My email service got got messed up yesterday so I am sending this message again.
The fvwm mail archive appears to be way behind, so I can't tell it it
went though.
I've switched my subscription to a gmail account.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:44:27AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Mar
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and unmaintained
Please send me the location of any feature requests or bug reports.
Here's my list.
1. don't reorder others in group on
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:24:57PM -0700, jpwe...@imonk.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and unmaintained
Please send me the location of any feature
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:44:27AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:24:57PM -0700, jpwe...@imonk.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
[Start of friendly mode.]
5) To make Thomas focus more on constructive things and less on
destructive. :-) Really, I didn't see an fvwm developer who wanted to
remove or break so many things in fvwm in so short period. :-) It
Hello,
I've been talking to the Debian FVWM maintainer who wishes to get more
involved with us upstream (which is good!). He's wanting us to remove
the debian/ directory from FVWM. His reasons for doing so are
perfectly understandable. And before certain alarmists cry out in
shock, here's the
[Start of friendly mode.]
Reasons to remove debian/ from fvwm as I see it:
1) To make a work for one man easier.
BTW, I think Manoj used GNU Arch in the past and it perfectly supports
real merges and file/dir renames as well as the files with the same
names, but different ids in the branches. I
