Hi everyone,
I've been using fvwm3 for a few months, and have realised that its
config file is the same as fvwm2.
On the fvwm2's github repo README, I note that it has been put in
maintenance mode and that use of fvwm3 is preferred.
I'm OK with that, but can anyone here tell me what the plan is
Hi Dominik,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:51 PM Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Can you please be more precise? You're mixing the terms page,
> desk and screen which are all differet things. Could you give an
> example of the workflow? It's hard for me to imagine what you're
> actually doig that could requir
hi Dominik,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:45 AM Dominik Vogt wrote:
> What is the actual use case for this?
i quite often find myself wanting to move windows between desks to
suit my workflow. what i would like is the ability to move windows as
they are on desk X to screen Y without them losing whic
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how I can move all windows from desk X to
desk Y without losing where the windows on desk X are in terms of
their pages.
I know I can do something like:
All (Desk 1) MoveToDesk 2
But all this does is take every window on desk 1 (regardless of page)
and move those wi
Hi everyone,
Can i please get some advise about how to make fvwm work well with
multiple monitors? i'm after the following:
- separate workspaces per monitor - this would allow monitor
independence from each other, which is important to me with lots of
graphics design
-
fvwmpager - i have a very
;
> FVWM2 and FVWM3 both support multiple displays. As far as supporting RandR, I
> think that is the X server's job.
>
> I use the command "xrandr" to manipulate display configurations.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ron
>
>
&
Hi,
Does fvwm have XRandR support yet?
What I'm hoping for is:
1. Independent monitors (desks per monitor)
2. rotation & reflection
Is this possible in fvwm yet? many other WM's out there offer RandR support.
Ta!
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Jaimos Skriletz
wrote:
> Hello,
Howdy.
> I have put together a default configuration to go with Fvwm. The
> configuration could use some testing. To test this config, use the
> default-config branch on github.
>
> The default config will load if fvwm doesn't fi
Hi,
I was just browsing the fvwm git repository and saw that things have
been busy this weekend - I hope this means fvwm development is
happening again? It has been really slow for years - nothing
happening.
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/blob/ta/next/FVWM3.md
Does this mean fvwm2 is dead? Does
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Dan Espen wrote:
> Sounds to me like you are not subscribed to fvwm-workers.
> If you care about things like the repository, you should subscribe.
ok - I will do this. How busy is the list?
> Read the various TODO files.
The only one I can see is this one -
htt
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Dan Espen wrote:
> Yes, a number of people wanted git.
> No point in arguing against that.
> It's accepted that git out does CVS in functionality.
But I can't recall when on the fvwm lists the pros and cons of moving.
I know that github is considered the place to
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Lucio Chiappetti
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:42:14PM +0200, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
>>>
>>> is <<< a perlism, or a typo for more customary << ?
>>
>>
>> In shell, <<< is a here-string.
>
>
> I wasn't aware of the
Hi,
I have been using fvwm for a while and I think that this idea of
changing the config format is ill thought out and silly. Why does this
need changing now after all these years? I can't see how you expect a
script to convert to this new format easily - its a very lofty goal.
Don't do this at a
13 matches
Mail list logo
