Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:56:57PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:40:36PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>> >> P.S.
>> >> I still know that the problem can only be fixed if someone
>> >> else than me can reproduce my observation
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:56:57PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
> Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:40:36PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
> >> P.S.
> >> I still know that the problem can only be fixed if someone
> >> else than me can reproduce my observations. And I know that
> >> yo
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:40:36PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>> P.S.
>> I still know that the problem can only be fixed if someone
>> else than me can reproduce my observations. And I know that
>> you already tried this.
>
> I can reproduce it -- and it's entirely some oddi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:40:36PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
> P.S.
> I still know that the problem can only be fixed if someone
> else than me can reproduce my observations. And I know that
> you already tried this.
I can reproduce it -- and it's entirely some oddity in your config.
-- Thomas
Michael Großer wrote:
> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> 2011/12/28 Michael Großer :
>>> When I increased the total number of viewports from 144 to 432 some
>>> weeks ago, I redesigned my approach to manage the pagers (using some
>>> of these advices above). Today, 16 months later, my FVWM config should
>>> b
Thomas Adam wrote:
> 2011/12/28 Michael Großer :
>> When I increased the total number of viewports from 144 to 432 some
>> weeks ago, I redesigned my approach to manage the pagers (using some
>> of these advices above). Today, 16 months later, my FVWM config should
>> be a lot more mature and a bit
2011/12/28 Michael Großer :
> When I increased the total number of viewports from 144 to 432 some
> weeks ago, I redesigned my approach to manage the pagers (using some
> of these advices above). Today, 16 months later, my FVWM config should
> be a lot more mature and a bit less dirty compared to t
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Michael Großer wrote:
>> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:51:44AM +0200, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:21:53PM +0200, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote:
>> >> > > Hi!
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
