and clicking on either the "papers" button or the "new publications" tag. Any comments on the paper(s) are appreci

Global Learn Day II (fwd)

I have been asked to be a keynote speaker for this event. The text of the address I will be giving on Oct. 11 can be found at . The presentation itself will be available as Real Video on the day of the event. For anyone with an interest, other of the

Re: rights/responsibilities

Thomas Lunde wrote: > Thomas: I guess, I disagree with both your answers. No, everyone should > not have to work because work has not been adequately defined. In your opinion! > Required > human actions is not a definition, it is a generalization. I use work as > currently defined by econom

In Case Anyone Needed to Be Reminded

As the witticism goes: If you owe the bank $10,000 and you can't pay, you have a problem... If you owe the bank $10,000,000 and you can't pay, they have a problem... Globe and Mail, Saturday Sept. 26, 1998 FUND RESCUED TO PREVENT MARKET CHAOS -Brian Milner and Andrew Willis- "The 14 p

Re: rights/responsibilities

-Original Message- From: Steve Kurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: futurework <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: September 25, 1998 11:35 AM Subject: Re: rights/responsibilities >Dear Thomas, > >> Thomas: Come on guys having a piss requires "human actions". > >At some future date, if you live long en