Re: M$ Office was, Re: Apple Mail

2004-12-26 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Sunday, December 26, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Lesher wrote: What I don't grasp is Apple's seeming indifference to the clear alterative: Open Office. I use OO on other platforms, and where I must use a Word-ish product; it's the clear choice. [I prefer WordPerfect, and use it more, but > that

Re: M$ Office was, Re: Apple Mail

2004-12-26 Thread Timothy Luoma
On Dec 26, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Andrew F. wrote: Perhaps because OpenOffice is not the "Clear Alternative" as you state it is. and perhaps part of the reason is that it would hurt Office:Mac, which would hurt Mac users if Microsoft decided to drop it. I prefer WordPerfect, and probably always will,

Re: M$ Office was, Re: Apple Mail

2004-12-26 Thread Andrew F.
Perhaps because OpenOffice is not the "Clear Alternative" as you state it is. I tried it, and like any other "Word Alternative" it requires converstion to and from the .doc format, which introduces all sorts of formatting problems in both directions. Even if it was slick, polished and OS X native

M$ Office was, Re: Apple Mail

2004-12-26 Thread David Lesher
What I don't grasp is Apple's seeming indifference to the clear alterative: Open Office. I use OO on other platforms, and where I must use a Word-ish product; it's the clear choice. [I prefer WordPerfect, and use it more, but that is a side issue..] The major trouble with OO on OSX is it does n