Re: 2. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences

2000-01-17 Thread Keith Hudson
A few comments on Ed Weick's observations: At 11:11 17/01/00 -0500, you wrote: >Keith Hudson has written a provocative piece suggesting that the human >species will split on the basis of intelligence. It will, Keith theorizes, >do so on the basis of the extent to which it is able to intellectual

FW guaranteed income meeting

2000-01-17 Thread S. Lerner
>From: "Michael Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: HSC, SUNY Stony Brook >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], en16@columbia, >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: 2. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences

2000-01-17 Thread Ed Weick
Keith Hudson has written a provocative piece suggesting that the human species will split on the basis of intelligence. It will, Keith theorizes, do so on the basis of the extent to which it is able to intellectually cope with, and utilize, advanced technology based on the microchip. He suggests

Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences

2000-01-17 Thread Keith Hudson
Bill, Thanks for your comments. Let me add some more of my own and clarify a few things: At 16:12 16/01/00 -0500, you wrote: >Keith, while I agree with a lot of what you have written, I have added some notes of my own. > >--- >Bill Ward >Research Director >Arthritis Research Institute of America

What makes this world go around (Was Re: What's Been Powering the U.S. Economy?)

2000-01-17 Thread john courtneidge
>From: "Viviane Lerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: What's Been Powering the U.S. Economy? >> >>>From The Left Business Observer > >The current (Nov) issue of ER, the monthly newsletter of COMER reiterates >the comments below that the U.S. economy is being powered by increases in >the money sup

Subsidiarity and the Basic Income

2000-01-17 Thread WesBurt
To: A few friends, a few lurking innocents, many devious defenders of the status quo (DDotSQ), and assorted classic academics on several mail lists. Dear friends, Please accept my sincere apologies for wasting your time, and for putting your interest in my subject at risk, with my wholly unn