Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-24 Thread Willie Alberty
On Sep 24, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: Just to be clear, I didn't mean that it'd be interesting to support the Java APIs for building Portlets... Noted. I am building a portal-like application for myself and am in need of a full-featured API for PHP-based portlets. I really don't

RE: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
age- > From: Willie Alberty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 12:12 PM > To: Zend Framework General > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet? > > On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:34 PM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > > Could you explain a

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-24 Thread Willie Alberty
On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:34 PM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: Could you explain a bit more what it is, I didn't read the spec and I found the site vague. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Portlet_specification -- Willie Alberty, Owner Spenlen Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spenlen.com/

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-24 Thread Willie Alberty
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Georg von der Howen wrote: Zend_Portlet would then consist of a portlet container and a portlet class, that is extended by 'real' portlets, right? I'm envisioning more of a direct port of the API only. That is to say, Zend_Portlet would define a common set of in

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-24 Thread Philippe Le Van
Hi, JSR-168 is very complex and very "java minded". I believe a portlet framework in PHP should not be a copy of JSR-168. But JSR-168 includes a standard called WSRP for remote portlets calls. I believe a portlet framework in PHP should be much simpler than JSR-168 but should be compatible

RE: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
k General > Subject: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet? > > I'm currently developing an application which has some CMS- > or portal- like features. While doing some research for the > API design, I discovered a Java standard called "JSR-168 > Portlet

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-22 Thread Stefan Koopmanschap
Hi,On 9/22/06, Gregory Szorc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Portlets can be customized in so many different ways and there is so much one can do with a portlet.  I don't see how anybody can abstract portlets to a level desirable for a framework.  Of course, JSR-168 is a standard, so it carries some cre

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-22 Thread Gregory Szorc
I agree it would be beneficial to support a unified portlet API, but I have reservations about putting it in ZF.  There are many portlet API's out there.  We must consider that part of the reason sites like www.google.com/ig, www.netvibes.com, www.pageflakes.com, etc created their own API's is bec

RE: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-22 Thread Georg von der Howen
Georg von der Howen > -Original Message- > From: Willie Alberty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 2:41 AM > To: Zend Framework General > Subject: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet? > > I'm currently developing an applicat

Re: [fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-21 Thread Arnaud Limbourg
Could you explain a bit more what it is, I didn't read the spec and I found the site vague. Arnaud. Willie Alberty wrote: I'm currently developing an application which has some CMS- or portal-like features. While doing some research for the API design, I discovered a Java standard called "JSR

[fw-general] Any interest in a Zend_Portlet?

2006-09-21 Thread Willie Alberty
I'm currently developing an application which has some CMS- or portal- like features. While doing some research for the API design, I discovered a Java standard called "JSR-168 Portlet API 1.0" jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=168> which defines a standard extensible API for portlets. I think I'm go