Re: [fw-general] Form default decorators

2010-11-16 Thread Jurian Sluiman
On Monday 15 Nov 2010 22:30:04 Steve Rayner wrote: however i still get the dt and dd html tags. am i doing this wrong? is there a simple way to turn off this feature for all forms. I'm finding that these tags are making my css more complicated than it needs to be. The dt and dd are

[fw-general] How to add RewriteRule to ZF default .htaccess ?

2010-11-16 Thread Laurens van Vliet
Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to add some basic RewriteRules to the ZF .htaccess? Is it possible to match certain urls while there is not a corresponding Controller/Action/View or Routes configured for these paths? Something like: SetEnv APPLICATION_ENV development RewriteEngine On

[fw-general] Re: How to add RewriteRule to ZF default .htaccess ?

2010-11-16 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Laurens van Vliet at 16/11/10 11:11 did gyre and gimble: Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to add some basic RewriteRules to the ZF .htaccess? Is it possible to match certain urls while there is not a corresponding Controller/Action/View or Routes configured for

Re: [fw-general] Re: How to add RewriteRule to ZF default .htaccess ?

2010-11-16 Thread Laurens van Vliet
Problem with this code is that it is not working. When I try to open in my browser my application with /foo at the end of the url, say for example: http://www.example.com/foo then I get this error message: Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Controller_Dispatcher_Exception' with message

[fw-general] Re: How to add RewriteRule to ZF default .htaccess ?

2010-11-16 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Laurens van Vliet at 16/11/10 11:57 did gyre and gimble: Problem with this code is that it is not working. When I try to open in my browser my application with /foo at the end of the url, say for example: http://www.example.com/foo then I get this error message: Fatal

[fw-general] Announcing the November 2010 Zend Framework Bug-Hunt

2010-11-16 Thread Ralph Schindler
Reprinted from http://dz.zend.com/a/12785 For those who haven't put the reoccurring event in their calendar, this announcement is for you: Zend Framework Monthly Bug-hunt is here again! This *Thursday*, *Friday* and *Saturday* of November (the 18th, 19th and 20th 2010), we'll be hosting our

[fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread monk.e.boy
weierophinney wrote: (APC http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php will help your speed issues) APC is one solution -- and that applies to ZF1 as well. However, the better solution is to profile the code and re-architect pain points to make them more performant. The autoloading/plugin

[fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread David Muir
monk.e.boy wrote: weierophinney wrote: (APC http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php will help your speed issues) APC is one solution -- and that applies to ZF1 as well. However, the better solution is to profile the code and re-architect pain points to make them more performant. The

Re: [fw-general] Form default decorators

2010-11-16 Thread Mike Wright
Steve Rayner wrote: I'm trying to get rid of the default decorators in zend form. I don't want the dl, dt dd tags. snip/ is there a simple way to turn off this feature for all forms. I'm finding that these tags are making my css more complicated than it needs to be. Hi Steve, I also

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Nick Daugherty
I'm seeing a lot of talk about Doctrine 2 and ZF lately. Is the general consensus that Doctrine is going to be used for object persistence, rather than a new Zend component? Yes Doctrine is great, but it has some limitations, some of which are non-trivial in complex applications and the

[fw-general] List specific objects in Zend_Service_Amazon_S3

2010-11-16 Thread Ron Dyck
Is there any was to list specific objects in Zend_Service_Amazon_S3 For example I have objects in a tree like structure and I want to access on a particular tree. /mybucket/sites/foo /mybucket/sites/bar /mybucket/sites/baz Can I do a query and list just /mybucket/sites/baz ? Your help is

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Nick Daugherty
The biggest concern I have with Doctrine 2 is that it requires developers to explicitly define class members in their code. This is ok in many cases, but consider the case of a CMS that allows users to define their own fields through a GUI w/o coding. The way to accomplish this would be to store

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Jurian Sluiman
On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 22:45:42 Nick Daugherty wrote: Regardless, I think Zend is important enough to have it's own ORM. If it had a performant and above all, easy to use, ORM, it could be THE killer framework. Right now, Symfony is easily coupled with Doctrine (and Doctrine requires parts of

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Nick Daugherty
Hi Jurian, I'm not sure if Benjamin's reasons for stopping were 'very good'...to me it sounds like it came down to him not having enough time to flesh everything out and get it as functional as Doctrine, rather than real reasons for excluding it from Zend. If we find additional interest in the

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Benjamin Eberlei
Hey Nick, Doctrine does not rely on getters and setters for hydration. It only uses reflection to set and get the values. That is why we cannot implement your requested support for dynamic fields. However the functionality you want from Doctrine 2 exists in 2.0 already and is planned to

Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF 2.0 when and what?

2010-11-16 Thread Nick Daugherty
Hi Benjamin, Thanks for the insight into your work on Zend_Entity. The reason I believed that Doctrine used getters and setters for hydration was that the documentation encouraged making the members private (so I assumed that Doctrine would not be able to properly set the values without