On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:11:57PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
I think TA mentioned it was slow. I don't know if he measured it
or not.
Yeah: http://xteddy.org/~n6tadam/fvwm/nytprof/
Note interpret_menu() is the culprit -- the scan_AppDir() and
read_desktop_entry() subroutines don't help, but I
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:11:57PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
I think TA mentioned it was slow. I don't know if he measured it
or not.
Yeah: http://xteddy.org/~n6tadam/fvwm/nytprof/
Nice!
Note interpret_menu() is the culprit -- the scan_AppDir() and
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:57:37PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:11:57PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
I think TA mentioned it was slow. I don't know if he measured it
or not.
Yeah:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:14:54PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
After removing the ones we don't need (above), there's not many calls left.
We only deal with a few directories. We could readdir and build a hash.
Yes, but the recusiveness of those subroutines before the hashing I added in
the patch
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
Timings with the patch attached applied are here:
http://xteddy.org/~n6tadam/fvwm/nytprof-updated/
That's what I call impressive improvments!
I applied the patch, works well for me.
--
Dan Espen
