Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-25 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:39:14AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 13:25 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > ... > > > Can you please try out the branch "dv/fix-cr-merging" tha I've > > > just pushed and

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-24 Thread zlists
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 21:59 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:39:14AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 13:25 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > ... >>> Can you please try out the branch "dv/fix-cr-merging" tha I've >>> just pushed and see if

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-24 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:39:14AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 13:25 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: ... > > Can you please try out the branch "dv/fix-cr-merging" tha I've > > just pushed and see if the fix works for you? (For me, it does.) > > And it does for me.

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Viktor Griph
2016-10-23 17:05 GMT+02:00 Dominik Vogt : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: >> Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : >> > void fev_sanitise_configure_request(XConfigureRequestEvent *cr) >> > { >> >

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:10:25PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:05:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I never can remember this; is it safe (in C) to assume that > > negative integers are stored in two-complement format? (Of course > > the old code makes the same

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:05:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > I never can remember this; is it safe (in C) to assume that > negative integers are stored in two-complement format? (Of course > the old code makes the same assumtion, but it's broken and I want > to fix it.) It is not safe to make

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : > > void fev_sanitise_configure_request(XConfigureRequestEvent *cr) > > { > > if (cr->value_mask & CWX) > > { > >

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Viktor Griph
Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > >> On

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 13:25 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2016

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > >> I cloned

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > >> I cloned the git version about 15 minutes ago and compiled it, and > >> acroread

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:44 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > As a little bit of explanation how to read this output: Thanks for the tutorial! >> cre: 935(1) 0(2) 985(0)x1080(0) fw 0x00401005 w 0x06200031 ew 0x06200031 >> 'Adobe Reader' >^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^ > X

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:51:52AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I'm now trying to identify the commit with which this strange > > placement started. Do you know of any other commit ids or dates > > between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6 that were

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > I'm now trying to identify the commit with which this strange > placement started. Do you know of any other commit ids or dates > between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6 that were definitely fine or broken? Whoever ends up doing this, should use

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:23 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:00:16PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:21 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2016

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread Dominik Vogt
As a little bit of explanation how to read this output: On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:00:16PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > cre: 935(1) 0(2) 985(0)x1080(0) fw 0x00401005 w 0x06200031 ew 0x06200031 > 'Adobe Reader' ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^ X Y Width

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:00:16PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:21 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > >>> On Sat, Oct

[zli...@ns.sympatico.ca: Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?]

2016-10-22 Thread Dominik Vogt
- Forwarded message from zli...@ns.sympatico.ca - Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:00:16 -0300 From: zli...@ns.sympatico.ca To: Dominik Vogt <dominik.v...@gmx.de> Subject: Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ? User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:21 (+0100), D

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > >> I cloned the git version about 15 minutes ago and compiled it, and > >> acroread

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> I cloned the git version about 15 minutes ago and compiled it, and >> acroread still does not go full-screen correctly. > Can you reproduce this using a more

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > I cloned the git version about 15 minutes ago and compiled it, and > acroread still does not go full-screen correctly. Can you reproduce this using a more accessible program, please? I'm using FreeBSD. -- Thomas Adam

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread zlists
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 15:08 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 08:38:10AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: On Sat, Jul 16, 2016

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 15:08 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 08:38:10AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 23:27 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > >>> On Sat, Jul 16,

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-22 Thread zlists
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 15:08 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 08:38:10AM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 23:27 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 07:10:24PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: I recently upgraded a

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-07-16 Thread zlists
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 23:27 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 07:10:24PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> I recently upgraded a computer from Slackware64 14.1 to 14.2, which >> bumped by fvwm version from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6. >> With the new system, when I ask Adobe

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-07-16 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 07:10:24PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > I recently upgraded a computer from Slackware64 14.1 to 14.2, which > bumped by fvwm version from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6. > > With the new system, when I ask Adobe reader 9.5.5 to go full-screen, > I get a window with no

regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-07-16 Thread zlists
I recently upgraded a computer from Slackware64 14.1 to 14.2, which bumped by fvwm version from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6. With the new system, when I ask Adobe reader 9.5.5 to go full-screen, I get a window with no decorations, but it only occupies about 3/4 of the screen, off to the lower right. I