CSS images loading at the moment.
- Robert
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Fogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 April 2008 09:54
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: RE: [fw-general] ZF performance advice
Ralf Kramer wrote:
>
> On my development box I have average excecution time
Ralf Kramer wrote:
>
> On my development box I have average excecution times between 0.2 and
> 0.4. This is an ubuntu linux, but it runs on a vmware workstation.
> Though, Zend Platform is installed...
>
> I have moved the application to a very common production server. It is a
> Dual-Core AMD
Hi Dennis,
unless you plan to serve this website from your laptop, do NOT profile
it on your laptop!! And unless you plan to serve empty pages, why are
you profiling empty pages?
You are making a big mistake. Early optimization is the root of all
evil, and this is *real* early optimization (even b
Am Mittwoch, den 17.10.2007, 23:26 -0700 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
> There's no chance you'll even be close to the ridiculously slow
> performance you are getting now and you may even find that your
> optimizations (with the right config) will give you much less bang for
> the buck.
On my development
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 6:03 PM
> To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> Subject: Re: [fw-general] ZF performance advice
>
>
> I did some more investigation:
>
> I'm not getting much of a performance boost from either eAccelerator
or
> Zend
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:43 PM
> To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> Subject: Re: [fw-general] ZF performance advice
>
>
>
> Dennis Fogg wrote:
> >
> > I completed the basic structure of my ZF infrastructure
> > and no
Dennis Fogg wrote:
>
> I completed the basic structure of my ZF infrastructure
> and noticed that it seemed quite slow.
>
Summary:
My Zend framework page generation time went from 1.2 sec to 0.4 sec using a
number of techniques. I compare my performance with Rob Allen's tutorial
code (which h
Dennis Fogg wrote:
>
> I used MySQL this time and the db connection times are quick! About 0.02
> - 0.03 sec on my computer compared to 0.57 sec with Postgres.
>
Found the performance bug in my ZF infrastructure and wanted to report the
real results here
(I don't want to incorrectly character
-- Lepidosteus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 12 October 2007, 07:14 PM +0200):
> On 10/12/07, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First off, I've heard that eaccelerator and xcache's approaches to
> > opcode caching may not be terribly performant; switching to APC or Zend
-- Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 12 October 2007, 06:03 PM -0700):
> I did some more investigation:
>
> I'm not getting much of a performance boost from either eAccelerator or Zend
> Optimizer
> over no op code cache for my ZF infrastructure, which is a bit of a
> surprise.
>
We tested now a couple of months and eAccelerator was working with 5.0.x
but just partially with 5.1.x and 5.2.x. Later some people i know tried
same thing and eAccelerator wasn't working as expected on 5.2.x.
No idea now, but due to slow development i won't recommend eAccelerator
for develope
Dennis Fogg wrote:
>
>
> tfk wrote:
>>
>> Just curious - but do they really work? I know that supposedly a
>> persistant connection is re-used and you save the overhead of
>> establishing the connection etc. - but have you check if it actually
>> works?
>>
>
> I have not done any sql with my
Does your app rely on autoload or even do you use
Zend_Loader::loadClass() a lot?
Just a bit curious
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Dennis Fogg wrote:
I did some more investigation:
I'm not getting much of a performance boost from either
eAccelerator or Zend
Optimizer
over no op code cac
I did some more investigation:
I'm not getting much of a performance boost from either eAccelerator or Zend
Optimizer
over no op code cache for my ZF infrastructure, which is a bit of a
surprise.
I decided to try optimization on code that everyone can try.
I loaded Rob Allen's current ZF tuto
tfk wrote:
>
> Just curious - but do they really work? I know that supposedly a
> persistant connection is re-used and you save the overhead of
> establishing the connection etc. - but have you check if it actually
> works?
>
I have not done any sql with my db connection yet so I don't have ex
On 10/12/07, Cristian Bichis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will repeat what i said now couple of months.
>
> eAccelerator is kinda obsolete due to fact he doesn't support PHP 5.2.x
> properly (can't remember now if for 5.1.x is same thing). Even if PHP
> 5.2 is released by some time eAccelerator w
I will repeat what i said now couple of months.
eAccelerator is kinda obsolete due to fact he doesn't support PHP 5.2.x
properly (can't remember now if for 5.1.x is same thing). Even if PHP
5.2 is released by some time eAccelerator wasn't updated to properly
support newer PHP versions.
Crist
On 10/12/07, Lepidosteus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First off, I've heard that eaccelerator and xcache's approaches to
> > opcode caching may not be terribly performant; switching to APC or Zend
> > Platform would likely help ach
On 10/12/07, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, I've heard that eaccelerator and xcache's approaches to
> opcode caching may not be terribly performant; switching to APC or Zend
> Platform would likely help achieve better results.
Don't know who said you that one, but
ything more that could be interesting to cache, apart from
> resultsets from database queries?
>
> thanks
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: till [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: viernes, 12 de octubre de 2007 10:41
> Para: Dennis Fogg
> CC: fw-general@lis
from
resultsets from database queries?
thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: till [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de octubre de 2007 10:41
Para: Dennis Fogg
CC: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Asunto: Re: [fw-general] ZF performance advice
Hi
On 10/12/07, Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL P
Hi
On 10/12/07, Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (...)
> -use eAccelerator as opcode cache
I am sure you probably had no issues yet, but I ran into plenty of
weirdness with eAccelerator and Zend Framework, but I had no issues
with APC.
> My ZF infrastructure currently does the following:
On 10/12/07, Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Apache 2.2.4 and I just tried out
> your MS Windows conjecture by trying:
>
> echo "Windows or Zend Framework?";
> echo "time=" . xdebug_time_index();
> ?>
>
> which generally returns the page in .004 sec (4 ms) with a few spikes that
-- Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 11 October 2007, 06:36 PM -0700):
>
> I completed the basic structure of my ZF infrastructure
> and noticed that it seemed quite slow.
> So, I did some performance profiling and used some
> performance tools only to find that ZF is pretty slo
Hi Parnell,
Thanks for the performance tips and references!
Yes, I am loading a number of my own files in unoptimized ways.
But my profiling tells me that it does not matter (at this point anyway)
since the times are dominated by ZF code.
Yeah, I did notice a blip in Zend_log also. I noticed
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your quick reply. I'm using Apache 2.2.4 and I just tried out
your MS Windows conjecture by trying:
which generally returns the page in .004 sec (4 ms) with a few spikes that
take longer.
So it seems that my PHP stack on Windows is plenty fast and is not the
problem.
ZF o
It depends alot on how you are loading those modules too. I try to use a
load on request for the less used classes (using autoload) and load the
heavily used classes in the bootstrap so they are available to the
entire app.
Major speed improvements when I use static methods in my own classes
inste
On 10/11/07, Dennis Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I completed the basic structure of my ZF infrastructure
> and noticed that it seemed quite slow.
> Over 20+ runs, I got the following data:
>
> .57 sec (44%) for db connection even though it's persistent connection
> .26 sec (20%) for Zend_Co
I completed the basic structure of my ZF infrastructure
and noticed that it seemed quite slow.
So, I did some performance profiling and used some
performance tools only to find that ZF is pretty slow for me:
a blank page takes 1.3 sec to load.
I'm pretty new to performance tuning so I'm seeking a
29 matches
Mail list logo
