Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:51:45 +1000 Stuart Longland wrote: > > On 4/2/24 08:05, Thomas Adam wrote: > I think this is where we need to consider what the FVWM/Wayland re-write > would look like. What can be practically brought across under the > constraints of the `wlroots` back-end (or Wayland

Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-03 Thread Stuart Longland
On 4/2/24 08:05, Thomas Adam wrote: Wayland is not Xlib. I have been, in my spare time, looking at the XServer code and all the other libraries surrounding it, and looking at open MRs on Xorg's Gitlab instance -- which means I am going to help keep XServer alive -- which by extension means

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-03 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:42:37PM -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote: > Now, I don't know if you could use the really old-style remote display > stuff where ssh is not involved. Xwayland really is a proper X server > so the ability to do it is probably down in there somewhere. Yes-and-no -- in that,

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-03 Thread Mandar Mitra
Lucio Chiappetti wrote (Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 01:53:29PM +0100): > I hope to be able to go on with Xorg until I live. Amen! :-)

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-03 Thread Lucio Chiappetti
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Robert Heller wrote: Afterall, no one needs more then one computer... I suppose there is a smiley missing after the sentence :-) My usual way of working (post-COVID, from home) involves usually one or two ssh sessions on two different remote work machines. Quite