Re: http://lowendmac.com/musings/06/0109.html

2006-01-19 Thread Peter Saint James
with desiring something better than 1152x768 resolution, I wonder how many of us could cope with high resolution on small screens as we advance in age? I keep looking at a new 12 powerbook, but keep fretting about whether my eyesight would cope with font sizes beyond comfortable

Re: http://lowendmac.com/musings/06/0109.html

2006-01-12 Thread darm0k
At 9:02 PM -0700 01/11/2006, P. Turtle-Bear Guillermo wrote: Are literally using a magnifying glass? hehehehehe. Yea. How about using the built in zoom function of OS X? Doesn't work during the installs, after the monitor was forced to the higher res. - Dan. -- G-Books is sponsored

Re: http://lowendmac.com/musings/06/0109.html

2006-01-11 Thread darm0k
At 9:45 PM +1300 01/10/2006, Bryan Taylor wrote: with desiring something better than 1152x768 resolution, I wonder how many of us could cope with high resolution on small screens as we advance in age? I keep looking at a new 12 powerbook, but keep fretting about whether my eyesight would

Re: http://lowendmac.com/musings/06/0109.html

2006-01-11 Thread P . Turtle-Bear Guillermo
Are literally using a magnifying glass? How about using the built in zoom function of OS X? It may take some getting used to it, but I have found it valuable. I'm using Panther, so here are my instructions: Go to System Preferences-Universal Access-Seeing-Turn On Zoom In this window you will

http://lowendmac.com/musings/06/0109.html

2006-01-10 Thread Bryan Taylor
Hi, Dan's article about his 400MHz tibook is a parallel to my 667MHz VGA model. Including worn paint, marked screen from the keyboard and although I agree with desiring something better than 1152x768 resolution, I wonder how many of us could cope with high resolution on small screens as