Try running a cpstop and a cpstart on the SmartCenter. If the certificate is
expired, that should renew it. You'll get a note about a new fingerprint if
this is what's going on.
Ray
From: r locus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
To: FW-1
I am running Windows 2003 spk1 and R61 hfa01.
I can not log in to my SmartDashboard. After entering my username and
password an error window will appear saying:
"The connection has been refused due to one of the following
SmartCenter certificate problems:
1. The SmartCenter Server's Clock is not
If you have a stand-alone Windows and want something more "proprietary", you
can just migrate from Windows to Secure Platform, which comes included with
Well, I wouldn't migrate on my current hardware. Let's just say that my
existing hardware is very dated. So no matter what, I need to invest
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Rick Osterberg wrote:
best option is to go with UTM-1 appliance. It has no user limit. All you
need extra is to move the license for secureclient (if you use secure
client and not securemote for remote access)
But the UTM Edge appliance can also be configured for no user
If you have a stand-alone Windows and want something more "proprietary", you
can just migrate from Windows to Secure Platform, which comes included with
every Check Point license at no extra charge and even when it is installed
over an open hardware platform, makes your open server an "appliance"
b
hello,
edge is a small office product with very limited hardware ressources and is not
full fw1 featured. Good for up to about 2Mbit and 10 users.
utm1 appliance is full fw1 featured and much faster than the edge. More
smartdefense, more interfaces, more authentication and bandwidth-mgmt or
a
Rick Osterberg wrote:
best option is to go with UTM-1 appliance. It has no user limit. All
you need extra is to move the license for secureclient (if you use
secure client and not securemote for remote access)
But the UTM Edge appliance can also be configured for no user limit,
correct?
My
best option is to go with UTM-1 appliance. It has no user limit. All you need
extra is to move the license for secureclient (if you use secure client and
not securemote for remote access)
But the UTM Edge appliance can also be configured for no user limit,
correct?
My great hesitation is tha
Rick Osterberg wrote:
Is there anywhere that has a good comparison between the UTM-1, UTM Edge
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] product lines? There are plenty of comparisons among
different models in each line, but I can't find anything that compares
the entire lines to each other.
I've currently got
Hi,
We have a NGXR62 with Secureclient license for 250 users ...and now due to
facts that licensing is complicated to the point ? is there a way to list
all the users that are occupying VSC license at any given point of time...i
know dtps lic gives me a count ...but the actual usernames going tow
10 matches
Mail list logo
