R65.1 is for new IPS-1 binaries, documentation etc. Everything else is the
same with R65 version of the iso's.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:FW-1-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:11 AM
> To: FW-1-MAILI
Hmmm, I just noticed that an Advanced Secure Knowledge search now shows three
R65 versions: R65, R65 with Messaging Security and R65.1
I don't have a clue as to what version R65.1 is.
sk34687 mentions and R65 HFA03. Support of VPN-1 Power/UTM NGX R65 HFA_01,
HFA_02 and HFA_03 on SecurePlatform
I was told that the plan is for an HFA or other update to be released later
this year that will upgrade all R65 installations of the 2.4 kernel to the R65
2.6 kernel.
Ray
> But at present it is not clear if this version will receive the same
> HFA's as the other versions. That is a much more re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Scott wrote:
| Just a heads up, the R65 with messaging security version behaves the
| same way with the HFA's.
Considering that before the release I have played with it a little and
it was known as HFA-03 at that time gives an indication what th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
cisco4ng wrote:
| Maybe so but from a company liability issue, it needs to be official from
| checkpoint. It's called Cover Your Ass (aka CYA) from management.
If you need such a statement then consult Check Point. No one here is
able to give an off
Maybe so but from a company liability issue, it needs to be official from
checkpoint. It's called Cover Your Ass (aka CYA) from management.
sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: cisco4ng wrote:
> "are there any restrictions like :
> could an ngx r65 smartcenter 2.4 manage a 2.6 gateway ?"
>
> I have a
Just a heads up, the R65 with messaging security version behaves the
same way with the HFA's.
-GS
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reinhard Stich
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 7:44 AM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.U
cisco4ng wrote:
"are there any restrictions like :
could an ngx r65 smartcenter 2.4 manage a 2.6 gateway ?"
I have a ticket opened with our Security Provider for this exact scenario. I
will
post the response when I receive an answer from the vendor
I have a feeling it's gonna work without i
"are there any restrictions like :
could an ngx r65 smartcenter 2.4 manage a 2.6 gateway ?"
I have a ticket opened with our Security Provider for this exact scenario. I
will
post the response when I receive an answer from the vendor
pkc_mls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,
For a new installa
hi,
I know some customers running splat 2.6, it works. a limitation is
that you can't install the "normal" HFAs on this version.
br
reinhard
At 12:38 23.04.2008, you wrote:
Hi all,
For a new installation, I can install secureplatform ngx r65 based
on 2.4 or 2.6 kernel.
As the 2.6 kernel
Hi all,
For a new installation, I can install secureplatform ngx r65 based on
2.4 or 2.6 kernel.
As the 2.6 kernel based version is quite new, has anyone some feedbacks
regarding the versions ?
I don't know how it could be possible to compare both versions, but anyway.
please don't turn th
Hi Giacomo,
This is the internal secure communication which is failing. In our setup,
we have two cluster nodes, we need to explicitly route in our smartcenter
the external cluster-node ip through the corresponding internal
cluster-node ip and not through the internal virtual cluster ip. With t
Hello,
i yesterday moved my firewall from R55 NG to R65 NGX.
I splitted my configuration from standalone to fw and Smart Center.
It work fine, but often i have the following error:
Installation Targets Version Policy Type Details
fw1ngx NGX R65 Advanced Security
Installation failed. Reason: TC
Hi Again,
I just would like to update this thread so that if somebody else runs into
the same problems this maybe could help.
As I said before, in the Ipso 4.2 Build 081 a01 Release Notes, on page
167, I found the following PR:
Multiple Interfaces Enhancement
NGX R60 includes a feature to pr
Ted Serreyn a écrit :
Where is this patch, I have not seen reference to it before?
you should find this version at checkpoint download site :
http://www.checkpoint.com/downloads/latest/hfa/smartconsole/index.html
--
Ted Serreyn Phone:262-432-0260 Fax:262-432-0232
Serreyn Network Services,
The error is the following:
Internal Error: SmartDefense Update configuration file could not be opened.
One or more arguments are invalid.
Giacomo
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Serreyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] R65 NGX
16 matches
Mail list logo
