Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-10 Thread Sebastian Arriada
ich is a P-III 700 Mhz, and 10 M/bps of bandwidth and everything worked well. Ray > Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:14:01 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks > To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM > > at my previous

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread Ray
ing worked well. Ray > Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:14:01 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks > To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM > > at my previous job, we did a stress test on Nokia IP2260 (2GB ram box) > on

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread cisco4ng
at my previous job, we did a stress test on Nokia IP2260 (2GB ram box) on NGx R61 with HFA_01 by turning on all the smart defense and web intelligence features. We use spirent load tester and the result was: 1: With smartdefense and web intell. features DISABLE, we were able to push a

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread pkc_mls
No Name Available a écrit : Thanks Sin, What would be the effect of turning smart defence and webintelligence services on services on on the gateways in terms of proc and mem utilisation. that will activate the http proxy on the firewall (to examine the traffic deeper than a standard tcp/ip

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
No Name Available wrote: > Thanks Sin, > What would be the effect of turning smart defence and webintelligence > services on services on on the gateways in terms of proc and mem > utilisation. It highly depends on the exact amount and type of checks you enable. But it will cost you some CPU power

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread sin
No Name Available wrote: Thanks Sin, What would be the effect of turning smart defence and webintelligence services on services on on the gateways in terms of proc and mem utilisation. given the fact that turning that on will require taking a deep look at how the protocol is respected and if

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread No Name Available
Sent: 09 October 2007 10:15 To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM Subject: Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks No Name Available wrote: > I am currently using r61 on my gateways which protect our website. I > don't have smart defense or web intelligence services t

Re: [FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread sin
No Name Available wrote: I am currently using r61 on my gateways which protect our website. I don't have smart defense or web intelligence services turned on at the moment. Recently I have seen increasing amount of DDoS attacks against our site. I just wanted an advice on how effective it would

[FW-1] smart defence service and ddos attacks

2007-10-09 Thread No Name Available
I am currently using r61 on my gateways which protect our website. I don't have smart defense or web intelligence services turned on at the moment. Recently I have seen increasing amount of DDoS attacks against our site. I just wanted an advice on how effective it would be to turn smart defence an