So I imagine this has been forgotten and dropped by the wayside, but I have
found cde to be very useful in making my app work in opensolaris,
OpenIndiana, PC-BSD and some linux builds, mainly suse and ubuntu.
@Benoît
I think cde may be the best viable solution at packaging libraries for
This subject was mentioned some time ago.
Myself was very font of the idea to be a way to package the system libs
for gambas projects together with executables.
Some users said although a different opinion.
This was that, it is good not to break the linux way of system libs
existence.
At
IS there any movement on the Gambas3 packaging suite to compile and/or
include the runtime and libs for the various distributions? I also looked
at the CDE route and exceptions can be made to keep files to a minimum and
just run your app with cde gbr3 project.gambas
I got minimal results
IS there any movement on the Gambas3 packaging suite to compile and/or
include the runtime and libs for the various distributions? I also looked
at the CDE route and exceptions can be made to keep files to a minimum and
just run your app with cde gbr3 project.gambas
I got minimal results though
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer
to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting
with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin
installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe Benoit would
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would
prefer to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of
fighting with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a
myprogram.bin installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe
Benoit
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would
prefer to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of
fighting with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a
myprogram.bin installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe
Benoit
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer
to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting
with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin
installer, than myprogram.rpm,
yes this is better.
i tried cde with gambas project and it copied all the files in
cde-package included passwd /home directory and other files that
application used.
This feature should work only for libs and as an option for packagers
not an only way method.
This is my opinion.
On Sun,
Hi Gambas List,
It's been a while since I last posted here.
I came across this nice project: CDE
(http://stanford.edu/~pgbovine/cde.html) and I thought of Gambas. It is a
really interesting automatic packaging tool to share applications among
different Linux distributions... It does so by
Very very nice program indeed!
I was looking something like that to make installation packages for my
Gambas projects that include libs of Gambas and able to run without the
whole IDE or the whole language.
Another thing is that every package is self independent from system libs
or other
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer
to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting
with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin
installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe Benoit would argue
12 matches
Mail list logo
