Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Ward
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3 We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer of defence

[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-31 Thread Joerg Fritsch
. Januar 2003 17:08 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3 Question 3: In 4.1, our resource for inbound mail says that only accept mail addressed to OURDOMAIN. Wouldn't DNS handle this issue, as you would never get a HOTMAIL.COM email to your YAHOO.COM email server? Can

Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-31 Thread Christopher Collins
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3 Hello, of course you can configure your Check Point FireWall as MTA. DNS does not handle this issues (SPAM), professional MTAs like MIMESweeper, sendmail or qMail behind your firewall do. I.e. in sendmail you

Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-31 Thread Crist Clark
in the process you drop it, the less resources you will use. -Original Message- From: Joerg Fritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 31, 2003 6:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3 Hello, of course you can configure

[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-31 Thread Joerg Fritsch
Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 15:40 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3 We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer

[FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-30 Thread Christopher Collins
Hi, I have an SMTP question relating to 4.1 but further down I would like to see how it would relate to NG FP3, as we will be moving to that shortly. Objects: MAILSERVER 192.168.100.1 STATIC NAT: 200.200.200.200 MAILSERVER-EXT 200.200.200.200 Rule for outbound mail: Source

Re: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3

2003-01-30 Thread Crist Clark
Christopher Collins wrote: Hi, I have an SMTP question relating to 4.1 but further down I would like to see how it would relate to NG FP3, as we will be moving to that shortly. Objects: MAILSERVER 192.168.100.1 STATIC NAT: 200.200.200.200 MAILSERVER-EXT 200.200.200.200 Rule for