Re: Re: more on simulation ...

1998-12-05 Thread Edward Weick
"Douglas P. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since my post containing some tentative requirements analysis the silence has been deafening, with even Jay Hanson being mute on the subject. For my part, I found your post excellent, even inspiring. I marvel at your level of enthusiasm. -Pete

Re: more on simulation ...

1998-12-05 Thread Mark Measday
Mr Wilson's attempt to carry this mammoth undertaking out should be applauded. Hmm, how do you know you simulated and they didn't? If the output was the same Why would successfully simulating understanding the economy be any different from understanding? I don't understand why the sun goes

Re: more on simulation ...

1998-12-05 Thread Durant
I admit I did not follow this thread thoroughly, but I have a question: How do you collect your initial data, is it all based on the present ownership mode? Can your scheme simulate a system based on a different economic base, such as common ownership? How can you simulate the scale of democracy

FW: Re: more on simulation ...

1998-12-04 Thread pete
"Douglas P. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since my post containing some tentative requirements analysis the silence has been deafening, with even Jay Hanson being mute on the subject. For my part, I found your post excellent, even inspiring. I marvel at your level of enthusiasm. However I

more on simulation, and replies to some comments

1998-12-03 Thread Douglas P. Wilson
This is a reply to several more messages about my project to do a simulation of the world economy, but before I get on with replying, I'd like to clear up some possible misunderstandings. Since my post containing some tentative requirements analysis the silence has been deafening, with even