From: Caspar Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe that a much more satisfying life is possible by substituting
friends, community, conversation and caring for stuff. I largely
If we don't follow Caspar's advise, there may not be ANY life a hundred
years from now -- let alone "satisfying life".
Eva Durant wrote:
(1) Jay's predictions are probably pretty "right on", and it would
make good sense to act as if we were *sure* they were true, since, at
worst, such a strategy would maximize our chances for survival of the
human species and for minimizing suffering for those of us
tom abeles wrote:
[snip]
the "green utopia" doesn't seem to be worth the price to get their- it
is not a resort destination but a destination of last resort- we get
there if we conserve and we get there if we don't-
Is that true? Isn't the question *what "we"* gets there? Will
that "we"
At 9:30 AM -0500 11/27/98, Brad McCormick, Ed.D. wrote:
snip
... If our culture bestowed the highest honors
on people who solved problems of preventive medicine, minimizing
resources needed for production, etc., then that's what the
brightest minds would eagerly
work on, rather than searching
tom abeles wrote:
[snip]
What the "green" visions hold is not such a possibility but the idea
that if we all get behind the movement the human race and the planet can
survive- humans get to live another day. yes, the air will be clean and
the fields will be green and the waters blue. But
At 11:00 AM 11/26/98 -0600, Tom Abeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Chisholm presents a cogent and clear picture of the green movement.
What is more to the point is the reaction which he has seen from the
general public and from the parishes where the church leaders with whom
he met tried to
