Dan Knight wrote:
>
> I haven't migrated to Jaguar yet -- Apple wants too much money for a
> single copy, and the five-user license is currently out of the budget.
> I'm running OS X 10.1.5 on a 400 MHz TiBook with a 5400 rpm 20 GB IBM
> TravelStar drive and 512 MB of RAM, but more often than
Nick wrote:
> on 12/18/02 11:15 AM, Dan Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>>Finally, although OS X is as stable as you can imagine, OS X applications
>>aren't. Believe it or not -- and it surprised me -- Internet Exploder
>>5.1.x is more stable under OS 9.x than IE 5.2.x is under OS X. Di
Try "Chimera", works great for me. Much better than Netscape 7 and IE.
Jim
>On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 01:07 PM, Nick wrote:
>
>> on 12/18/02 11:15 AM, Dan Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Finally, although OS X is as stable as you can imagine, OS X
>>> applications
>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 01:07 PM, Nick wrote:
> on 12/18/02 11:15 AM, Dan Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> Finally, although OS X is as stable as you can imagine, OS X
>> applications
>> aren't. Believe it or not -- and it surprised me -- Internet Exploder
>> 5.1.x is more
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 12:32 PM, Amber Rhea wrote:
> One last comment: I wouldn't be using OS X at *all* if it weren't for
> WindowShadeX! I *hate* the default behavior of OS X's "minimzing"
> windows - looks wy too much like Windows to me, and for me it is
> more difficult to k
I run Jag on a 400 G3 Pismo with 768MB and a 4200rpm drive ... its
great ... I will say everyone should take the plunge ...
David
> Not saying you should or should not take the plunge for Jaguar - just
> sharing my experience. Heck, I wouldn't be using it if I hadn't
> received a free (LEGAL! be
On 18/12/02 13:07, "Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 12/18/02 11:15 AM, Dan Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> Finally, although OS X is as stable as you can imagine, OS X applications
>> aren't. Believe it or not -- and it surprised me -- Internet Exploder
>> 5.1.x is more stable un
On 18/12/02 12:32, "Amber Rhea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One last comment: I wouldn't be using OS X at *all* if it weren't for
> WindowShadeX! I *hate* the default behavior of OS X's "minimzing"
> windows - looks wy too much like Windows to me, and for me it is
> more difficult to keep tra
on 12/18/02 11:15 AM, Dan Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Finally, although OS X is as stable as you can imagine, OS X applications
> aren't. Believe it or not -- and it surprised me -- Internet Exploder
> 5.1.x is more stable under OS 9.x than IE 5.2.x is under OS X. Ditto for
> iCab. These
Amber Rhea on 12/18/02 12:32 PM wrote:
> One last comment: I wouldn't be using OS X at *all* if it weren't for
> WindowShadeX! I *hate* the default behavior of OS X's "minimzing"
While I wouldn't quite using OSX without WindowShade X, I have to say it's
well worth the $7 shareware fee. I love tha
One last comment: I wouldn't be using OS X at *all* if it weren't for
WindowShadeX! I *hate* the default behavior of OS X's "minimzing"
windows - looks wy too much like Windows to me, and for me it is
more difficult to keep track of everything I have open, than if I have
their menubars floa
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 11:18 AM, (G-Books) wrote:
> My computer handles OS 9 beautifully. 400 MHz is plenty of speed. The
> new
> drive and half gig of memory helps with OS X, but it's still sluggish.
> I
> hate to imagine using it on a stock WallStreet, Lombard, Pismo, or
> sub-600
On 18/12/02 11:15, "Dan Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> I use CopyAgent to intelligently copy files between my working partition
> and a backup folder on another partition. It's smart enough to only copy
> files that are different. And if I really make a mess of things, I can
> recover
David M. Ensteness writes:
>Is this an honest question or a troll?
Mac OS Anything vs. any version of Windows (or *nix for that matter) is a
troll and specifically declared off topic on this list. This list is for
supporting Mac users on the Mac OS, either classic or X.
>I say that because Mac
14 matches
Mail list logo
