Yes, me as well. It looks more like using a pantechnicon to go to the corner
shop for a loaf of bread and a bottle of milk. :-)
regards
Bruce
--
B Bruen
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java a
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:48:47 +0200
Tobias Boege wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, B Bruen wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:23:41 +0200
> > Tobias Boege wrote:
> >
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > I'm currently (well, I'll try to continue with it tomorrow) implementing
> > > an
> > > abstract Graph class
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Rob Kudla wrote:
> On 07/06/2014 02:21 PM, J?rn Erik M?rne wrote:
> > bit too ... what word to put? It just feels a bit like using your fist to
> > get
> > the nail in, when there's a hammer... I came across an open source rails
> > mailinglist/board type of solution that lo
As Rob says, I get my email using Thunderbird (either on my Ubuntu machine
or my Win7 machine) I haven't used a mailing list in a very long time.
I like the interface I have now.
Bill
Rob Kudla wrote, On 07/06/2014 16:59:
On 07/06/2014 02:21 PM, Jørn Erik Mørne wrote:
bit too
On 07/06/2014 02:21 PM, Jørn Erik Mørne wrote:
> bit too ... what word to put? It just feels a bit like using your fist to get
> the nail in, when there's a hammer... I came across an open source rails
> mailinglist/board type of solution that looks really nice, and it could work
> really well f
Le 06/07/2014 22:12, Charlie Reinl a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, den 06.07.2014, 21:56 +0200 schrieb Tobias Boege:
>> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Wolfgang, dl7nb wrote:
>>> Thank you Beno?t!
>>>
>>> At the moment I can not see the 3.5.4. Still get the 3.5.3 no matter if
>>> I reload my packet definitions.
>>> I
Now, I see. Benoit always does such a excellent job, that I assumed that the
repos were already there.
I think I can wait a few days! ;-)
Sorry for wasting your time!
Wolfgang
Tobias Boege schrieb:
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Wolfgang, dl7nb wrote:
>> Thank you Beno?t!
>>
>> At the moment I can
Am Sonntag, den 06.07.2014, 21:56 +0200 schrieb Tobias Boege:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Wolfgang, dl7nb wrote:
> > Thank you Beno?t!
> >
> > At the moment I can not see the 3.5.4. Still get the 3.5.3 no matter if
> > I reload my packet definitions.
> > I use Ubuntu 12.4 LTS. Think I give it a new tr
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Wolfgang, dl7nb wrote:
> Thank you Beno?t!
>
> At the moment I can not see the 3.5.4. Still get the 3.5.3 no matter if
> I reload my packet definitions.
> I use Ubuntu 12.4 LTS. Think I give it a new try tomorrow...
>
To clarify the situation: a new version just released by
Thank you Benoît!
At the moment I can not see the 3.5.4. Still get the 3.5.3 no matter if
I reload my packet definitions.
I use Ubuntu 12.4 LTS. Think I give it a new try tomorrow...
Wolfgang
Am 06.07.2014 20:21, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> Hi,
>
> Gambas 3.5.4 has been officially released!
>
>
Hello guys!
I'm not writing too often here, but I read most of what's going on through
Nabble, and enjoy learning from the questions asked and the answers
given. I am not sure about you, but to me the mailing list system seems a
bit too ... what word to put? It just feels a bit like using your
Hi,
Gambas 3.5.4 has been officially released!
You can download it and get all the information from the website as usual.
Please report any problem, and enjoy it!
--
Benoît Minisini
--
Open source business process man
Found this: http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/vertices-faces-edges.html
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Randall Morgan wrote:
> If I recall correctly:
>
> A vertex can be thought of as a corner while an edge is a line segment
> connecting to a vertex at both ends. Basically, a vertex is the p
If I recall correctly:
A vertex can be thought of as a corner while an edge is a line segment
connecting to a vertex at both ends. Basically, a vertex is the point at
either end of an edge. Every edge should have two vertex and a vertex may
be shared by one or more edges.
Anyone know differently?
Thanks a lot
I solve the problemthere are two empty ("") value in the string[] that
produce the problem.
Sorry!
--
View this message in context:
http://gambas.8142.n7.nabble.com/String-array-problem-with-val-tp47278p47298.html
Sent from the gambas-user mailing list archive at Nabble.c
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, B Bruen wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:23:41 +0200
> Tobias Boege wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm currently (well, I'll try to continue with it tomorrow) implementing an
> > abstract Graph class in gb.data. And by "abstract", I mean that I will just
> > specify the interfa
> Just do :
>
> Version = LIBVersion()
Hmm, that crashes the Gambas interpreter with a Segmentation fault (11)
message.
/CJ
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes int
Thanks for the input Jussi!
> I don't know the language, but shouldn't "Tripple := numberin * 3" be
> "Tripple := numberin * 3;"? That would seem consistent.
Good catch! In this particular Pascal code it doesn't really matter since
it's the one
and only line of code in that function but it's now
> Just do :
>
> Version = LIBVersion()
Hmm, that crashes the Gambas interpreter with a Segmentation fault (11) message.
/CJ
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes in
> Just do :
>
> Version = LIBVersion()
Hmm, that crashes the Gambas interpreter with a Segmentation fault (11) message.
/CJ
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes in
> > I'm trying to receive a simple structure from a shared library but
> > get an Type Mismatch error saying...
> >
> >"wanted StructVersion, got Function instead in FMain:87"
> >
>
> You must put "()" after the identifier to call it as a function.
Fabian and Benoît,
Unfortunately that crash
Sorry if this message appears twice on the list, had issues posting again...
> Just do :
>
> Version = LIBVersion()
Hmm, that crashes the Gambas interpreter with a Segmentation fault (11)
message.
/CJ
--
Open source
Thanks for the input Jussi!
> I don't know the language, but shouldn't "Tripple := numberin * 3" be
> "Tripple := numberin * 3;"? That would seem consistent.
Good catch! In this particular Pascal code it doesn't really matter since
it's the one
and only line of code in that function but it's now
Thanks for the input Jussi!
> I don't know the language, but shouldn't "Tripple := numberin * 3" be
> "Tripple := numberin * 3;"? That would seem consistent.
Good catch! In this particular Pascal code it doesn't really matter since
it's the one
and only line of code in that function but it's now
If you are sure to use point each time you convert with CFloat
Le 5 juil. 2014 21:33, "Tobias Boege" a écrit :
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2014, kungfupanda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've a problem with conversion of a string array in integer.
> > I'm using gb.chart to create a line graph with a lot of element
25 matches
Mail list logo
