Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the
destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer of
defence
. Januar 2003 17:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
Question 3:
In 4.1, our resource for inbound mail says that only accept mail addressed
to OURDOMAIN. Wouldn't DNS handle this issue, as you would never get a
HOTMAIL.COM email to your YAHOO.COM email server? Can
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
Hello,
of course you can configure your Check Point FireWall as MTA. DNS does not
handle this issues (SPAM), professional MTAs like MIMESweeper, sendmail or
qMail behind your firewall do. I.e. in sendmail you
in the process you
drop it, the less resources you will use.
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Fritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 31, 2003 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
Hello,
of course you can configure
Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 15:40
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the
destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer
Hi,
I have an SMTP question relating to 4.1 but further down I would like to see
how it would relate to NG FP3, as we will be moving to that shortly.
Objects:
MAILSERVER
192.168.100.1
STATIC NAT: 200.200.200.200
MAILSERVER-EXT
200.200.200.200
Rule for outbound mail:
Source
Christopher Collins wrote:
Hi,
I have an SMTP question relating to 4.1 but further down I would like to see
how it would relate to NG FP3, as we will be moving to that shortly.
Objects:
MAILSERVER
192.168.100.1
STATIC NAT: 200.200.200.200
MAILSERVER-EXT
200.200.200.200
Rule for