PM
To: Maghiel Dijksman
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Validate_NotEmpty and Object
One such "empty" object would be an iterator that has nothing to iterate. There
are other examples, but there's no way to test if an object is empty without a
method to
In that case it is empty but still, it is an object. But I understand
what you mean! "Empty" is just to vague as a word to describe this.
Maybe the english vocabulary needs a new term! :p
On 4-3-2010 19:21, Hector Virgen wrote:
One such "empty" object would be an iterator that has nothing to
i
One such "empty" object would be an iterator that has nothing to iterate.
There are other examples, but there's no way to test if an object is empty
without a method to determine it because various objects would have
different implementations on how to determine if it is empty.
--
Hector
On Thu,
How can an object be empty? It's an instance of a class. So it is something.
On 4-3-2010 17:55, Alayn Gortazar wrote:
El jue, 04-03-2010 a las 08:32 -0800, Hector Virgen escribió:
You could create an "Empty" interface (or rather, Emptiable since I
don't think you can use Empty):
interface
El jue, 04-03-2010 a las 08:32 -0800, Hector Virgen escribió:
> You could create an "Empty" interface (or rather, Emptiable since I
> don't think you can use Empty):
>
>
> interface Emptiable
> {
> public function isEmpty();
> }
>
>
> Then make your validator accept Emptiable objects along
You could create an "Empty" interface (or rather, Emptiable since I don't
think you can use Empty):
interface Emptiable
{
public function isEmpty();
}
Then make your validator accept Emptiable objects along with strings,
arrays, ints, etc.
Maybe you can come up with a better name than Emptia
El jue, 04-03-2010 a las 16:20 +0100, Giorgio Sironi escribió:
>
> I'll take advantage of this thread and ask:
> How do you test if an object is empty or not??
>
> Actually empty object should not exist as testing for one would break
> encapsulation. An "empty" object is
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Alayn Gortazar wrote:
> El jue, 04-03-2010 a las 11:43 +0100, Giorgio Sironi escribió:
> >> I guess it has to do with the way it is used in Zend_Form... usually
> > you pass scalar values in a form.
>
> I'll take advantage of this thread and ask:
> How do you test
Hello,
I don't use the validator to validate a form, I use it to validate my models.
So I wrote my own little "Required" validator to handel this...
Greetings,
Stefan Sturm
ow, I just validate scalars before I change them into objects.
Ludwig
From: Giorgio Sironi
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:43 AM
To: Stefan Sturm
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Validate_NotEmpty and Object
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Stefan Sturm
El jue, 04-03-2010 a las 11:43 +0100, Giorgio Sironi escribió:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Stefan Sturm
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I test a variable containing an Object with
> Zend_Validate_NotEmpty. I get this error:
> Invalid type given, value sho
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Stefan Sturm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I test a variable containing an Object with
> Zend_Validate_NotEmpty. I get this error:
> Invalid type given, value should be float, string, array, boolean or
> integer
>
I guess it has to do with the way it is used in Zend_F
Hello,
when I test a variable containing an Object with
Zend_Validate_NotEmpty. I get this error:
Invalid type given, value should be float, string, array, boolean or integer
But, why an object is invalid for NotEmpty?
Thanks for your help,
Stefan Sturm
13 matches
Mail list logo
