Hi, Paul
I would like to know if mod_wsgi has been considered for the deployment of
Galaxy at all, and whether anyone has any positive or negative experiences
with it.
I can only speak for the second part of your question: I've had some
experience with Apache 2 + mod_wsgi, but within a Django
On 24/10/12 18:09, Carl Eberhard wrote:
I would like to know if mod_wsgi has been considered for the deployment of
Galaxy at all, and whether anyone has any positive or negative experiences with
it.
I can only speak for the second part of your question: I've had some
experience with Apache 2
The Galaxy application does store quite a bit in memory (not as
globals though). This doesn't preclude running under mod_wsgi, but it
will work best in a configuration that uses a small number of long
running processes with multiple threads.
Basically, we run nginx proxying paste on the main
Hello,
I have recently had the opportunity to look at the deployment of Galaxy
together with Apache, and I saw that the recommendation is to run the
Galaxy Web server behind Apache with the latter acting as a proxy:
http://wiki.g2.bx.psu.edu/Admin/Config/Apache%20Proxy
Other than
