Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-17 Thread Bart McLeod
I addition: The color picker looks the same in IE 7, Chrome, Firefox. I suppose I just don't get that one... Bart Bart McLeod schreef: Hey Ben, Exactly the type of gadgets I use /Intend to use. Is it right that the color picker doesn't work in IE 7? I did not look at your code yet, for lack o

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-17 Thread Bart McLeod
Hey Ben, Exactly the type of gadgets I use /Intend to use. Is it right that the color picker doesn't work in IE 7? I did not look at your code yet, for lack of time. I would like to use the accordeon container around collections of form elements. Is it available as a decorator in your setup? I

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-17 Thread Benjamin Eberlei
Hey Bart, they are up again. my webserver had an unexpected downtime yesterday. :-) On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:27:05 Bart McLeod wrote: > Hello Benjamin, > > Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping > the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-17 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:10 PM > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? > > -- valugi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 02:41 AM -0700): > > Since now I was also using jQuery and d

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-17 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- mothmenace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 12:53 PM -0700): > > Just wanted to add another vote for jQuery, I started JS frameworks with > Prototype, found jQuery a little hard to get my head around at first but now > it's clearly the leading js-f. Not sure exactly how

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread Bart McLeod
Hello Benjamin, Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the development going on :-) . I will take a look at it for sure. However, the links you provide are dead: www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ www.beberle

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread mothmenace
Just wanted to add another vote for jQuery, I started JS frameworks with Prototype, found jQuery a little hard to get my head around at first but now it's clearly the leading js-f. Not sure exactly how jQuery would be integrated with zf, it's more a case of writing some specific jQuery plugins I t

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread Benjamin Eberlei
Hello Bart, i have already put together two proposal concerning jQuery support, one for a generic helper that takes care of loading jQuery from CDN or local path and takes care of a document ready (on load) execution stack. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread Tobias Gies
Hey Alexandre, 2008/9/16 S. Alexandre M. Lemaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [...snip...] > > Does Dojo still behave this way? Does it offer any kind of 'roll your own' > like Ext does with JSBuilder so that you can foresee inclusions and reduce > during-operation IO overhead? There is a tool in doj

RE: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread S. Alexandre M. Lemaire
, 2008 12:10 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? -- valugi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 02:41 AM -0700): > Since now I was also using jQuery and decided to give a try to Dojo since > it's part of the ZF. > Doing sim

Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???

2008-09-16 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- valugi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 02:41 AM -0700): > Since now I was also using jQuery and decided to give a try to Dojo since > it's part of the ZF. > Doing simple things like an ajax request and fill some data into a table are > incredible complex in Dojo. I b