System Configuration
Model: PowerMac7,3, BootROM 5.2.4f1, 2 processors, PowerPC G5 (3.1),
2.3 GHz, 5 GB
Graphics: kHW_ATIrv351leItem, ATY,RV351, spdisplays_agp_device, 128 MB
Memory Module: DIMM0/J11, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30440
Memory Module: DIMM1/J12, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30440
Me
until all your Ram passes.
Slowly introduce your PCI cards and peripherals back into the computer and use
it for a while to see if the problem persists.
Sometimes it is just a long process of elimination.
Stewie
From: macgu...@gmail.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Kernel panic? why?
Dat
On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
>
> here's the report... anybody got a clue?
>
> Interval Since Last Panic Report: 580133 sec
> Panics Since Last Report: 1
> Anonymous UUID:10C6C46F-CE7C-477C-92F8-
> FC97D168236F
>
> Tue Oct 20 11:26:14 2009
>
>
On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
>
>>
>> here's the report... anybody got a clue?
>>
>> Interval Since Last Panic Report: 580133 sec
>> Panics Since Last Report: 1
>> Anonymous UUID:10C6C46F-C
At 8:57 AM -0700 10/21/2009, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
> > Tue Oct 20 11:26:14 2009
> > BSD process name corresponding to current thread: rsync
>
>One-off KP's do happen, but looking at the time since the last panic
>(6 days) and the thread running
On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> One-off KP's do happen, but looking at the time since the last panic
> (6 days) and the thread running (rsync) Was your mac doing a backup
> with CCC, SuperDuper or Rsync?
>
> Can you reproduce the error by running the software you were running
On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
> After unplugging
> everything, yup, started right up fine and fast. after about two hours
> of testing, I found that the timeouts believe it or not, were coming
> from a "Speedzter 5" enclosure that I have a superdrive in. It seems
> that the
On Oct 21, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>
> I've had a rash of "weird errors with ^...@#%@$ Firewire Boxes" lately.
>
> A professor just had his Iomega external drive cause OS X to be unable
> to launch anything after it's plugged in. Weird. All the programs
> running *before* you plu
On Oct 20, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Stewie de Young wrote:
> The best way is to eliminate all unknowns by removing all your
> plugged in gear - PCI cards , peripherals etc and start from a very
> basic machine.
> Then I would download and run "Memtest ".
> Problems if any with Ram modules will appea
On Oct 22, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
>
> Now.. after I thought I'd fixed the problem last night by
> disconnecting my firewire device, this morning... the same blue
> screen... now sometimes stupid I am, realized and thought of this
> question.. if the computer boots fine from the
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Uhh "C" drive?
I mean, starting it up via the super-drive and Tiger/Leopard install
disk. (holding down the C key) sorry. J
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> If it *STILL* KP's after that, you have a hardware fault.
I wonder when Apple will make a computer that "just tells me" what's
the matter with it? Or just hollers at me, "Hey, buddy! that firewire
device you just plugged in ain't gonna wo
- Original Message
> From: Jeffrey Engle
> > If it *STILL* KP's after that, you have a hardware fault.
>
> I wonder when Apple will make a computer that "just tells me" what's
> the matter with it? Or just hollers at me, "Hey, buddy! that firewire
> device you just plugged in a
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> If it *STILL* KP's after that, you have a hardware fault.
>
> I wonder when Apple will make a computer that "just tells me" what's
> the matter with it?
Seriously, it's because of the nat
> Date: Thurs, Oct 22 2009 5:15 pm
> From: Bruce Johnson
>
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
>
>> On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> If it *STILL* KP's after that, you have a hardware fault.
>>
>> I wonder when Apple will make a computer that "just tells me
On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:28 PM, dorayme wrote:
> But surely *just* before it does this, it knows it is going to do
> this
That would be where the thiotimoline bit comes in...google it.
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group
Institutions do not ha
> TOPIC: Kernel panic? why?
> http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list/t/3f6b58de1e6e93ee?hl=en
> ==
>
>
> == 1 of 1 ==
> Date: Sat, Oct 24 2009 12:02 pm
> From: Bruce Johnson
>
> On Oct
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:28 PM, dorayme wrote:
>>
>
> The thiotimoline bit I understand. Translated, you are possibly
> saying, it is logically impossible to do X. Not sure how to google
> for why an instruction that cannot be executed makes it impossible to
> design the OS to say as much. Lacking
On Oct 24, 2009, at 4:28 PM, dorayme wrote:
> . Lacking a good model, I guess. Is it
> like someone falls into a sound proof black hole suddenly and cannot
> message anything?
Pretty much. The Google article about 'kernel panic' does explain
things; the idea is to stop the computer from doing
> Date: Sat, Oct 24 2009 7:11 pm
> From: Len Gerstel
>
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:28 PM, dorayme wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> The thiotimoline bit I understand. Translated, you are possibly
>> saying, it is logically impossible to do X. Not sure how to google
>> for why an instruction that cannot be execut
20 matches
Mail list logo
