Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-27 Thread Paul
I've had pretty good luck with Adobe Reader 7, which runs on OS X. (I think you need version 5 for OS 9.) Versions 6, 8, and 9 all seem bloated. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those us

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-27 Thread Dan
At 12:12 PM -0800 11/27/2008, dorayme wrote: >On Nov 27, 1:36 am, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Safari 3.2.1 *IS* the clean update. >> >> The big problem now is that so many add-ons for Safari need updating. > >There should be a facility in Software Update (for Safari) that allows >you to

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-27 Thread dorayme
On Nov 27, 1:36 am, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Safari 3.2.1 *IS* the clean update. > > The big problem now is that so many add-ons for Safari need updating. There should be a facility in Software Update (for Safari) that allows you to tick boxes for all the popular plugin updates that Appl

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-26 Thread Michael B. in Cincinnati
I moved to Opera; it's noticeably faster than Safari. - Michael B. in Cincinnati On Nov 26, 10:49 am, Richard Ramsowr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a follow up to my question... > > I Pulled out my "IceClean" program and put it to good use and now   > everything is working correctly... > >

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-26 Thread Richard Ramsowr
Here's a follow up to my question... I Pulled out my "IceClean" program and put it to good use and now everything is working correctly... But thanks for the input, I'll check out the few plug-in that I have. Thanks and have a safe and fun filled holiday! Yours Rick Rick Houston --~--~-

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-26 Thread Dan
At 10:34 PM -0600 11/25/2008, Richard Ramsowr wrote: >I just upgraded to Safari 3.2.1 and my OS X is 10.5.5 and I'm see a >couple of issues, so I'm wondering if others are have the same >problems? Do you have any plug-ins or inputmanagers installed, beyond the normal Flash, Flip4Mac, and Quick

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-26 Thread Dan
At 10:53 PM -0800 11/25/2008, Paul wrote: >I guess I'll stick with Safari 3.1 or Firefox until a cleaner update >comes out. Safari 3.2.1 *IS* the clean update. The big problem now is that so many add-ons for Safari need updating. Like *all* browsers -- You need to make sure any plug-ins / inpu

Re: Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-26 Thread Dan
At 11:13 PM -0500 11/25/2008, Peter wrote: > >Apple released an update already? yea, pretty shocking 'eh? - Dan. -- - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 L

Re: New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-25 Thread Paul
I guess I'll stick with Safari 3.1 or Firefox until a cleaner update comes out. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Pow

New Question... Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-25 Thread Richard Ramsowr
I just upgraded to Safari 3.2.1 and my OS X is 10.5.5 and I'm see a couple of issues, so I'm wondering if others are have the same problems? I. I'm unable to see ink supply levels on my Cannon i560 2. I can not save PDF directly... I get a OS 61 error... what ever that is? 3. I can not tak

Re: Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-25 Thread Peter
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OMG! Apple did something ... better. > > At 9:52 AM -0500 11/14/2008, Dan wrote: > > > >Apple hit us with Safari 3.2 yesterday. > > > >So far, I'm not excited. It gets only 75/100 on Acid3 - with a few > >long pauses. And on ot

Safari 3.2.1 is fast! (was Re: Safari 3.2 is slooow).

2008-11-25 Thread Dan
OMG! Apple did something ... better. At 9:52 AM -0500 11/14/2008, Dan wrote: > >Apple hit us with Safari 3.2 yesterday. > >So far, I'm not excited. It gets only 75/100 on Acid3 - with a few >long pauses. And on other sites, I've found it to be slower than >Safari 3.1. The speed difference i