Thomas Adam schrieb:
Hi Chtistian,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_force_refresh_focus and
refresh_focus) which seem to steal the focus from the focus p
--
My 2c, as a relatively new list member.
I too think highly of Thomas; he's generally quite helpful on the list, and
capable of being a very nice and warm fellow. He seems to be extraordinarily
dedicated to the project.
But in my interactions with him on the list and off, he has also occasiona
Harry portobello wrote:
[snip]
Harry:
when I read your first posting, I thought you were kidding around; I
admit I didn't read it to the end.
But now I am baffled: you seem to want to create a problem that does not
exist.
The replies you got on this list indicate that there is no issue with
Th
Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 07:29, Harry portobello :
>
> I'm still convinced that there's room for improvement here and until
> then am keen for Thomas to respond - [...]
>
> No this is not a witch-hunt, but Thomas, silence is a bad thing in
> times like these.
What exactly is this? Do you realize how co
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, B. [simoN] Karhan wrote:
as a longtime lurker and very rare poster to the list...
i'm most unhappy when this sort of non-sense populates
the list...
Thomas is dedicated, technically excellent and enormously fair... given
the inane nature of these sideline (really gutter)
Hi everyone.
I want to add my support to Thomas.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Harry portobello
wrote:
>
> Hullo,
>
> On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk wrote:
> > Hi Harry,
> >
> > as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for
> > Thomas
> > and will told you,
B. [simoN] Karhan wrote:
finally, i do know Thomas personally... my opinion is based
fully upon his dedicated assistance towards developing FVWM
and supporting it on this list.
i meant to say: "i do NOT know Thomas personally"...
B.
as a longtime lurker and very rare poster to the list...
i'm most unhappy when this sort of non-sense populates
the list...
Thomas is dedicated, technically excellent and enormously fair... given
the inane nature of these sideline (really gutter) discussions...
speaking quite honestly, i f
Hullo,
On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for
> Thomas
> and will told you, that this posting hasn't belong on a public board. But
> anyway,
> you've done it, so I add one's two cents ...
>
> Yes, Thom
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:53:03PM +, vik wrote:
> Any help would be much appreciated - here are the details -
>
> vncserver version -
> vnc/E4.4.2/vncserver
>
> fvwm2 version -
> fvwm2/2.5.17/bin/fvwm2
That's an old version of FVWM. Do you have reason to use this? Please try
with F
Hi Chtistian,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
> some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_force_refresh_focus and
> refresh_focus) which seem to steal the focus from the focus proxy
> and therefo
Any help would be much appreciated - here are the details -
vncserver version -
vnc/E4.4.2/vncserver
fvwm2 version -
fvwm2/2.5.17/bin/fvwm2
OS version -
Linux 2.6.16.60-0.58.1.1882.3.PTF.638363-smp (gcc 4.1.2 20070115)
em64t architecture
fvwm2 comes up fine, but the buttonbar at the bottom
I haven't been someone who tried to "contribute to fvwm". I'm just a user.
I have to say I haven't had any problems with Thomas Adam or anyone else at
fvwm who helped me.
I had one issue (trying to find out if I could do something with fvwm) about a
year ago and I pestered Thomas and others (ma
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Harry portobello
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
*snip*
>
>
Some people prefer not to waste time with added fluff while
communicating, hackers are quite known for this (see also RMS, Linus,
Theo, etc.).
These people are often very busy and will not waste time with
superfluous
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Funk [mailto:t.f...@web.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:07 AM
> To: Harry portobello; fvwm@fvwm.org
> Subject: Re: FVWM: FAO: Thomas Adam - list attitudes and unveiling the
> person behind email
>
> Hi Harry,
>
> as I red your email, my first
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Harry portobello
wrote:
> A few people have privately said to me lately that although they think
> fvwm is a great program, they're not happy with the attitudes of the
> most active maintainer, Thomas Adam.
This surprises me. Primarily because I believe Thomas t
Hi Harry,
as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for Thomas
and will told you, that this posting hasn't belong on a public board. But
anyway,
you've done it, so I add one's two cents ...
Yes, Thomas is sometimes abrasive, shortspoken and, if the other doesn't rtfm
a
17 matches
Mail list logo
