has anyone implemented a 'better version' of the vacation program for
themselves?
I'm particularly interested in 'screening' the bulk-mail type messages
that list me in their "bcc:" header so that my address does not show up
in the "from:" or &quo
At 05:34 PM 11/27/2001 -0500, Scott R. Godin wrote (to a *lot* of lists):
>I'm very anxious to get back at these spamming bastards somehow, as this
>intrusion into my personal e-mail is MOST unwelcome, and I've got a
>growing passion to stamp out this *expletive deleted* practice as often
>as I ca
info.
--Bill.
Scott R. Godin writes:
>has anyone implemented a 'better version' of the vacation program for
>themselves?
>
>I'm particularly interested in 'screening' the bulk-mail type messages
>that list me in their "bcc:" header so that my add
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 22:34, Scott R. Godin wrote:
> I've noticed that near 99% of the spam I receive uses this method to
> mask it from reciept, so typically I filter this with my mailer into a
> dumping ground, but the sheer amount of spam lately (235 items since Nov
> 5th) has caused me to f
Scott R. Godin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm particularly interested in 'screening' the bulk-mail type
> messages that list me in their "bcc:" header so that my address
> does not show up in the "from:" or "cc:" address listings,
You're lucky that so much of your spam would be blocked by such
> "KCI" == Keith C Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KCI> Be very careful with any solution you implement. For the vast
KCI> majority of spam, the From: address has nothing to do with the
KCI> real sender or any open relay used. Complaining to the
KCI> postmaster there just annoys
"Scott R. Godin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> has anyone implemented a 'better version' of the vacation program for
> themselves?
>From your message it is not quite clear whether your goal is to have
an improved vacation program, or do you want an intellige
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Vromans) wrote:
> "Scott R. Godin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > has anyone implemented a 'better version' of the vacation program for
> > themselves?
>
> From your message
"Scott R. Godin" wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Vromans) wrote:
>
> > "Scott R. Godin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > has anyone implemented a 'better version' of the vacat
