Hi Dominik...
There has been a lot of discussion about whether the ideas expressed in
the "ethical license" are really ethical or not (is it ethical to kill a
person? Is it ethical to not kill a person who is directly threatening
yourself or your children? Etc.)
This kind of thing is, unfortuna
Well, it got too much into politics to continue it.
The Dominik's reply makes some incorrect assumtions like I am from US and
do not know facts. I am from one of the several countries that commanded
all citizens to carry gaz masks with themselves (because Iraq may still
respond although most of th
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:30:25PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> I really don't like to answer this message, because I don't see a point.
> We speak now which ethics is better, but this is irrelevant, the
> developers (at least the ones who answered) expressed a wish not to mix
> ethics with sof
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:20:24AM -0500, larry gensch wrote:
> Dominick recently wrote:
>
> > Wrapping up the answers to several posts:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:26:45AM +0100, Uwe Pross wrote:
> > > Good morning Fvwm Workers,
> > >
> > > How about making a statement on the fvwm web sit
I really don't like to answer this message, because I don't see a point.
We speak now which ethics is better, but this is irrelevant, the
developers (at least the ones who answered) expressed a wish not to mix
ethics with software.
Anyway, it seems Dominik wants to talk about ethics, so I will sho
Dominick recently wrote:
> Wrapping up the answers to several posts:
>
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:26:45AM +0100, Uwe Pross wrote:
> > Good morning Fvwm Workers,
> >
> > How about making a statement on the fvwm web site instead
> > of a new license?
>
> Strictly speaking, it is no more than a